Cargando…

Emergency and surgery services of primary hospitals in the United Republic of Tanzania

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to evaluate the capacity of first-referral health facilities in Tanzania to perform basic surgical procedures. The intent was to assist in planning strategies for universal access to life-saving and disability-preventing surgical services. DESIGN: Cross-sectional...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Penoyar, Tom, Cohen, Hillary, Kibatala, P, Magoda, A, Saguti, G, Noel, L, Groth, S, Mwakyusa, D H, Cherian, M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3274714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22307096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000369
_version_ 1782223107828744192
author Penoyar, Tom
Cohen, Hillary
Kibatala, P
Magoda, A
Saguti, G
Noel, L
Groth, S
Mwakyusa, D H
Cherian, M
author_facet Penoyar, Tom
Cohen, Hillary
Kibatala, P
Magoda, A
Saguti, G
Noel, L
Groth, S
Mwakyusa, D H
Cherian, M
author_sort Penoyar, Tom
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to evaluate the capacity of first-referral health facilities in Tanzania to perform basic surgical procedures. The intent was to assist in planning strategies for universal access to life-saving and disability-preventing surgical services. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: First-referral health facilities in the United Republic of Tanzania. PARTICIPANTS: 48 health facilities. MEASURES: The WHO Tool for Situational Analysis to Assess Emergency and Essential Surgical Care was employed to capture a health facility's capacity to perform basic surgical (including obstetrics and trauma) and anaesthesia interventions by investigating four categories of data: infrastructure, human resources, interventions available and equipment. The tool queried the availability of eight types of care providers, 35 surgical interventions and 67 items of equipment. RESULTS: The 48 facilities surveyed served 18.6 million residents (46% of the population). Supplies for basic airway management were inconsistently available. Only 42% had consistent access to oxygen, and only six functioning pulse oximeters were located in all facilities surveyed. 37.5% of facilities reported both consistent running water and electricity. While very basic interventions (suturing, wound debridement, incision and drainage) were provided in nearly all facilities, more advanced life-saving procedures including chest tube thoracostomy (30/48), open fracture management (29/48) and caesarean section delivery (32/48) were not consistently available. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results in this WHO country survey, significant gaps exist in the capacity for emergency and essential surgical services in Tanzania including deficits in human resources, essential equipment and infrastructure. The information in this survey will provide a foundation for evidence-based decisions in country-level policy regarding the allocation of resources and provision of emergency and essential surgical services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3274714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32747142012-02-17 Emergency and surgery services of primary hospitals in the United Republic of Tanzania Penoyar, Tom Cohen, Hillary Kibatala, P Magoda, A Saguti, G Noel, L Groth, S Mwakyusa, D H Cherian, M BMJ Open Global Health OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to evaluate the capacity of first-referral health facilities in Tanzania to perform basic surgical procedures. The intent was to assist in planning strategies for universal access to life-saving and disability-preventing surgical services. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: First-referral health facilities in the United Republic of Tanzania. PARTICIPANTS: 48 health facilities. MEASURES: The WHO Tool for Situational Analysis to Assess Emergency and Essential Surgical Care was employed to capture a health facility's capacity to perform basic surgical (including obstetrics and trauma) and anaesthesia interventions by investigating four categories of data: infrastructure, human resources, interventions available and equipment. The tool queried the availability of eight types of care providers, 35 surgical interventions and 67 items of equipment. RESULTS: The 48 facilities surveyed served 18.6 million residents (46% of the population). Supplies for basic airway management were inconsistently available. Only 42% had consistent access to oxygen, and only six functioning pulse oximeters were located in all facilities surveyed. 37.5% of facilities reported both consistent running water and electricity. While very basic interventions (suturing, wound debridement, incision and drainage) were provided in nearly all facilities, more advanced life-saving procedures including chest tube thoracostomy (30/48), open fracture management (29/48) and caesarean section delivery (32/48) were not consistently available. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results in this WHO country survey, significant gaps exist in the capacity for emergency and essential surgical services in Tanzania including deficits in human resources, essential equipment and infrastructure. The information in this survey will provide a foundation for evidence-based decisions in country-level policy regarding the allocation of resources and provision of emergency and essential surgical services. BMJ Group 2012-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3274714/ /pubmed/22307096 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000369 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Global Health
Penoyar, Tom
Cohen, Hillary
Kibatala, P
Magoda, A
Saguti, G
Noel, L
Groth, S
Mwakyusa, D H
Cherian, M
Emergency and surgery services of primary hospitals in the United Republic of Tanzania
title Emergency and surgery services of primary hospitals in the United Republic of Tanzania
title_full Emergency and surgery services of primary hospitals in the United Republic of Tanzania
title_fullStr Emergency and surgery services of primary hospitals in the United Republic of Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Emergency and surgery services of primary hospitals in the United Republic of Tanzania
title_short Emergency and surgery services of primary hospitals in the United Republic of Tanzania
title_sort emergency and surgery services of primary hospitals in the united republic of tanzania
topic Global Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3274714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22307096
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000369
work_keys_str_mv AT penoyartom emergencyandsurgeryservicesofprimaryhospitalsintheunitedrepublicoftanzania
AT cohenhillary emergencyandsurgeryservicesofprimaryhospitalsintheunitedrepublicoftanzania
AT kibatalap emergencyandsurgeryservicesofprimaryhospitalsintheunitedrepublicoftanzania
AT magodaa emergencyandsurgeryservicesofprimaryhospitalsintheunitedrepublicoftanzania
AT sagutig emergencyandsurgeryservicesofprimaryhospitalsintheunitedrepublicoftanzania
AT noell emergencyandsurgeryservicesofprimaryhospitalsintheunitedrepublicoftanzania
AT groths emergencyandsurgeryservicesofprimaryhospitalsintheunitedrepublicoftanzania
AT mwakyusadh emergencyandsurgeryservicesofprimaryhospitalsintheunitedrepublicoftanzania
AT cherianm emergencyandsurgeryservicesofprimaryhospitalsintheunitedrepublicoftanzania