Cargando…

Outcomes associated with matching patients' treatment preferences to physicians' recommendations: study methodology

BACKGROUND: Patients often express strong preferences for the forms of treatment available for their disease. Incorporating these preferences into the process of treatment decision-making might improve patients' adherence to treatment, contributing to better outcomes. We describe the methodolog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Umar, Nasir, Litaker, David, Schaarschmidt, Marthe-Lisa, Peitsch, Wiebke K, Schmieder, Astrid, Terris, Darcey D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3276415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22214259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-1
_version_ 1782223363279683584
author Umar, Nasir
Litaker, David
Schaarschmidt, Marthe-Lisa
Peitsch, Wiebke K
Schmieder, Astrid
Terris, Darcey D
author_facet Umar, Nasir
Litaker, David
Schaarschmidt, Marthe-Lisa
Peitsch, Wiebke K
Schmieder, Astrid
Terris, Darcey D
author_sort Umar, Nasir
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients often express strong preferences for the forms of treatment available for their disease. Incorporating these preferences into the process of treatment decision-making might improve patients' adherence to treatment, contributing to better outcomes. We describe the methodology used in a study aiming to assess treatment outcomes when patients' preferences for treatment are closely matched to recommended treatments. METHOD: Participants included patients with moderate and severe psoriasis attending outpatient dermatology clinics at the University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany. A self-administered online survey used conjoint analysis to measure participants' preferences for psoriasis treatment options at the initial study visit. Physicians' treatment recommendations were abstracted from each participant's medical records. The Preference Matching Index (PMI), a measure of concordance between the participant's preferences for treatment and the physician's recommended treatment, was determined for each participant at t(1 )(initial study visit). A clinical outcome measure, the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, and two participant-derived outcomes assessing treatment satisfaction and health related quality of life were employed at t(1), t(2 )(twelve weeks post-t(1)) and t(3 )(twelve weeks post-t(2)). Change in outcomes was assessed using repeated measures analysis of variance. The association between participants' PMI scores at t(1 )and outcomes at t(2 )and t(3 )was evaluated using multivariate regressions analysis. DISCUSSION: We describe methods for capturing concordance between patients' treatment preferences and recommended treatment and for assessing its association with specific treatment outcomes. The methods are intended to promote the incorporation of patients' preferences in treatment decision-making, enhance treatment satisfaction, and improve treatment effectiveness through greater adherence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3276415
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32764152012-02-10 Outcomes associated with matching patients' treatment preferences to physicians' recommendations: study methodology Umar, Nasir Litaker, David Schaarschmidt, Marthe-Lisa Peitsch, Wiebke K Schmieder, Astrid Terris, Darcey D BMC Health Serv Res Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Patients often express strong preferences for the forms of treatment available for their disease. Incorporating these preferences into the process of treatment decision-making might improve patients' adherence to treatment, contributing to better outcomes. We describe the methodology used in a study aiming to assess treatment outcomes when patients' preferences for treatment are closely matched to recommended treatments. METHOD: Participants included patients with moderate and severe psoriasis attending outpatient dermatology clinics at the University Medical Centre Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Germany. A self-administered online survey used conjoint analysis to measure participants' preferences for psoriasis treatment options at the initial study visit. Physicians' treatment recommendations were abstracted from each participant's medical records. The Preference Matching Index (PMI), a measure of concordance between the participant's preferences for treatment and the physician's recommended treatment, was determined for each participant at t(1 )(initial study visit). A clinical outcome measure, the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index, and two participant-derived outcomes assessing treatment satisfaction and health related quality of life were employed at t(1), t(2 )(twelve weeks post-t(1)) and t(3 )(twelve weeks post-t(2)). Change in outcomes was assessed using repeated measures analysis of variance. The association between participants' PMI scores at t(1 )and outcomes at t(2 )and t(3 )was evaluated using multivariate regressions analysis. DISCUSSION: We describe methods for capturing concordance between patients' treatment preferences and recommended treatment and for assessing its association with specific treatment outcomes. The methods are intended to promote the incorporation of patients' preferences in treatment decision-making, enhance treatment satisfaction, and improve treatment effectiveness through greater adherence. BioMed Central 2012-01-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3276415/ /pubmed/22214259 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-1 Text en Copyright ©2012 Umar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Umar, Nasir
Litaker, David
Schaarschmidt, Marthe-Lisa
Peitsch, Wiebke K
Schmieder, Astrid
Terris, Darcey D
Outcomes associated with matching patients' treatment preferences to physicians' recommendations: study methodology
title Outcomes associated with matching patients' treatment preferences to physicians' recommendations: study methodology
title_full Outcomes associated with matching patients' treatment preferences to physicians' recommendations: study methodology
title_fullStr Outcomes associated with matching patients' treatment preferences to physicians' recommendations: study methodology
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes associated with matching patients' treatment preferences to physicians' recommendations: study methodology
title_short Outcomes associated with matching patients' treatment preferences to physicians' recommendations: study methodology
title_sort outcomes associated with matching patients' treatment preferences to physicians' recommendations: study methodology
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3276415/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22214259
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-1
work_keys_str_mv AT umarnasir outcomesassociatedwithmatchingpatientstreatmentpreferencestophysiciansrecommendationsstudymethodology
AT litakerdavid outcomesassociatedwithmatchingpatientstreatmentpreferencestophysiciansrecommendationsstudymethodology
AT schaarschmidtmarthelisa outcomesassociatedwithmatchingpatientstreatmentpreferencestophysiciansrecommendationsstudymethodology
AT peitschwiebkek outcomesassociatedwithmatchingpatientstreatmentpreferencestophysiciansrecommendationsstudymethodology
AT schmiederastrid outcomesassociatedwithmatchingpatientstreatmentpreferencestophysiciansrecommendationsstudymethodology
AT terrisdarceyd outcomesassociatedwithmatchingpatientstreatmentpreferencestophysiciansrecommendationsstudymethodology