Cargando…

Evaluating the travel, physical activity and carbon impacts of a ‘natural experiment’ in the provision of new walking and cycling infrastructure: methods for the core module of the iConnect study

INTRODUCTION: Improving infrastructure to support walking and cycling is often regarded as fundamental to encouraging their widespread uptake. However, there is little evidence that specific provision of this kind has led to a significant increase in walking or cycling in practice, let alone wider i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ogilvie, David, Bull, Fiona, Cooper, Ashley, Rutter, Harry, Adams, Emma, Brand, Christian, Ghali, Karen, Jones, Tim, Mutrie, Nanette, Powell, Jane, Preston, John, Sahlqvist, Shannon, Song, Yena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3274720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22307104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000694
_version_ 1782223109255856128
author Ogilvie, David
Bull, Fiona
Cooper, Ashley
Rutter, Harry
Adams, Emma
Brand, Christian
Ghali, Karen
Jones, Tim
Mutrie, Nanette
Powell, Jane
Preston, John
Sahlqvist, Shannon
Song, Yena
author_facet Ogilvie, David
Bull, Fiona
Cooper, Ashley
Rutter, Harry
Adams, Emma
Brand, Christian
Ghali, Karen
Jones, Tim
Mutrie, Nanette
Powell, Jane
Preston, John
Sahlqvist, Shannon
Song, Yena
author_sort Ogilvie, David
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Improving infrastructure to support walking and cycling is often regarded as fundamental to encouraging their widespread uptake. However, there is little evidence that specific provision of this kind has led to a significant increase in walking or cycling in practice, let alone wider impacts such as changes in overall physical activity or carbon emissions. Connect2 is a major new project that aims to promote walking and cycling in the UK by improving local pedestrian and cycle routes. It therefore provides a useful opportunity to contribute new evidence in this field by means of a natural experimental study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: iConnect is an independent study that aims to integrate the perspectives of public health and transport research on the measurement and evaluation of the travel, physical activity and carbon impacts of the Connect2 programme. In this paper, the authors report the study design and methods for the iConnect core module. This comprised a cohort study of residents living within 5 km of three case study Connect2 projects in Cardiff, Kenilworth and Southampton, supported by a programme of qualitative interviews with key informants about the projects. Participants were asked to complete postal questionnaires, repeated before and after the opening of the new infrastructure, which collected data on demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, travel, car fuel purchasing and physical activity, and potential psychosocial and environmental correlates and mediators of those behaviours. In the absence of suitable no-intervention control groups, the study design drew on heterogeneity in exposure both within and between case study samples to provide for a counterfactual. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the University of Southampton Research Ethics Committee. The findings will be disseminated through academic presentations, peer-reviewed publications and the study website (http://www.iconnect.ac.uk) and by means of a national seminar at the end of the study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3274720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32747202012-02-17 Evaluating the travel, physical activity and carbon impacts of a ‘natural experiment’ in the provision of new walking and cycling infrastructure: methods for the core module of the iConnect study Ogilvie, David Bull, Fiona Cooper, Ashley Rutter, Harry Adams, Emma Brand, Christian Ghali, Karen Jones, Tim Mutrie, Nanette Powell, Jane Preston, John Sahlqvist, Shannon Song, Yena BMJ Open Public Health INTRODUCTION: Improving infrastructure to support walking and cycling is often regarded as fundamental to encouraging their widespread uptake. However, there is little evidence that specific provision of this kind has led to a significant increase in walking or cycling in practice, let alone wider impacts such as changes in overall physical activity or carbon emissions. Connect2 is a major new project that aims to promote walking and cycling in the UK by improving local pedestrian and cycle routes. It therefore provides a useful opportunity to contribute new evidence in this field by means of a natural experimental study. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: iConnect is an independent study that aims to integrate the perspectives of public health and transport research on the measurement and evaluation of the travel, physical activity and carbon impacts of the Connect2 programme. In this paper, the authors report the study design and methods for the iConnect core module. This comprised a cohort study of residents living within 5 km of three case study Connect2 projects in Cardiff, Kenilworth and Southampton, supported by a programme of qualitative interviews with key informants about the projects. Participants were asked to complete postal questionnaires, repeated before and after the opening of the new infrastructure, which collected data on demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, travel, car fuel purchasing and physical activity, and potential psychosocial and environmental correlates and mediators of those behaviours. In the absence of suitable no-intervention control groups, the study design drew on heterogeneity in exposure both within and between case study samples to provide for a counterfactual. