Cargando…

Are all prognostic factors in parotid gland carcinoma well recognized?

The aim of his study was to assess the treatment results and prognostic factors in patients with parotid gland carcinoma. The material consisted of 109 patients treated surgically, with or without complementary radiotherapy, between 1978 and 2008 (follow-up at least 5-years). 5-year overall and dise...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stodulski, Dominik, Mikaszewski, Boguslaw, Stankiewicz, Czeslaw
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3275734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21822857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1716-6
_version_ 1782223263614631936
author Stodulski, Dominik
Mikaszewski, Boguslaw
Stankiewicz, Czeslaw
author_facet Stodulski, Dominik
Mikaszewski, Boguslaw
Stankiewicz, Czeslaw
author_sort Stodulski, Dominik
collection PubMed
description The aim of his study was to assess the treatment results and prognostic factors in patients with parotid gland carcinoma. The material consisted of 109 patients treated surgically, with or without complementary radiotherapy, between 1978 and 2008 (follow-up at least 5-years). 5-year overall and disease-specific survival were observed in 57.0% of the patients and 5-year disease-free survival was achieved in 50.0%. Univariate analysis including ten clinical and pathological features to assess their prognostic value was done. Parapharyngeal space invasion, facial nerve palsy, and high grade of tumor malignancy were the factors with the highest influence on the treatment results, because their presence decreased the chance for recovery 9.8, 9.7, and 8.2 times, respectively. Histologically positive cervical lymph nodes and extraparenchymal extension were the other factors connected with poor prognosis (prognosis worse 6.7 and 5.4 times, respectively). Clinically positive cervical lymph nodes, positive/uncertain microscopic margin, involvement of the deep lobe, or the whole gland increased the risk of treatment failure 3.4, 3.1, and 2.8, respectively. The age ≥60 years and male gender were statistically significant factors, correlated with poor prognosis and decreased chance for recovery 2.4 and 2.6 times. T-status and clinical stage had important influence on 5-year disease-free survival rate because there were significant differences in the treatment results between individual stages. Multivariate analysis proved that the independent prognostic value, among anatomic structures involved by the neoplasm, had mandible, facial nerve, and skin infiltration. Among tumor-related factors, T-stage and grade had the statistically significant influence on treatment results, and stage and lymph nodes metastases among clinical and pathological features. These results confirm the value of actually used TNM classification (2002). Although the parapharyngeal space invasion is a factor, which seems to have a significant, poor prognostic value, it was not included in this classification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3275734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32757342012-02-21 Are all prognostic factors in parotid gland carcinoma well recognized? Stodulski, Dominik Mikaszewski, Boguslaw Stankiewicz, Czeslaw Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Head and Neck The aim of his study was to assess the treatment results and prognostic factors in patients with parotid gland carcinoma. The material consisted of 109 patients treated surgically, with or without complementary radiotherapy, between 1978 and 2008 (follow-up at least 5-years). 5-year overall and disease-specific survival were observed in 57.0% of the patients and 5-year disease-free survival was achieved in 50.0%. Univariate analysis including ten clinical and pathological features to assess their prognostic value was done. Parapharyngeal space invasion, facial nerve palsy, and high grade of tumor malignancy were the factors with the highest influence on the treatment results, because their presence decreased the chance for recovery 9.8, 9.7, and 8.2 times, respectively. Histologically positive cervical lymph nodes and extraparenchymal extension were the other factors connected with poor prognosis (prognosis worse 6.7 and 5.4 times, respectively). Clinically positive cervical lymph nodes, positive/uncertain microscopic margin, involvement of the deep lobe, or the whole gland increased the risk of treatment failure 3.4, 3.1, and 2.8, respectively. The age ≥60 years and male gender were statistically significant factors, correlated with poor prognosis and decreased chance for recovery 2.4 and 2.6 times. T-status and clinical stage had important influence on 5-year disease-free survival rate because there were significant differences in the treatment results between individual stages. Multivariate analysis proved that the independent prognostic value, among anatomic structures involved by the neoplasm, had mandible, facial nerve, and skin infiltration. Among tumor-related factors, T-stage and grade had the statistically significant influence on treatment results, and stage and lymph nodes metastases among clinical and pathological features. These results confirm the value of actually used TNM classification (2002). Although the parapharyngeal space invasion is a factor, which seems to have a significant, poor prognostic value, it was not included in this classification. Springer-Verlag 2011-08-06 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3275734/ /pubmed/21822857 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1716-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Head and Neck
Stodulski, Dominik
Mikaszewski, Boguslaw
Stankiewicz, Czeslaw
Are all prognostic factors in parotid gland carcinoma well recognized?
title Are all prognostic factors in parotid gland carcinoma well recognized?
title_full Are all prognostic factors in parotid gland carcinoma well recognized?
title_fullStr Are all prognostic factors in parotid gland carcinoma well recognized?
title_full_unstemmed Are all prognostic factors in parotid gland carcinoma well recognized?
title_short Are all prognostic factors in parotid gland carcinoma well recognized?
title_sort are all prognostic factors in parotid gland carcinoma well recognized?
topic Head and Neck
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3275734/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21822857
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1716-6
work_keys_str_mv AT stodulskidominik areallprognosticfactorsinparotidglandcarcinomawellrecognized
AT mikaszewskiboguslaw areallprognosticfactorsinparotidglandcarcinomawellrecognized
AT stankiewiczczeslaw areallprognosticfactorsinparotidglandcarcinomawellrecognized