Cargando…

Contribution of the Vertebral Posterior Elements in Anterior–Posterior DXA Spine Scans in Young Subjects

Because DXA is a projection technique, anterior–posterior (AP) measurements of the spine include the posterior elements and the vertebral body. This may be a disadvantage because the posterior elements likely contribute little to vertebral fracture resistance. This study used QCT to quantify the imp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, David C, Campbell, Patricia P, Gilsanz, Vicente, Wren, Tishya AL
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons and The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3276347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19257831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.090224
_version_ 1782223357178019840
author Lee, David C
Campbell, Patricia P
Gilsanz, Vicente
Wren, Tishya AL
author_facet Lee, David C
Campbell, Patricia P
Gilsanz, Vicente
Wren, Tishya AL
author_sort Lee, David C
collection PubMed
description Because DXA is a projection technique, anterior–posterior (AP) measurements of the spine include the posterior elements and the vertebral body. This may be a disadvantage because the posterior elements likely contribute little to vertebral fracture resistance. This study used QCT to quantify the impact of the posterior elements in DXA AP spine measures. We examined 574 subjects (294 females and 280 males), age 6–25 yr, with DXA and QCT. QCT measures were calculated for the cancellous bone region and for the vertebral body including and excluding the posterior elements. DXA data were analyzed for the entire L(3) vertebra and for a 10-mm slice corresponding to the QCT scan region. BMC and BMD were determined and compared using Pearson's correlation. The posterior elements accounted for 51.4 ± 4.2% of the total BMC, with a significant difference between males (49.9 ± 4.0%) and females (52.8 ± 3.9%, p < 0.001). This percentage increased with age in younger subjects of both sexes (p < 0.001) but was relatively consistent after age 17 for males and 16 for females (p > 0.10). DXA areal BMD and QCT volumetric BMD correlated strongly for the whole vertebra including the posterior elements (R = 0.83), with BMC measures showing a stronger relationship (R = 0.93). Relationships were weaker when excluding the posterior elements. We conclude that DXA BMC provides a measure of bone that is most consistent with QCT and that the contribution of the posterior elements is consistent in young subjects after sexual maturity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3276347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher John Wiley and Sons and The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32763472012-02-13 Contribution of the Vertebral Posterior Elements in Anterior–Posterior DXA Spine Scans in Young Subjects Lee, David C Campbell, Patricia P Gilsanz, Vicente Wren, Tishya AL J Bone Miner Res Research-Article Because DXA is a projection technique, anterior–posterior (AP) measurements of the spine include the posterior elements and the vertebral body. This may be a disadvantage because the posterior elements likely contribute little to vertebral fracture resistance. This study used QCT to quantify the impact of the posterior elements in DXA AP spine measures. We examined 574 subjects (294 females and 280 males), age 6–25 yr, with DXA and QCT. QCT measures were calculated for the cancellous bone region and for the vertebral body including and excluding the posterior elements. DXA data were analyzed for the entire L(3) vertebra and for a 10-mm slice corresponding to the QCT scan region. BMC and BMD were determined and compared using Pearson's correlation. The posterior elements accounted for 51.4 ± 4.2% of the total BMC, with a significant difference between males (49.9 ± 4.0%) and females (52.8 ± 3.9%, p < 0.001). This percentage increased with age in younger subjects of both sexes (p < 0.001) but was relatively consistent after age 17 for males and 16 for females (p > 0.10). DXA areal BMD and QCT volumetric BMD correlated strongly for the whole vertebra including the posterior elements (R = 0.83), with BMC measures showing a stronger relationship (R = 0.93). Relationships were weaker when excluding the posterior elements. We conclude that DXA BMC provides a measure of bone that is most consistent with QCT and that the contribution of the posterior elements is consistent in young subjects after sexual maturity. John Wiley and Sons and The American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR) 2009-08 2009-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3276347/ /pubmed/19257831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.090224 Text en Copyright © 2009 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ Re-use of this article is permitted in accordance with the Creative Commons Deed, Attribution 2.5, which does not permit commercial exploitation.
spellingShingle Research-Article
Lee, David C
Campbell, Patricia P
Gilsanz, Vicente
Wren, Tishya AL
Contribution of the Vertebral Posterior Elements in Anterior–Posterior DXA Spine Scans in Young Subjects
title Contribution of the Vertebral Posterior Elements in Anterior–Posterior DXA Spine Scans in Young Subjects
title_full Contribution of the Vertebral Posterior Elements in Anterior–Posterior DXA Spine Scans in Young Subjects
title_fullStr Contribution of the Vertebral Posterior Elements in Anterior–Posterior DXA Spine Scans in Young Subjects
title_full_unstemmed Contribution of the Vertebral Posterior Elements in Anterior–Posterior DXA Spine Scans in Young Subjects
title_short Contribution of the Vertebral Posterior Elements in Anterior–Posterior DXA Spine Scans in Young Subjects
title_sort contribution of the vertebral posterior elements in anterior–posterior dxa spine scans in young subjects
topic Research-Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3276347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19257831
http://dx.doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.090224
work_keys_str_mv AT leedavidc contributionofthevertebralposteriorelementsinanteriorposteriordxaspinescansinyoungsubjects
AT campbellpatriciap contributionofthevertebralposteriorelementsinanteriorposteriordxaspinescansinyoungsubjects
AT gilsanzvicente contributionofthevertebralposteriorelementsinanteriorposteriordxaspinescansinyoungsubjects
AT wrentishyaal contributionofthevertebralposteriorelementsinanteriorposteriordxaspinescansinyoungsubjects