Cargando…

Preliminary comp arison of helical tomotherapy and mixed beams of unmodulated electrons and intensity modulated radiation therapy for treating superficial cancers of the parotid gland and nasal cavity

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate combining unmodulated electron beams with intensity-modulated radiation therapy to improve dose distributions for superficial head and neck cancers, and to compare mixed beam plans with helical tomotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mixed beam and helical tomother...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blasi, Olivier, Fontenot, Jonas D, Fields, Robert S, Gibbons, John P, Hogstrom, Kenneth R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3274488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22204477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-178
_version_ 1782223078845054976
author Blasi, Olivier
Fontenot, Jonas D
Fields, Robert S
Gibbons, John P
Hogstrom, Kenneth R
author_facet Blasi, Olivier
Fontenot, Jonas D
Fields, Robert S
Gibbons, John P
Hogstrom, Kenneth R
author_sort Blasi, Olivier
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate combining unmodulated electron beams with intensity-modulated radiation therapy to improve dose distributions for superficial head and neck cancers, and to compare mixed beam plans with helical tomotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mixed beam and helical tomotherapy dose plans were developed for two patients with parotid gland tumors and two patients with nasal cavity tumors. Mixed beam plans consisted of various weightings of a enface electron beam and IMRT, which was optimized after calculation of the electron dose to compensate for heterogeneity in the electron dose distribution within the target volume. RESULTS: Helical tomotherapy plans showed dose conformity and homogeneity in the target volume that was equal to or better than the mixed beam plans. Electron-only plans tended to show the lowest doses to normal tissues, but with markedly worse dose conformity and homogeneity than in the other plans. However, adding a 20% IMRT dose fraction (i.e., IMRT:electron weighting = 1:4) to the electron plan restored target conformity and homogeneity to values comparable to helical tomotherapy plans, while maintaining lower normal tissue dose. CONCLUSIONS: Mixed beam treatments offer some dosimetric advantages over IMRT or helical tomotherapy for target depths that do not exceed the useful range of the electron beam. Adding a small IMRT component (e.g., IMRT:electron weighting = 1:4) to electron beam plans markedly improved target dose homogeneity and conformity for the cases examined in this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3274488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32744882012-02-13 Preliminary comp arison of helical tomotherapy and mixed beams of unmodulated electrons and intensity modulated radiation therapy for treating superficial cancers of the parotid gland and nasal cavity Blasi, Olivier Fontenot, Jonas D Fields, Robert S Gibbons, John P Hogstrom, Kenneth R Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To investigate combining unmodulated electron beams with intensity-modulated radiation therapy to improve dose distributions for superficial head and neck cancers, and to compare mixed beam plans with helical tomotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mixed beam and helical tomotherapy dose plans were developed for two patients with parotid gland tumors and two patients with nasal cavity tumors. Mixed beam plans consisted of various weightings of a enface electron beam and IMRT, which was optimized after calculation of the electron dose to compensate for heterogeneity in the electron dose distribution within the target volume. RESULTS: Helical tomotherapy plans showed dose conformity and homogeneity in the target volume that was equal to or better than the mixed beam plans. Electron-only plans tended to show the lowest doses to normal tissues, but with markedly worse dose conformity and homogeneity than in the other plans. However, adding a 20% IMRT dose fraction (i.e., IMRT:electron weighting = 1:4) to the electron plan restored target conformity and homogeneity to values comparable to helical tomotherapy plans, while maintaining lower normal tissue dose. CONCLUSIONS: Mixed beam treatments offer some dosimetric advantages over IMRT or helical tomotherapy for target depths that do not exceed the useful range of the electron beam. Adding a small IMRT component (e.g., IMRT:electron weighting = 1:4) to electron beam plans markedly improved target dose homogeneity and conformity for the cases examined in this study. BioMed Central 2011-12-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3274488/ /pubmed/22204477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-178 Text en Copyright ©2011 Blasi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Blasi, Olivier
Fontenot, Jonas D
Fields, Robert S
Gibbons, John P
Hogstrom, Kenneth R
Preliminary comp arison of helical tomotherapy and mixed beams of unmodulated electrons and intensity modulated radiation therapy for treating superficial cancers of the parotid gland and nasal cavity
title Preliminary comp arison of helical tomotherapy and mixed beams of unmodulated electrons and intensity modulated radiation therapy for treating superficial cancers of the parotid gland and nasal cavity
title_full Preliminary comp arison of helical tomotherapy and mixed beams of unmodulated electrons and intensity modulated radiation therapy for treating superficial cancers of the parotid gland and nasal cavity
title_fullStr Preliminary comp arison of helical tomotherapy and mixed beams of unmodulated electrons and intensity modulated radiation therapy for treating superficial cancers of the parotid gland and nasal cavity
title_full_unstemmed Preliminary comp arison of helical tomotherapy and mixed beams of unmodulated electrons and intensity modulated radiation therapy for treating superficial cancers of the parotid gland and nasal cavity
title_short Preliminary comp arison of helical tomotherapy and mixed beams of unmodulated electrons and intensity modulated radiation therapy for treating superficial cancers of the parotid gland and nasal cavity
title_sort preliminary comp arison of helical tomotherapy and mixed beams of unmodulated electrons and intensity modulated radiation therapy for treating superficial cancers of the parotid gland and nasal cavity
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3274488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22204477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-6-178
work_keys_str_mv AT blasiolivier preliminarycomparisonofhelicaltomotherapyandmixedbeamsofunmodulatedelectronsandintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyfortreatingsuperficialcancersoftheparotidglandandnasalcavity
AT fontenotjonasd preliminarycomparisonofhelicaltomotherapyandmixedbeamsofunmodulatedelectronsandintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyfortreatingsuperficialcancersoftheparotidglandandnasalcavity
AT fieldsroberts preliminarycomparisonofhelicaltomotherapyandmixedbeamsofunmodulatedelectronsandintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyfortreatingsuperficialcancersoftheparotidglandandnasalcavity
AT gibbonsjohnp preliminarycomparisonofhelicaltomotherapyandmixedbeamsofunmodulatedelectronsandintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyfortreatingsuperficialcancersoftheparotidglandandnasalcavity
AT hogstromkennethr preliminarycomparisonofhelicaltomotherapyandmixedbeamsofunmodulatedelectronsandintensitymodulatedradiationtherapyfortreatingsuperficialcancersoftheparotidglandandnasalcavity