Cargando…

Comparison of two peptide radiotracers for prostate carcinoma targeting

OBJECTIVES: Scintigraphy is generally not the first choice treatment for prostate cancer, although successful studies using bombesin analog radiopeptides have been performed. Recently, a novel peptide obtained using a phage display library demonstrated an affinity for prostate tumor cells. The aim o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Faintuch, Bluma Linkowski, Oliveira, Erica A, Nunez, Eutimio G F, Moro, Ana M, Nanda, P K, Smith, Charles J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3275116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22358242
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(02)12
_version_ 1782223173602770944
author Faintuch, Bluma Linkowski
Oliveira, Erica A
Nunez, Eutimio G F
Moro, Ana M
Nanda, P K
Smith, Charles J
author_facet Faintuch, Bluma Linkowski
Oliveira, Erica A
Nunez, Eutimio G F
Moro, Ana M
Nanda, P K
Smith, Charles J
author_sort Faintuch, Bluma Linkowski
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Scintigraphy is generally not the first choice treatment for prostate cancer, although successful studies using bombesin analog radiopeptides have been performed. Recently, a novel peptide obtained using a phage display library demonstrated an affinity for prostate tumor cells. The aim of this study was to compare the use of a bombesin analog to that of a phage display library peptide (DUP-1) radiolabeled with technetium-99m for the treatment of prostate carcinoma. The peptides were first conjugated to S-acetyl-MAG3 with a 6-carbon spacer, namely aminohexanoic acid. METHODS: The technetium-99m labeling required a sodium tartrate buffer. Radiochemical evaluation was performed using ITLC and was confirmed by high-performance liquid chromatography. The coefficient partition was determined, and in vitro studies were performed using human prostate tumor cells. Biodistribution was evaluated in healthy animals at various time points and also in mice bearing tumors. RESULTS: The radiochemical purity of both radiotracers was greater than 95%. The DUP-1 tracer was more hydrophilic (log P = -2.41) than the bombesin tracer (log P = -0.39). The biodistribution evaluation confirmed this hydrophilicity by revealing the greater kidney uptake of DUP-1. The bombesin concentration in the pancreas was greater than that of DUP-1 due to specific gastrin-releasing peptide receptors. Bombesin internalization occurred for 78.32% of the total binding in tumor cells. The DUP-1 tracer showed very low binding to tumor cells during the in vitro evaluation, although tumor uptake for both tracers was similar. The tumors were primarily blocked by DUP-1 and the bombesin radiotracer primarily targeted the pancreas. CONCLUSION: Further studies with the radiolabeled DUP-1 peptide are recommended. With further structural changes, this molecule could become an efficient alternative tracer for prostate tumor diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3275116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32751162012-02-09 Comparison of two peptide radiotracers for prostate carcinoma targeting Faintuch, Bluma Linkowski Oliveira, Erica A Nunez, Eutimio G F Moro, Ana M Nanda, P K Smith, Charles J Clinics (Sao Paulo) Basic Research OBJECTIVES: Scintigraphy is generally not the first choice treatment for prostate cancer, although successful studies using bombesin analog radiopeptides have been performed. Recently, a novel peptide obtained using a phage display library demonstrated an affinity for prostate tumor cells. The aim of this study was to compare the use of a bombesin analog to that of a phage display library peptide (DUP-1) radiolabeled with technetium-99m for the treatment of prostate carcinoma. The peptides were first conjugated to S-acetyl-MAG3 with a 6-carbon spacer, namely aminohexanoic acid. METHODS: The technetium-99m labeling required a sodium tartrate buffer. Radiochemical evaluation was performed using ITLC and was confirmed by high-performance liquid chromatography. The coefficient partition was determined, and in vitro studies were performed using human prostate tumor cells. Biodistribution was evaluated in healthy animals at various time points and also in mice bearing tumors. RESULTS: The radiochemical purity of both radiotracers was greater than 95%. The DUP-1 tracer was more hydrophilic (log P = -2.41) than the bombesin tracer (log P = -0.39). The biodistribution evaluation confirmed this hydrophilicity by revealing the greater kidney uptake of DUP-1. The bombesin concentration in the pancreas was greater than that of DUP-1 due to specific gastrin-releasing peptide receptors. Bombesin internalization occurred for 78.32% of the total binding in tumor cells. The DUP-1 tracer showed very low binding to tumor cells during the in vitro evaluation, although tumor uptake for both tracers was similar. The tumors were primarily blocked by DUP-1 and the bombesin radiotracer primarily targeted the pancreas. CONCLUSION: Further studies with the radiolabeled DUP-1 peptide are recommended. With further structural changes, this molecule could become an efficient alternative tracer for prostate tumor diagnosis. Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo 2012-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3275116/ /pubmed/22358242 http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(02)12 Text en Copyright © 2012 Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Basic Research
Faintuch, Bluma Linkowski
Oliveira, Erica A
Nunez, Eutimio G F
Moro, Ana M
Nanda, P K
Smith, Charles J
Comparison of two peptide radiotracers for prostate carcinoma targeting
title Comparison of two peptide radiotracers for prostate carcinoma targeting
title_full Comparison of two peptide radiotracers for prostate carcinoma targeting
title_fullStr Comparison of two peptide radiotracers for prostate carcinoma targeting
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of two peptide radiotracers for prostate carcinoma targeting
title_short Comparison of two peptide radiotracers for prostate carcinoma targeting
title_sort comparison of two peptide radiotracers for prostate carcinoma targeting
topic Basic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3275116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22358242
http://dx.doi.org/10.6061/clinics/2012(02)12
work_keys_str_mv AT faintuchblumalinkowski comparisonoftwopeptideradiotracersforprostatecarcinomatargeting
AT oliveiraericaa comparisonoftwopeptideradiotracersforprostatecarcinomatargeting
AT nunezeutimiogf comparisonoftwopeptideradiotracersforprostatecarcinomatargeting
AT moroanam comparisonoftwopeptideradiotracersforprostatecarcinomatargeting
AT nandapk comparisonoftwopeptideradiotracersforprostatecarcinomatargeting
AT smithcharlesj comparisonoftwopeptideradiotracersforprostatecarcinomatargeting