Cargando…
SUPPORT Tools for Evidence-informed Policymaking in health 18: Planning monitoring and evaluation of policies
This article is part of a series written for people responsible for making decisions about health policies and programmes and for those who support these decision makers. The term monitoring is commonly used to describe the process of systematically collecting data to inform policymakers, managers a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3271828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20018108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S18 |
_version_ | 1782222757045469184 |
---|---|
author | Fretheim, Atle Oxman, Andrew D Lavis, John N Lewin, Simon |
author_facet | Fretheim, Atle Oxman, Andrew D Lavis, John N Lewin, Simon |
author_sort | Fretheim, Atle |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article is part of a series written for people responsible for making decisions about health policies and programmes and for those who support these decision makers. The term monitoring is commonly used to describe the process of systematically collecting data to inform policymakers, managers and other stakeholders whether a new policy or programme is being implemented in accordance with their expectations. Indicators are used for monitoring purposes to judge, for example, if objectives are being achieved, or if allocated funds are being spent appropriately. Sometimes the term evaluation is used interchangeably with the term monitoring, but the former usually suggests a stronger focus on the achievement of results. When the term impact evaluation is used, this usually implies that there is a specific attempt to try to determine whether the observed changes in outcomes can be attributed to a particular policy or programme. In this article, we suggest four questions that can be used to guide the monitoring and evaluation of policy or programme options. These are: 1. Is monitoring necessary? 2. What should be measured? 3. Should an impact evaluation be conducted? 4. How should the impact evaluation be done? |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3271828 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32718282012-02-04 SUPPORT Tools for Evidence-informed Policymaking in health 18: Planning monitoring and evaluation of policies Fretheim, Atle Oxman, Andrew D Lavis, John N Lewin, Simon Health Res Policy Syst Guide This article is part of a series written for people responsible for making decisions about health policies and programmes and for those who support these decision makers. The term monitoring is commonly used to describe the process of systematically collecting data to inform policymakers, managers and other stakeholders whether a new policy or programme is being implemented in accordance with their expectations. Indicators are used for monitoring purposes to judge, for example, if objectives are being achieved, or if allocated funds are being spent appropriately. Sometimes the term evaluation is used interchangeably with the term monitoring, but the former usually suggests a stronger focus on the achievement of results. When the term impact evaluation is used, this usually implies that there is a specific attempt to try to determine whether the observed changes in outcomes can be attributed to a particular policy or programme. In this article, we suggest four questions that can be used to guide the monitoring and evaluation of policy or programme options. These are: 1. Is monitoring necessary? 2. What should be measured? 3. Should an impact evaluation be conducted? 4. How should the impact evaluation be done? BioMed Central 2009-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3271828/ /pubmed/20018108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S18 Text en Copyright ©2009 Fretheim et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Guide Fretheim, Atle Oxman, Andrew D Lavis, John N Lewin, Simon SUPPORT Tools for Evidence-informed Policymaking in health 18: Planning monitoring and evaluation of policies |
title | SUPPORT Tools for Evidence-informed Policymaking in health 18: Planning monitoring and evaluation of policies |
title_full | SUPPORT Tools for Evidence-informed Policymaking in health 18: Planning monitoring and evaluation of policies |
title_fullStr | SUPPORT Tools for Evidence-informed Policymaking in health 18: Planning monitoring and evaluation of policies |
title_full_unstemmed | SUPPORT Tools for Evidence-informed Policymaking in health 18: Planning monitoring and evaluation of policies |
title_short | SUPPORT Tools for Evidence-informed Policymaking in health 18: Planning monitoring and evaluation of policies |
title_sort | support tools for evidence-informed policymaking in health 18: planning monitoring and evaluation of policies |
topic | Guide |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3271828/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20018108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S18 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fretheimatle supporttoolsforevidenceinformedpolicymakinginhealth18planningmonitoringandevaluationofpolicies AT oxmanandrewd supporttoolsforevidenceinformedpolicymakinginhealth18planningmonitoringandevaluationofpolicies AT lavisjohnn supporttoolsforevidenceinformedpolicymakinginhealth18planningmonitoringandevaluationofpolicies AT lewinsimon supporttoolsforevidenceinformedpolicymakinginhealth18planningmonitoringandevaluationofpolicies |