Cargando…
Validation of the PHQ-15 for Somatoform Disorder in the Occupational Health Care Setting
Introduction Within the occupational health setting, somatoform disorders are a frequent cause of sick leave. Few validated screening questionnaires for these disorders are available. The aim of this study is to validate the PHQ-15 in this setting. Methods In a cross-sectional study of 236 sickliste...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3274689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21785907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9320-6 |
_version_ | 1782223103327207424 |
---|---|
author | de Vroege, Lars Hoedeman, Rob Nuyen, Jasper Sijtsma, Klaas van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina M. |
author_facet | de Vroege, Lars Hoedeman, Rob Nuyen, Jasper Sijtsma, Klaas van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina M. |
author_sort | de Vroege, Lars |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction Within the occupational health setting, somatoform disorders are a frequent cause of sick leave. Few validated screening questionnaires for these disorders are available. The aim of this study is to validate the PHQ-15 in this setting. Methods In a cross-sectional study of 236 sicklisted employees, we studied the performance of the PHQ-15 in comparison with the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) as golden reference standard. We approached employees who were sick listed for a period longer than 6 weeks and shorter than 2 years for participation. This study was conducted on one location of a large occupation health service in the Netherlands, serving companies with more than 500 employees. All employees who returned the PHQ-15 were invited for the MINI interview. Specificity and sensitivity were calculated for optimal cut point and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was constructed. Results A total of 107 participants consented to participate in the MINI interview. A non-response analysis showed no significant differences between groups. According to the MINI, the prevalence of somatoform disorders was 21.5%, and the most frequent found disorder was a pain disorder. The PHQ-15 had an optimal cut point of 9 (patients scoring 9 or higher (≥9) were most likely to suffer from a somatoform disorder), with specificity and sensitivity equal to 61.9 and 56.5%, respectively. ROCs showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.63. Conclusion The PHQ-15 shows moderate sensitivity but limited efficiency with a cut point of 9 and can be a useful questionnaire in the occupational health setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3274689 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32746892012-02-21 Validation of the PHQ-15 for Somatoform Disorder in the Occupational Health Care Setting de Vroege, Lars Hoedeman, Rob Nuyen, Jasper Sijtsma, Klaas van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina M. J Occup Rehabil Article Introduction Within the occupational health setting, somatoform disorders are a frequent cause of sick leave. Few validated screening questionnaires for these disorders are available. The aim of this study is to validate the PHQ-15 in this setting. Methods In a cross-sectional study of 236 sicklisted employees, we studied the performance of the PHQ-15 in comparison with the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) as golden reference standard. We approached employees who were sick listed for a period longer than 6 weeks and shorter than 2 years for participation. This study was conducted on one location of a large occupation health service in the Netherlands, serving companies with more than 500 employees. All employees who returned the PHQ-15 were invited for the MINI interview. Specificity and sensitivity were calculated for optimal cut point and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was constructed. Results A total of 107 participants consented to participate in the MINI interview. A non-response analysis showed no significant differences between groups. According to the MINI, the prevalence of somatoform disorders was 21.5%, and the most frequent found disorder was a pain disorder. The PHQ-15 had an optimal cut point of 9 (patients scoring 9 or higher (≥9) were most likely to suffer from a somatoform disorder), with specificity and sensitivity equal to 61.9 and 56.5%, respectively. ROCs showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.63. Conclusion The PHQ-15 shows moderate sensitivity but limited efficiency with a cut point of 9 and can be a useful questionnaire in the occupational health setting. Springer US 2011-07-22 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3274689/ /pubmed/21785907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9320-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article de Vroege, Lars Hoedeman, Rob Nuyen, Jasper Sijtsma, Klaas van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina M. Validation of the PHQ-15 for Somatoform Disorder in the Occupational Health Care Setting |
title | Validation of the PHQ-15 for Somatoform Disorder in the Occupational Health Care Setting |
title_full | Validation of the PHQ-15 for Somatoform Disorder in the Occupational Health Care Setting |
title_fullStr | Validation of the PHQ-15 for Somatoform Disorder in the Occupational Health Care Setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of the PHQ-15 for Somatoform Disorder in the Occupational Health Care Setting |
title_short | Validation of the PHQ-15 for Somatoform Disorder in the Occupational Health Care Setting |
title_sort | validation of the phq-15 for somatoform disorder in the occupational health care setting |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3274689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21785907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10926-011-9320-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT devroegelars validationofthephq15forsomatoformdisorderintheoccupationalhealthcaresetting AT hoedemanrob validationofthephq15forsomatoformdisorderintheoccupationalhealthcaresetting AT nuyenjasper validationofthephq15forsomatoformdisorderintheoccupationalhealthcaresetting AT sijtsmaklaas validationofthephq15forsomatoformdisorderintheoccupationalhealthcaresetting AT vanderfeltzcornelischristinam validationofthephq15forsomatoformdisorderintheoccupationalhealthcaresetting |