Cargando…

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial

BACKGROUND: In patients with suspected coronary heart disease, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is the most widely used test for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia, but its diagnostic accuracy is reported to be variable and it exposes patients to ionising radiation. The aim of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greenwood, John P, Maredia, Neil, Younger, John F, Brown, Julia M, Nixon, Jane, Everett, Colin C, Bijsterveld, Petra, Ridgway, John P, Radjenovic, Aleksandra, Dickinson, Catherine J, Ball, Stephen G, Plein, Sven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lancet Publishing Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3273722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22196944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61335-4
_version_ 1782222958059585536
author Greenwood, John P
Maredia, Neil
Younger, John F
Brown, Julia M
Nixon, Jane
Everett, Colin C
Bijsterveld, Petra
Ridgway, John P
Radjenovic, Aleksandra
Dickinson, Catherine J
Ball, Stephen G
Plein, Sven
author_facet Greenwood, John P
Maredia, Neil
Younger, John F
Brown, Julia M
Nixon, Jane
Everett, Colin C
Bijsterveld, Petra
Ridgway, John P
Radjenovic, Aleksandra
Dickinson, Catherine J
Ball, Stephen G
Plein, Sven
author_sort Greenwood, John P
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In patients with suspected coronary heart disease, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is the most widely used test for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia, but its diagnostic accuracy is reported to be variable and it exposes patients to ionising radiation. The aim of this study was to establish the diagnostic accuracy of a multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocol with x-ray coronary angiography as the reference standard, and to compare CMR with SPECT, in patients with suspected coronary heart disease. METHODS: In this prospective trial patients with suspected angina pectoris and at least one cardiovascular risk factor were scheduled for CMR, SPECT, and invasive x-ray coronary angiography. CMR consisted of rest and adenosine stress perfusion, cine imaging, late gadolinium enhancement, and MR coronary angiography. Gated adenosine stress and rest SPECT used (99m)Tc tetrofosmin. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of CMR. This trial is registered at controlled-trials.com, number ISRCTN77246133. FINDINGS: In the 752 recruited patients, 39% had significant CHD as identified by x-ray angiography. For multiparametric CMR the sensitivity was 86·5% (95% CI 81·8–90·1), specificity 83·4% (79·5–86·7), positive predictive value 77·2%, (72·1–81·6) and negative predictive value 90·5% (87·1–93·0). The sensitivity of SPECT was 66·5% (95% CI 60·4–72·1), specificity 82·6% (78·5–86·1), positive predictive value 71·4% (65·3–76·9), and negative predictive value 79·1% (74·8–82·8). The sensitivity and negative predictive value of CMR and SPECT differed significantly (p<0·0001 for both) but specificity and positive predictive value did not (p=0·916 and p=0·061, respectively). INTERPRETATION: CE-MARC is the largest, prospective, real world evaluation of CMR and has established CMR's high diagnostic accuracy in coronary heart disease and CMR's superiority over SPECT. It should be adopted more widely than at present for the investigation of coronary heart disease. FUNDING: British Heart Foundation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3273722
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Lancet Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32737222012-02-24 Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial Greenwood, John P Maredia, Neil Younger, John F Brown, Julia M Nixon, Jane Everett, Colin C Bijsterveld, Petra Ridgway, John P Radjenovic, Aleksandra Dickinson, Catherine J Ball, Stephen G Plein, Sven Lancet Articles BACKGROUND: In patients with suspected coronary heart disease, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is the most widely used test for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia, but its diagnostic accuracy is reported to be variable and it exposes patients to ionising radiation. The aim of this study was to establish the diagnostic accuracy of a multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocol with x-ray coronary angiography as the reference standard, and to compare CMR with SPECT, in patients with suspected coronary heart disease. METHODS: In this prospective trial patients with suspected angina pectoris and at least one cardiovascular risk factor were scheduled for CMR, SPECT, and invasive x-ray coronary angiography. CMR consisted of rest and adenosine stress perfusion, cine imaging, late gadolinium enhancement, and MR coronary angiography. Gated adenosine stress and rest SPECT used (99m)Tc tetrofosmin. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of CMR. This trial is registered at controlled-trials.com, number ISRCTN77246133. FINDINGS: In the 752 recruited patients, 39% had significant CHD as identified by x-ray angiography. For multiparametric CMR the sensitivity was 86·5% (95% CI 81·8–90·1), specificity 83·4% (79·5–86·7), positive predictive value 77·2%, (72·1–81·6) and negative predictive value 90·5% (87·1–93·0). The sensitivity of SPECT was 66·5% (95% CI 60·4–72·1), specificity 82·6% (78·5–86·1), positive predictive value 71·4% (65·3–76·9), and negative predictive value 79·1% (74·8–82·8). The sensitivity and negative predictive value of CMR and SPECT differed significantly (p<0·0001 for both) but specificity and positive predictive value did not (p=0·916 and p=0·061, respectively). INTERPRETATION: CE-MARC is the largest, prospective, real world evaluation of CMR and has established CMR's high diagnostic accuracy in coronary heart disease and CMR's superiority over SPECT. It should be adopted more widely than at present for the investigation of coronary heart disease. FUNDING: British Heart Foundation. Lancet Publishing Group 2012-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3273722/ /pubmed/22196944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61335-4 Text en © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions (http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/authorsview.authors/supplementalterms1.0) .
spellingShingle Articles
Greenwood, John P
Maredia, Neil
Younger, John F
Brown, Julia M
Nixon, Jane
Everett, Colin C
Bijsterveld, Petra
Ridgway, John P
Radjenovic, Aleksandra
Dickinson, Catherine J
Ball, Stephen G
Plein, Sven
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial
title Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial
title_full Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial
title_fullStr Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial
title_full_unstemmed Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial
title_short Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial
title_sort cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (ce-marc): a prospective trial
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3273722/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22196944
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61335-4
work_keys_str_mv AT greenwoodjohnp cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial
AT maredianeil cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial
AT youngerjohnf cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial
AT brownjuliam cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial
AT nixonjane cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial
AT everettcolinc cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial
AT bijsterveldpetra cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial
AT ridgwayjohnp cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial
AT radjenovicaleksandra cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial
AT dickinsoncatherinej cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial
AT ballstepheng cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial
AT pleinsven cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial