Cargando…

Critical assessment of human metabolic pathway databases: a stepping stone for future integration

BACKGROUND: Multiple pathway databases are available that describe the human metabolic network and have proven their usefulness in many applications, ranging from the analysis and interpretation of high-throughput data to their use as a reference repository. However, so far the various human metabol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stobbe, Miranda D, Houten, Sander M, Jansen, Gerbert A, van Kampen, Antoine HC, Moerland, Perry D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3271347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21999653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-5-165
_version_ 1782222690360229888
author Stobbe, Miranda D
Houten, Sander M
Jansen, Gerbert A
van Kampen, Antoine HC
Moerland, Perry D
author_facet Stobbe, Miranda D
Houten, Sander M
Jansen, Gerbert A
van Kampen, Antoine HC
Moerland, Perry D
author_sort Stobbe, Miranda D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Multiple pathway databases are available that describe the human metabolic network and have proven their usefulness in many applications, ranging from the analysis and interpretation of high-throughput data to their use as a reference repository. However, so far the various human metabolic networks described by these databases have not been systematically compared and contrasted, nor has the extent to which they differ been quantified. For a researcher using these databases for particular analyses of human metabolism, it is crucial to know the extent of the differences in content and their underlying causes. Moreover, the outcomes of such a comparison are important for ongoing integration efforts. RESULTS: We compared the genes, EC numbers and reactions of five frequently used human metabolic pathway databases. The overlap is surprisingly low, especially on reaction level, where the databases agree on 3% of the 6968 reactions they have combined. Even for the well-established tricarboxylic acid cycle the databases agree on only 5 out of the 30 reactions in total. We identified the main causes for the lack of overlap. Importantly, the databases are partly complementary. Other explanations include the number of steps a conversion is described in and the number of possible alternative substrates listed. Missing metabolite identifiers and ambiguous names for metabolites also affect the comparison. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that each of the five networks compared provides us with a valuable piece of the puzzle of the complete reconstruction of the human metabolic network. To enable integration of the networks, next to a need for standardizing the metabolite names and identifiers, the conceptual differences between the databases should be resolved. Considerable manual intervention is required to reach the ultimate goal of a unified and biologically accurate model for studying the systems biology of human metabolism. Our comparison provides a stepping stone for such an endeavor.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3271347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32713472012-02-06 Critical assessment of human metabolic pathway databases: a stepping stone for future integration Stobbe, Miranda D Houten, Sander M Jansen, Gerbert A van Kampen, Antoine HC Moerland, Perry D BMC Syst Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Multiple pathway databases are available that describe the human metabolic network and have proven their usefulness in many applications, ranging from the analysis and interpretation of high-throughput data to their use as a reference repository. However, so far the various human metabolic networks described by these databases have not been systematically compared and contrasted, nor has the extent to which they differ been quantified. For a researcher using these databases for particular analyses of human metabolism, it is crucial to know the extent of the differences in content and their underlying causes. Moreover, the outcomes of such a comparison are important for ongoing integration efforts. RESULTS: We compared the genes, EC numbers and reactions of five frequently used human metabolic pathway databases. The overlap is surprisingly low, especially on reaction level, where the databases agree on 3% of the 6968 reactions they have combined. Even for the well-established tricarboxylic acid cycle the databases agree on only 5 out of the 30 reactions in total. We identified the main causes for the lack of overlap. Importantly, the databases are partly complementary. Other explanations include the number of steps a conversion is described in and the number of possible alternative substrates listed. Missing metabolite identifiers and ambiguous names for metabolites also affect the comparison. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that each of the five networks compared provides us with a valuable piece of the puzzle of the complete reconstruction of the human metabolic network. To enable integration of the networks, next to a need for standardizing the metabolite names and identifiers, the conceptual differences between the databases should be resolved. Considerable manual intervention is required to reach the ultimate goal of a unified and biologically accurate model for studying the systems biology of human metabolism. Our comparison provides a stepping stone for such an endeavor. BioMed Central 2011-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3271347/ /pubmed/21999653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-5-165 Text en Copyright ©2011 Stobbe et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Stobbe, Miranda D
Houten, Sander M
Jansen, Gerbert A
van Kampen, Antoine HC
Moerland, Perry D
Critical assessment of human metabolic pathway databases: a stepping stone for future integration
title Critical assessment of human metabolic pathway databases: a stepping stone for future integration
title_full Critical assessment of human metabolic pathway databases: a stepping stone for future integration
title_fullStr Critical assessment of human metabolic pathway databases: a stepping stone for future integration
title_full_unstemmed Critical assessment of human metabolic pathway databases: a stepping stone for future integration
title_short Critical assessment of human metabolic pathway databases: a stepping stone for future integration
title_sort critical assessment of human metabolic pathway databases: a stepping stone for future integration
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3271347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21999653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-5-165
work_keys_str_mv AT stobbemirandad criticalassessmentofhumanmetabolicpathwaydatabasesasteppingstoneforfutureintegration
AT houtensanderm criticalassessmentofhumanmetabolicpathwaydatabasesasteppingstoneforfutureintegration
AT jansengerberta criticalassessmentofhumanmetabolicpathwaydatabasesasteppingstoneforfutureintegration
AT vankampenantoinehc criticalassessmentofhumanmetabolicpathwaydatabasesasteppingstoneforfutureintegration
AT moerlandperryd criticalassessmentofhumanmetabolicpathwaydatabasesasteppingstoneforfutureintegration