Cargando…
Prediction of Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: Evaluation of the Tenon Score
INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines recommend completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) in case of a sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis larger than 0.2 mm. However, in 50%–65% of these patients, the non-SLNs contain no further metastases and cALND provides no benefit. Several nomograms and sc...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Libertas Academica
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3273320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22346360 http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/BCBCR.S8642 |
_version_ | 1782222919900856320 |
---|---|
author | Andersson, Y Frisell, J de Boniface, J Bergkvist, L |
author_facet | Andersson, Y Frisell, J de Boniface, J Bergkvist, L |
author_sort | Andersson, Y |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines recommend completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) in case of a sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis larger than 0.2 mm. However, in 50%–65% of these patients, the non-SLNs contain no further metastases and cALND provides no benefit. Several nomograms and scoring systems have been suggested to predict the risk of metastases in non-SLNs. We have evaluated the Tenon score. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective review of the Swedish Sentinel Node Multicentre Cohort Study, risk factors for additional metastases were analysed in 869 SLN-positive patients who underwent cALND, using uni- and multivariate logistic regression models. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn on the basis of the sensitivity and specificity of the Tenon score, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. RESULTS: Non-SLN metastases were identified in 270/869 (31.1%) patients. Tumour size and grade, SLN status and ratio between number of positive SLNs and total number of SLNs were significantly associated with non-SLN status in multivariate analyses. The area under the curve for the Tenon score was 0.65 (95% CI 0.61–0.69). In 102 patients with a primary tumour <2 cm, Elston grade 1–2 and SLN metastases ≤2 mm, the risk of non SLN metastasis was less than 10%. CONCLUSION: The Tenon score performed inadequately in our material and we could, based on tumour and SLN characteristics, only define a very small group of patients in which negative non-sentinel nodes could be predicted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3273320 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Libertas Academica |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32733202012-02-16 Prediction of Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: Evaluation of the Tenon Score Andersson, Y Frisell, J de Boniface, J Bergkvist, L Breast Cancer (Auckl) Original Research INTRODUCTION: Current guidelines recommend completion axillary lymph node dissection (cALND) in case of a sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis larger than 0.2 mm. However, in 50%–65% of these patients, the non-SLNs contain no further metastases and cALND provides no benefit. Several nomograms and scoring systems have been suggested to predict the risk of metastases in non-SLNs. We have evaluated the Tenon score. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective review of the Swedish Sentinel Node Multicentre Cohort Study, risk factors for additional metastases were analysed in 869 SLN-positive patients who underwent cALND, using uni- and multivariate logistic regression models. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn on the basis of the sensitivity and specificity of the Tenon score, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. RESULTS: Non-SLN metastases were identified in 270/869 (31.1%) patients. Tumour size and grade, SLN status and ratio between number of positive SLNs and total number of SLNs were significantly associated with non-SLN status in multivariate analyses. The area under the curve for the Tenon score was 0.65 (95% CI 0.61–0.69). In 102 patients with a primary tumour <2 cm, Elston grade 1–2 and SLN metastases ≤2 mm, the risk of non SLN metastasis was less than 10%. CONCLUSION: The Tenon score performed inadequately in our material and we could, based on tumour and SLN characteristics, only define a very small group of patients in which negative non-sentinel nodes could be predicted. Libertas Academica 2012-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3273320/ /pubmed/22346360 http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/BCBCR.S8642 Text en © the author(s), publisher and licensee Libertas Academica Ltd. This is an open access article. Unrestricted non-commercial use is permitted provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Andersson, Y Frisell, J de Boniface, J Bergkvist, L Prediction of Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: Evaluation of the Tenon Score |
title | Prediction of Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: Evaluation of the Tenon Score |
title_full | Prediction of Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: Evaluation of the Tenon Score |
title_fullStr | Prediction of Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: Evaluation of the Tenon Score |
title_full_unstemmed | Prediction of Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: Evaluation of the Tenon Score |
title_short | Prediction of Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Breast Cancer Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Metastases: Evaluation of the Tenon Score |
title_sort | prediction of non-sentinel lymph node status in breast cancer patients with sentinel lymph node metastases: evaluation of the tenon score |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3273320/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22346360 http://dx.doi.org/10.4137/BCBCR.S8642 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anderssony predictionofnonsentinellymphnodestatusinbreastcancerpatientswithsentinellymphnodemetastasesevaluationofthetenonscore AT frisellj predictionofnonsentinellymphnodestatusinbreastcancerpatientswithsentinellymphnodemetastasesevaluationofthetenonscore AT debonifacej predictionofnonsentinellymphnodestatusinbreastcancerpatientswithsentinellymphnodemetastasesevaluationofthetenonscore AT bergkvistl predictionofnonsentinellymphnodestatusinbreastcancerpatientswithsentinellymphnodemetastasesevaluationofthetenonscore |