Cargando…
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial
BACKGROUND: In patients with suspected coronary heart disease, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is the most widely used test for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia, but its diagnostic accuracy is reported to be variable and it exposes patients to ionising radiation. The aim of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lancet Publishing Group
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3273722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22196944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61335-4 |
_version_ | 1782222958059585536 |
---|---|
author | Greenwood, John P Maredia, Neil Younger, John F Brown, Julia M Nixon, Jane Everett, Colin C Bijsterveld, Petra Ridgway, John P Radjenovic, Aleksandra Dickinson, Catherine J Ball, Stephen G Plein, Sven |
author_facet | Greenwood, John P Maredia, Neil Younger, John F Brown, Julia M Nixon, Jane Everett, Colin C Bijsterveld, Petra Ridgway, John P Radjenovic, Aleksandra Dickinson, Catherine J Ball, Stephen G Plein, Sven |
author_sort | Greenwood, John P |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In patients with suspected coronary heart disease, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is the most widely used test for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia, but its diagnostic accuracy is reported to be variable and it exposes patients to ionising radiation. The aim of this study was to establish the diagnostic accuracy of a multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocol with x-ray coronary angiography as the reference standard, and to compare CMR with SPECT, in patients with suspected coronary heart disease. METHODS: In this prospective trial patients with suspected angina pectoris and at least one cardiovascular risk factor were scheduled for CMR, SPECT, and invasive x-ray coronary angiography. CMR consisted of rest and adenosine stress perfusion, cine imaging, late gadolinium enhancement, and MR coronary angiography. Gated adenosine stress and rest SPECT used (99m)Tc tetrofosmin. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of CMR. This trial is registered at controlled-trials.com, number ISRCTN77246133. FINDINGS: In the 752 recruited patients, 39% had significant CHD as identified by x-ray angiography. For multiparametric CMR the sensitivity was 86·5% (95% CI 81·8–90·1), specificity 83·4% (79·5–86·7), positive predictive value 77·2%, (72·1–81·6) and negative predictive value 90·5% (87·1–93·0). The sensitivity of SPECT was 66·5% (95% CI 60·4–72·1), specificity 82·6% (78·5–86·1), positive predictive value 71·4% (65·3–76·9), and negative predictive value 79·1% (74·8–82·8). The sensitivity and negative predictive value of CMR and SPECT differed significantly (p<0·0001 for both) but specificity and positive predictive value did not (p=0·916 and p=0·061, respectively). INTERPRETATION: CE-MARC is the largest, prospective, real world evaluation of CMR and has established CMR's high diagnostic accuracy in coronary heart disease and CMR's superiority over SPECT. It should be adopted more widely than at present for the investigation of coronary heart disease. FUNDING: British Heart Foundation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3273722 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Lancet Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32737222012-02-24 Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial Greenwood, John P Maredia, Neil Younger, John F Brown, Julia M Nixon, Jane Everett, Colin C Bijsterveld, Petra Ridgway, John P Radjenovic, Aleksandra Dickinson, Catherine J Ball, Stephen G Plein, Sven Lancet Articles BACKGROUND: In patients with suspected coronary heart disease, single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is the most widely used test for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia, but its diagnostic accuracy is reported to be variable and it exposes patients to ionising radiation. The aim of this study was to establish the diagnostic accuracy of a multiparametric cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) protocol with x-ray coronary angiography as the reference standard, and to compare CMR with SPECT, in patients with suspected coronary heart disease. METHODS: In this prospective trial patients with suspected angina pectoris and at least one cardiovascular risk factor were scheduled for CMR, SPECT, and invasive x-ray coronary angiography. CMR consisted of rest and adenosine stress perfusion, cine imaging, late gadolinium enhancement, and MR coronary angiography. Gated adenosine stress and rest SPECT used (99m)Tc tetrofosmin. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy of CMR. This trial is registered at controlled-trials.com, number ISRCTN77246133. FINDINGS: In the 752 recruited patients, 39% had significant CHD as identified by x-ray angiography. For multiparametric CMR the sensitivity was 86·5% (95% CI 81·8–90·1), specificity 83·4% (79·5–86·7), positive predictive value 77·2%, (72·1–81·6) and negative predictive value 90·5% (87·1–93·0). The sensitivity of SPECT was 66·5% (95% CI 60·4–72·1), specificity 82·6% (78·5–86·1), positive predictive value 71·4% (65·3–76·9), and negative predictive value 79·1% (74·8–82·8). The sensitivity and negative predictive value of CMR and SPECT differed significantly (p<0·0001 for both) but specificity and positive predictive value did not (p=0·916 and p=0·061, respectively). INTERPRETATION: CE-MARC is the largest, prospective, real world evaluation of CMR and has established CMR's high diagnostic accuracy in coronary heart disease and CMR's superiority over SPECT. It should be adopted more widely than at present for the investigation of coronary heart disease. FUNDING: British Heart Foundation. Lancet Publishing Group 2012-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC3273722/ /pubmed/22196944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61335-4 Text en © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions (http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/authorsview.authors/supplementalterms1.0) . |
spellingShingle | Articles Greenwood, John P Maredia, Neil Younger, John F Brown, Julia M Nixon, Jane Everett, Colin C Bijsterveld, Petra Ridgway, John P Radjenovic, Aleksandra Dickinson, Catherine J Ball, Stephen G Plein, Sven Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial |
title | Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial |
title_full | Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial |
title_fullStr | Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial |
title_short | Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial |
title_sort | cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (ce-marc): a prospective trial |
topic | Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3273722/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22196944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61335-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT greenwoodjohnp cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial AT maredianeil cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial AT youngerjohnf cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial AT brownjuliam cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial AT nixonjane cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial AT everettcolinc cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial AT bijsterveldpetra cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial AT ridgwayjohnp cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial AT radjenovicaleksandra cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial AT dickinsoncatherinej cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial AT ballstepheng cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial AT pleinsven cardiovascularmagneticresonanceandsinglephotonemissioncomputedtomographyfordiagnosisofcoronaryheartdiseasecemarcaprospectivetrial |