Cargando…
The Buncefield Oil Depot Fire of 2005: Potential Air-Pollution Health Impacts Under Alternative Meteorological Scenarios
Objective: To model the possible air pollution-related health impact of the 2005 oil depot fire at Buncefield, near London, UK, under alternative meteorological conditions to those experienced at the time. Design: Atmospheric dispersion modelling of the smoke plume was conducted under the range of m...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3271948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22453896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/currents.RRN1300 |
_version_ | 1782222760037056512 |
---|---|
author | Mohan, Richard Walton, Heather A. Thomson, David Webster, Helen Wilkinson, Paul Grundy, Chris Murray, Virginia Leonardi, Giovanni |
author_facet | Mohan, Richard Walton, Heather A. Thomson, David Webster, Helen Wilkinson, Paul Grundy, Chris Murray, Virginia Leonardi, Giovanni |
author_sort | Mohan, Richard |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: To model the possible air pollution-related health impact of the 2005 oil depot fire at Buncefield, near London, UK, under alternative meteorological conditions to those experienced at the time. Design: Atmospheric dispersion modelling of the smoke plume was conducted under the range of meteorological conditions occurring throughout 2005 assuming constant particle emission rates. Population exposure to particle concentrations (PM10) was calculated by linking the atmospheric dispersion modelling data (2 km resolution) and postcode population data. Health impacts were estimated using time-series-based exposure-response relationships for PM10 available from the epidemiological literature. Main outcomes: Estimates of pollution-related deaths brought forward, emergency hospital admissions from respiratory problems and emergency hospital admissions from cardiovascular disease. Findings: The highest four-day population exposure to PM10 for meteorological data from 2005 was predicted to occur between 5 and 8 August 2005, when northerly winds would have carried the plume towards London and surrounding areas of high population density. On these days, we estimated the additional PM10 exposure would have resulted in around 12 extra deaths brought forward, and around 13 additional emergency hospital admissions and a similar additional number of emergency admissions for cardiovascular disease. These numbers are slightly greater than estimated deaths and emergency admissions attributable to regular anthropogenic PM10 concentrations in south east England over the same four day period. Conclusions: Although the particle pollution-related health impacts of the Buncefield fire could have been higher under different meteorological conditions, it is unlikely that the impacts would be substantially greater than those attributable to regular anthropogenic particle pollution over the similar period. Keywords: oil depot fire; health impact; epidemiology; air pollution; explosion; atmospheric dispersion modelling; exposure |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3271948 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32719482012-03-13 The Buncefield Oil Depot Fire of 2005: Potential Air-Pollution Health Impacts Under Alternative Meteorological Scenarios Mohan, Richard Walton, Heather A. Thomson, David Webster, Helen Wilkinson, Paul Grundy, Chris Murray, Virginia Leonardi, Giovanni PLoS Curr Disasters Objective: To model the possible air pollution-related health impact of the 2005 oil depot fire at Buncefield, near London, UK, under alternative meteorological conditions to those experienced at the time. Design: Atmospheric dispersion modelling of the smoke plume was conducted under the range of meteorological conditions occurring throughout 2005 assuming constant particle emission rates. Population exposure to particle concentrations (PM10) was calculated by linking the atmospheric dispersion modelling data (2 km resolution) and postcode population data. Health impacts were estimated using time-series-based exposure-response relationships for PM10 available from the epidemiological literature. Main outcomes: Estimates of pollution-related deaths brought forward, emergency hospital admissions from respiratory problems and emergency hospital admissions from cardiovascular disease. Findings: The highest four-day population exposure to PM10 for meteorological data from 2005 was predicted to occur between 5 and 8 August 