Cargando…
SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 12: Finding and using research evidence about resource use and costs
This article is part of a series written for people responsible for making decisions about health policies and programmes and for those who support these decision makers. In this article, we address considerations about resource use and costs. The consequences of a policy or programme option for res...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3271823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20018102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S12 |
_version_ | 1782222755885744128 |
---|---|
author | Oxman, Andrew D Fretheim, Atle Lavis, John N Lewin, Simon |
author_facet | Oxman, Andrew D Fretheim, Atle Lavis, John N Lewin, Simon |
author_sort | Oxman, Andrew D |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article is part of a series written for people responsible for making decisions about health policies and programmes and for those who support these decision makers. In this article, we address considerations about resource use and costs. The consequences of a policy or programme option for resource use differ from other impacts (both in terms of benefits and harms) in several ways. However, considerations of the consequences of options for resource use are similar to considerations related to other impacts in that policymakers and their staff need to identify important impacts on resource use, acquire and appraise the best available evidence regarding those impacts, and ensure that appropriate monetary values have been applied. We suggest four questions that can be considered when assessing resource use and the cost consequences of an option. These are: 1. What are the most important impacts on resource use? 2. What evidence is there for important impacts on resource use? 3. How confident is it possible to be in the evidence for impacts on resource use? 4. Have the impacts on resource use been valued appropriately in terms of their true costs? |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3271823 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32718232012-02-04 SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 12: Finding and using research evidence about resource use and costs Oxman, Andrew D Fretheim, Atle Lavis, John N Lewin, Simon Health Res Policy Syst Guide This article is part of a series written for people responsible for making decisions about health policies and programmes and for those who support these decision makers. In this article, we address considerations about resource use and costs. The consequences of a policy or programme option for resource use differ from other impacts (both in terms of benefits and harms) in several ways. However, considerations of the consequences of options for resource use are similar to considerations related to other impacts in that policymakers and their staff need to identify important impacts on resource use, acquire and appraise the best available evidence regarding those impacts, and ensure that appropriate monetary values have been applied. We suggest four questions that can be considered when assessing resource use and the cost consequences of an option. These are: 1. What are the most important impacts on resource use? 2. What evidence is there for important impacts on resource use? 3. How confident is it possible to be in the evidence for impacts on resource use? 4. Have the impacts on resource use been valued appropriately in terms of their true costs? BioMed Central 2009-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3271823/ /pubmed/20018102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S12 Text en Copyright ©2009 Oxman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Guide Oxman, Andrew D Fretheim, Atle Lavis, John N Lewin, Simon SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 12: Finding and using research evidence about resource use and costs |
title | SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 12: Finding and using research evidence about resource use and costs |
title_full | SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 12: Finding and using research evidence about resource use and costs |
title_fullStr | SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 12: Finding and using research evidence about resource use and costs |
title_full_unstemmed | SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 12: Finding and using research evidence about resource use and costs |
title_short | SUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 12: Finding and using research evidence about resource use and costs |
title_sort | support tools for evidence-informed health policymaking (stp) 12: finding and using research evidence about resource use and costs |
topic | Guide |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3271823/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20018102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S12 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oxmanandrewd supporttoolsforevidenceinformedhealthpolicymakingstp12findingandusingresearchevidenceaboutresourceuseandcosts AT fretheimatle supporttoolsforevidenceinformedhealthpolicymakingstp12findingandusingresearchevidenceaboutresourceuseandcosts AT lavisjohnn supporttoolsforevidenceinformedhealthpolicymakingstp12findingandusingresearchevidenceaboutresourceuseandcosts AT lewinsimon supporttoolsforevidenceinformedhealthpolicymakingstp12findingandusingresearchevidenceaboutresourceuseandcosts |