Cargando…
Quantitative Genetics of Genomic Imprinting: A Comparison of Simple Variance Derivations, the Effects of Inbreeding, and Response to Selection
The level of expression of an imprinted gene is dependent on the sex of the parent from which it was inherited. As a result, reciprocal heterozygotes in a population may have different mean phenotypes for quantitative traits. Using standard quantitative genetic methods for deriving breeding values,...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Genetics Society of America
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3276129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22384325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.111.000042 |
_version_ | 1782223333145706496 |
---|---|
author | Santure, Anna W. Spencer, Hamish G. |
author_facet | Santure, Anna W. Spencer, Hamish G. |
author_sort | Santure, Anna W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The level of expression of an imprinted gene is dependent on the sex of the parent from which it was inherited. As a result, reciprocal heterozygotes in a population may have different mean phenotypes for quantitative traits. Using standard quantitative genetic methods for deriving breeding values, population variances, and covariances between relatives, we demonstrate that although these approaches are equivalent under Mendelian expression, this equivalence is lost when genomic imprinting is acting. Imprinting introduces both parent-of-origin-dependent and generation-dependent effects that result in differences in the way additive and dominance effects are defined for the various approaches. Further, imprinting creates a covariance between additive and dominance terms absent under Mendelian expression, but the expression for this covariance cannot be derived using a number of the standard approaches for defining additive and dominance terms. Inbreeding also generates such a covariance, and we demonstrate that a modified method for partitioning variances can easily accommodate both inbreeding and imprinting. As with inbreeding, the concept of breeding values has no useful meaning for an imprinted trait. Finally, we derive the expression for the response to selection under imprinting, and conclude that the response to selection for an imprinted trait cannot be predicted from the breeder’s equation, even when there is no dominance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3276129 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Genetics Society of America |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32761292012-03-01 Quantitative Genetics of Genomic Imprinting: A Comparison of Simple Variance Derivations, the Effects of Inbreeding, and Response to Selection Santure, Anna W. Spencer, Hamish G. G3 (Bethesda) Investigation The level of expression of an imprinted gene is dependent on the sex of the parent from which it was inherited. As a result, reciprocal heterozygotes in a population may have different mean phenotypes for quantitative traits. Using standard quantitative genetic methods for deriving breeding values, population variances, and covariances between relatives, we demonstrate that although these approaches are equivalent under Mendelian expression, this equivalence is lost when genomic imprinting is acting. Imprinting introduces both parent-of-origin-dependent and generation-dependent effects that result in differences in the way additive and dominance effects are defined for the various approaches. Further, imprinting creates a covariance between additive and dominance terms absent under Mendelian expression, but the expression for this covariance cannot be derived using a number of the standard approaches for defining additive and dominance terms. Inbreeding also generates such a covariance, and we demonstrate that a modified method for partitioning variances can easily accommodate both inbreeding and imprinting. As with inbreeding, the concept of breeding values has no useful meaning for an imprinted trait. Finally, we derive the expression for the response to selection under imprinting, and conclude that the response to selection for an imprinted trait cannot be predicted from the breeder’s equation, even when there is no dominance. Genetics Society of America 2011-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3276129/ /pubmed/22384325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.111.000042 Text en Copyright © 2011 Santure, Spencer http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Unported License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Investigation Santure, Anna W. Spencer, Hamish G. Quantitative Genetics of Genomic Imprinting: A Comparison of Simple Variance Derivations, the Effects of Inbreeding, and Response to Selection |
title | Quantitative Genetics of Genomic Imprinting: A Comparison of Simple Variance Derivations, the Effects of Inbreeding, and Response to Selection |
title_full | Quantitative Genetics of Genomic Imprinting: A Comparison of Simple Variance Derivations, the Effects of Inbreeding, and Response to Selection |
title_fullStr | Quantitative Genetics of Genomic Imprinting: A Comparison of Simple Variance Derivations, the Effects of Inbreeding, and Response to Selection |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantitative Genetics of Genomic Imprinting: A Comparison of Simple Variance Derivations, the Effects of Inbreeding, and Response to Selection |
title_short | Quantitative Genetics of Genomic Imprinting: A Comparison of Simple Variance Derivations, the Effects of Inbreeding, and Response to Selection |
title_sort | quantitative genetics of genomic imprinting: a comparison of simple variance derivations, the effects of inbreeding, and response to selection |
topic | Investigation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3276129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22384325 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.111.000042 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT santureannaw quantitativegeneticsofgenomicimprintingacomparisonofsimplevariancederivationstheeffectsofinbreedingandresponsetoselection AT spencerhamishg quantitativegeneticsofgenomicimprintingacomparisonofsimplevariancederivationstheeffectsofinbreedingandresponsetoselection |