2005, when northerly winds would have carried the plume towards London and surrounding areas of high population density. On these days, we estimated the additional PM10 exposure would have resulted in around 12 extra deaths brought forward, and around 13 additional emergency hospital admissions and a similar additional number of emergency admissions for cardiovascular disease. These numbers are slightly greater than estimated deaths and emergency admissions attributable to regular anthropogenic PM10 concentrations in south east England over the same four day period. Conclusions: Although the particle pollution-related health impacts of the Buncefield fire could have been higher under different meteorological conditions, it is unlikely that the impacts would be substantially greater than those attributable to regular anthropogenic particle pollution over the similar period. Keywords: oil depot fire; health impact; epidemiology; air pollution; explosion; atmospheric dispersion modelling; exposure Public Library of Science 2012-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3271948/ /pubmed/22453896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/currents.RRN1300 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Disasters Mohan, Richard Walton, Heather A. Thomson, David Webster, Helen Wilkinson, Paul Grundy, Chris Murray, Virginia Leonardi, Giovanni The Buncefield Oil Depot Fire of 2005: Potential Air-Pollution Health Impacts Under Alternative Meteorological Scenarios |
title | The Buncefield Oil Depot Fire of 2005: Potential Air-Pollution Health Impacts Under Alternative Meteorological Scenarios |
title_full | The Buncefield Oil Depot Fire of 2005: Potential Air-Pollution Health Impacts Under Alternative Meteorological Scenarios |
title_fullStr | The Buncefield Oil Depot Fire of 2005: Potential Air-Pollution Health Impacts Under Alternative Meteorological Scenarios |
title_full_unstemmed | The Buncefield Oil Depot Fire of 2005: Potential Air-Pollution Health Impacts Under Alternative Meteorological Scenarios |
title_short | The Buncefield Oil Depot Fire of 2005: Potential Air-Pollution Health Impacts Under Alternative Meteorological Scenarios |
title_sort | buncefield oil depot fire of 2005: potential air-pollution health impacts under alternative meteorological scenarios |
topic | Disasters |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3271948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22453896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/currents.RRN1300 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohanrichard thebuncefieldoildepotfireof2005potentialairpollutionhealthimpactsunderalternativemeteorologicalscenarios AT waltonheathera thebuncefieldoildepotfireof2005potentialairpollutionhealthimpactsunderalternativemeteorologicalscenarios AT thomsondavid thebuncefieldoildepotfireof2005potentialairpollutionhealthimpactsunderalternativemeteorologicalscenarios AT websterhelen thebuncefieldoildepotfireof2005potentialairpollutionhealthimpactsunderalternativemeteorologicalscenarios AT wilkinsonpaul thebuncefieldoildepotfireof2005potentialairpollutionhealthimpactsunderalternativemeteorologicalscenarios AT grundychris thebuncefieldoildepotfireof2005potentialairpollutionhealthimpactsunderalternativemeteorologicalscenarios AT murrayvirginia thebuncefieldoildepotfireof2005potentialairpollutionhealthimpactsunderalternativemeteorologicalscenarios AT leonardigiovanni thebuncefieldoildepotfireof2005potentialairpollutionhealthimpactsunderalternativemeteorologicalscenarios AT mohanrichard buncefieldoildepotfireof2005potentialairpollutionhealthimpactsunderalternativemeteorologicalscenarios AT waltonheathera buncefieldoildepotfireof2005potentialairpollutionhealthimpactsunderalternativemeteorologicalscenarios AT thomsondavid buncefieldoildepotfireof2005potentialairpollutionhealthimpactsunderalternativemeteorologicalscenarios AT websterhelen buncefieldoildepotfireof2005potentialairpollutionhealthimpactsunderalternativemeteorologicalscenarios AT wilkinsonpaul buncefieldoildepotfireof2005potentialairpollutionhealthimpactsunderalternativemeteorologicalscenarios AT grundychris buncefieldoildepotfireof2005potentialairpollutionhealthimpactsunderalternativemeteorologicalscenarios AT murrayvirginia buncefieldoildepotfireof2005potentialairpollutionhealthimpactsunderalternativemeteorologicalscenarios AT leonardigiovanni buncefieldoildepotfireof2005potentialairpollutionhealthimpactsunderalternativemeteorologicalscenarios |