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study was approved by the University of Southampton Research Ethics Committee. The findings will be disseminated through academic presentations, peer-reviewed publications and the study website (http://www.iconnect.ac.uk) and by means of a national seminar at the end of the study. BMJ Group 2012-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3274720/ /pubmed/22307104 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000694 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Public Health
Ogilvie, David
Bull, Fiona
Cooper, Ashley
Rutter, Harry
Adams, Emma
Brand, Christian
Ghali, Karen
Jones, Tim
Mutrie, Nanette
Powell, Jane
Preston, John
Sahlqvist, Shannon
Song, Yena
Evaluating the travel, physical activity and carbon impacts of a ‘natural experiment’ in the provision of new walking and cycling infrastructure: methods for the core module of the iConnect study
title Evaluating the travel, physical activity and carbon impacts of a ‘natural experiment’ in the provision of new walking and cycling infrastructure: methods for the core module of the iConnect study
title_full Evaluating the travel, physical activity and carbon impacts of a ‘natural experiment’ in the provision of new walking and cycling infrastructure: methods for the core module of the iConnect study
title_fullStr Evaluating the travel, physical activity and carbon impacts of a ‘natural experiment’ in the provision of new walking and cycling infrastructure: methods for the core module of the iConnect study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the travel, physical activity and carbon impacts of a ‘natural experiment’ in the provision of new walking and cycling infrastructure: methods for the core module of the iConnect study
title_short Evaluating the travel, physical activity and carbon impacts of a ‘natural experiment’ in the provision of new walking and cycling infrastructure: methods for the core module of the iConnect study
title_sort evaluating the travel, physical activity and carbon impacts of a ‘natural experiment’ in the provision of new walking and cycling infrastructure: methods for the core module of the iconnect study
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3274720/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22307104
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000694
work_keys_str_mv AT ogilviedavid evaluatingthetravelphysicalactivityandcarbonimpactsofanaturalexperimentintheprovisionofnewwalkingandcyclinginfrastructuremethodsforthecoremoduleoftheiconnectstudy
AT bullfiona evaluatingthetravelphysicalactivityandcarbonimpactsofanaturalexperimentintheprovisionofnewwalkingandcyclinginfrastructuremethodsforthecoremoduleoftheiconnectstudy
AT cooperashley evaluatingthetravelphysicalactivityandcarbonimpactsofanaturalexperimentintheprovisionofnewwalkingandcyclinginfrastructuremethodsforthecoremoduleoftheiconnectstudy
AT rutterharry evaluatingthetravelphysicalactivityandcarbonimpactsofanaturalexperimentintheprovisionofnewwalkingandcyclinginfrastructuremethodsforthecoremoduleoftheiconnectstudy
AT adamsemma evaluatingthetravelphysicalactivityandcarbonimpactsofanaturalexperimentintheprovisionofnewwalkingandcyclinginfrastructuremethodsforthecoremoduleoftheiconnectstudy
AT brandchristian evaluatingthetravelphysicalactivityandcarbonimpactsofanaturalexperimentintheprovisionofnewwalkingandcyclinginfrastructuremethodsforthecoremoduleoftheiconnectstudy
AT ghalikaren evaluatingthetravelphysicalactivityandcarbonimpactsofanaturalexperimentintheprovisionofnewwalkingandcyclinginfrastructuremethodsforthecoremoduleoftheiconnectstudy
AT jonestim evaluatingthetravelphysicalactivityandcarbonimpactsofanaturalexperimentintheprovisionofnewwalkingandcyclinginfrastructuremethodsforthecoremoduleoftheiconnectstudy
AT mutrienanette evaluatingthetravelphysicalactivityandcarbonimpactsofanaturalexperimentintheprovisionofnewwalkingandcyclinginfrastructuremethodsforthecoremoduleoftheiconnectstudy
AT powelljane evaluatingthetravelphysicalactivityandcarbonimpactsofanaturalexperimentintheprovisionofnewwalkingandcyclinginfrastructuremethodsforthecoremoduleoftheiconnectstudy
AT prestonjohn evaluatingthetravelphysicalactivityandcarbonimpactsofanaturalexperimentintheprovisionofnewwalkingandcyclinginfrastructuremethodsforthecoremoduleoftheiconnectstudy
AT sahlqvistshannon evaluatingthetravelphysicalactivityandcarbonimpactsofanaturalexperimentintheprovisionofnewwalkingandcyclinginfrastructuremethodsforthecoremoduleoftheiconnectstudy
AT songyena evaluatingthetravelphysicalactivityandcarbonimpactsofanaturalexperimentintheprovisionofnewwalkingandcyclinginfrastructuremethodsforthecoremoduleoftheiconnectstudy