Cargando…

Generating social network data using partially described networks: an example informing avian influenza control in the British poultry industry

BACKGROUND: Targeted sampling can capture the characteristics of more vulnerable sectors of a population, but may bias the picture of population level disease risk. When sampling network data, an incomplete description of the population may arise leading to biased estimates of between-host connectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nickbakhsh, Sema, Matthews, Louise, Bessell, Paul R, Reid, Stuart WJ, Kao, Rowland R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3275467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22027039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-7-66
_version_ 1782223215201878016
author Nickbakhsh, Sema
Matthews, Louise
Bessell, Paul R
Reid, Stuart WJ
Kao, Rowland R
author_facet Nickbakhsh, Sema
Matthews, Louise
Bessell, Paul R
Reid, Stuart WJ
Kao, Rowland R
author_sort Nickbakhsh, Sema
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Targeted sampling can capture the characteristics of more vulnerable sectors of a population, but may bias the picture of population level disease risk. When sampling network data, an incomplete description of the population may arise leading to biased estimates of between-host connectivity. Avian influenza (AI) control planning in Great Britain (GB) provides one example where network data for the poultry industry (the Poultry Network Database or PND), targeted large premises and is consequently demographically biased. Exposing the effect of such biases on the geographical distribution of network properties could help target future poultry network data collection exercises. These data will be important for informing the control of potential future disease outbreaks. RESULTS: The PND was used to compute between-farm association frequencies, assuming that farms sharing the same slaughterhouse or catching company, or through integration, are potentially epidemiologically linked. The fitted statistical models were extrapolated to the Great Britain Poultry Register (GBPR); this dataset is more representative of the poultry industry but lacks network information. This comparison showed how systematic biases in the demographic characterisation of a network, resulting from targeted sampling procedures, can bias the derived picture of between-host connectivity within the network. CONCLUSIONS: With particular reference to the predictive modeling of AI in GB, we find significantly different connectivity patterns across GB when network estimates incorporate the more demographically representative information provided by the GBPR; this has not been accounted for by previous epidemiological analyses. We recommend ranking geographical regions, based on relative confidence in extrapolated estimates, for prioritising further data collection. Evaluating whether and how the between-farm association frequencies impact on the risk of between-farm transmission will be the focus of future work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3275467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32754672012-02-13 Generating social network data using partially described networks: an example informing avian influenza control in the British poultry industry Nickbakhsh, Sema Matthews, Louise Bessell, Paul R Reid, Stuart WJ Kao, Rowland R BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Targeted sampling can capture the characteristics of more vulnerable sectors of a population, but may bias the picture of population level disease risk. When sampling network data, an incomplete description of the population may arise leading to biased estimates of between-host connectivity. Avian influenza (AI) control planning in Great Britain (GB) provides one example where network data for the poultry industry (the Poultry Network Database or PND), targeted large premises and is consequently demographically biased. Exposing the effect of such biases on the geographical distribution of network properties could help target future poultry network data collection exercises. These data will be important for informing the control of potential future disease outbreaks. RESULTS: The PND was used to compute between-farm association frequencies, assuming that farms sharing the same slaughterhouse or catching company, or through integration, are potentially epidemiologically linked. The fitted statistical models were extrapolated to the Great Britain Poultry Register (GBPR); this dataset is more representative of the poultry industry but lacks network information. This comparison showed how systematic biases in the demographic characterisation of a network, resulting from targeted sampling procedures, can bias the derived picture of between-host connectivity within the network. CONCLUSIONS: With particular reference to the predictive modeling of AI in GB, we find significantly different connectivity patterns across GB when network estimates incorporate the more demographically representative information provided by the GBPR; this has not been accounted for by previous epidemiological analyses. We recommend ranking geographical regions, based on relative confidence in extrapolated estimates, for prioritising further data collection. Evaluating whether and how the between-farm association frequencies impact on the risk of between-farm transmission will be the focus of future work. BioMed Central 2011-10-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3275467/ /pubmed/22027039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-7-66 Text en Copyright ©2011 Nickbakhsh et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Nickbakhsh, Sema
Matthews, Louise
Bessell, Paul R
Reid, Stuart WJ
Kao, Rowland R
Generating social network data using partially described networks: an example informing avian influenza control in the British poultry industry
title Generating social network data using partially described networks: an example informing avian influenza control in the British poultry industry
title_full Generating social network data using partially described networks: an example informing avian influenza control in the British poultry industry
title_fullStr Generating social network data using partially described networks: an example informing avian influenza control in the British poultry industry
title_full_unstemmed Generating social network data using partially described networks: an example informing avian influenza control in the British poultry industry
title_short Generating social network data using partially described networks: an example informing avian influenza control in the British poultry industry
title_sort generating social network data using partially described networks: an example informing avian influenza control in the british poultry industry
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3275467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22027039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-7-66
work_keys_str_mv AT nickbakhshsema generatingsocialnetworkdatausingpartiallydescribednetworksanexampleinformingavianinfluenzacontrolinthebritishpoultryindustry
AT matthewslouise generatingsocialnetworkdatausingpartiallydescribednetworksanexampleinformingavianinfluenzacontrolinthebritishpoultryindustry
AT bessellpaulr generatingsocialnetworkdatausingpartiallydescribednetworksanexampleinformingavianinfluenzacontrolinthebritishpoultryindustry
AT reidstuartwj generatingsocialnetworkdatausingpartiallydescribednetworksanexampleinformingavianinfluenzacontrolinthebritishpoultryindustry
AT kaorowlandr generatingsocialnetworkdatausingpartiallydescribednetworksanexampleinformingavianinfluenzacontrolinthebritishpoultryindustry