Cargando…

The effectiveness of health appraisal processes currently in addressing health and wellbeing during spatial plan appraisal: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: Spatial planning affects the built environment, which in turn has the potential to have a significant impact on health, for good or ill. One way of ensuring that spatial plans take due account of health is through the inclusion of health considerations in the statutory and non statutory...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gray, Selena, Carmichael, Laurence, Barton, Hugh, Mytton, Julie, Lease, Helen, Joynt, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3276579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22115419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-889
_version_ 1782223389860036608
author Gray, Selena
Carmichael, Laurence
Barton, Hugh
Mytton, Julie
Lease, Helen
Joynt, Jennifer
author_facet Gray, Selena
Carmichael, Laurence
Barton, Hugh
Mytton, Julie
Lease, Helen
Joynt, Jennifer
author_sort Gray, Selena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spatial planning affects the built environment, which in turn has the potential to have a significant impact on health, for good or ill. One way of ensuring that spatial plans take due account of health is through the inclusion of health considerations in the statutory and non statutory appraisal processes linked to plan-making processes. METHODS: A systematic review to identify evaluation studies of appraisals or assessments of plans where health issues were considered from 1987 to 2010. RESULTS: A total of 6161 citations were identified: 6069 from electronic databases, 57 fromwebsite searches, with a further 35 citations from grey literature, of which 20 met the inclusion criteria. These 20 citations reported on a total of 135 different case studies: 11 UK HIA; 11 non UK high income countries HIA, 5 UK SEA or other integrated appraisal; 108 non UK high income SEA or other integrated appraisal. All studies were in English. No relevant studies were identified reporting on low or middle income countries. The studies were limited by potential bias (no independent evaluation, with those undertaking the appraisal also responsible for reporting outcomes), lack of detail and a lack of triangulation of results. Health impact assessments generally covered the four specified health domains (physical activity, mental health and wellbeing, environmental health issues such as pollution and noise, injury) more comprehensively than SEA or other integrated appraisals, although mental health and wellbeing was an underdeveloped area. There was no evidence available on the incorporation of health in Sustainability Appraisal, limited evidence that the recommendations from any type of appraisal were implemented, and almost no evidence that the recommendations had led to the anticipated outcomes or improvements in health postulated. CONCLUSION: Research is needed to assess (i) the degree to which statutory plan appraisal processes (SA in the UK) incorporate health; (ii) whether recommendations arising from health appraisal translate into the development process and (iii) whether outcomes are as anticipated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3276579
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32765792012-02-10 The effectiveness of health appraisal processes currently in addressing health and wellbeing during spatial plan appraisal: a systematic review Gray, Selena Carmichael, Laurence Barton, Hugh Mytton, Julie Lease, Helen Joynt, Jennifer BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Spatial planning affects the built environment, which in turn has the potential to have a significant impact on health, for good or ill. One way of ensuring that spatial plans take due account of health is through the inclusion of health considerations in the statutory and non statutory appraisal processes linked to plan-making processes. METHODS: A systematic review to identify evaluation studies of appraisals or assessments of plans where health issues were considered from 1987 to 2010. RESULTS: A total of 6161 citations were identified: 6069 from electronic databases, 57 fromwebsite searches, with a further 35 citations from grey literature, of which 20 met the inclusion criteria. These 20 citations reported on a total of 135 different case studies: 11 UK HIA; 11 non UK high income countries HIA, 5 UK SEA or other integrated appraisal; 108 non UK high income SEA or other integrated appraisal. All studies were in English. No relevant studies were identified reporting on low or middle income countries. The studies were limited by potential bias (no independent evaluation, with those undertaking the appraisal also responsible for reporting outcomes), lack of detail and a lack of triangulation of results. Health impact assessments generally covered the four specified health domains (physical activity, mental health and wellbeing, environmental health issues such as pollution and noise, injury) more comprehensively than SEA or other integrated appraisals, although mental health and wellbeing was an underdeveloped area. There was no evidence available on the incorporation of health in Sustainability Appraisal, limited evidence that the recommendations from any type of appraisal were implemented, and almost no evidence that the recommendations had led to the anticipated outcomes or improvements in health postulated. CONCLUSION: Research is needed to assess (i) the degree to which statutory plan appraisal processes (SA in the UK) incorporate health; (ii) whether recommendations arising from health appraisal translate into the development process and (iii) whether outcomes are as anticipated. BioMed Central 2011-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3276579/ /pubmed/22115419 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-889 Text en Copyright ©2011 Gray; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
spellingShingle Research Article
Gray, Selena
Carmichael, Laurence
Barton, Hugh
Mytton, Julie
Lease, Helen
Joynt, Jennifer
The effectiveness of health appraisal processes currently in addressing health and wellbeing during spatial plan appraisal: a systematic review
title The effectiveness of health appraisal processes currently in addressing health and wellbeing during spatial plan appraisal: a systematic review
title_full The effectiveness of health appraisal processes currently in addressing health and wellbeing during spatial plan appraisal: a systematic review
title_fullStr The effectiveness of health appraisal processes currently in addressing health and wellbeing during spatial plan appraisal: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of health appraisal processes currently in addressing health and wellbeing during spatial plan appraisal: a systematic review
title_short The effectiveness of health appraisal processes currently in addressing health and wellbeing during spatial plan appraisal: a systematic review
title_sort effectiveness of health appraisal processes currently in addressing health and wellbeing during spatial plan appraisal: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3276579/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22115419
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-11-889
work_keys_str_mv AT grayselena theeffectivenessofhealthappraisalprocessescurrentlyinaddressinghealthandwellbeingduringspatialplanappraisalasystematicreview
AT carmichaellaurence theeffectivenessofhealthappraisalprocessescurrentlyinaddressinghealthandwellbeingduringspatialplanappraisalasystematicreview
AT bartonhugh theeffectivenessofhealthappraisalprocessescurrentlyinaddressinghealthandwellbeingduringspatialplanappraisalasystematicreview
AT myttonjulie theeffectivenessofhealthappraisalprocessescurrentlyinaddressinghealthandwellbeingduringspatialplanappraisalasystematicreview
AT leasehelen theeffectivenessofhealthappraisalprocessescurrentlyinaddressinghealthandwellbeingduringspatialplanappraisalasystematicreview
AT joyntjennifer theeffectivenessofhealthappraisalprocessescurrentlyinaddressinghealthandwellbeingduringspatialplanappraisalasystematicreview
AT grayselena effectivenessofhealthappraisalprocessescurrentlyinaddressinghealthandwellbeingduringspatialplanappraisalasystematicreview
AT carmichaellaurence effectivenessofhealthappraisalprocessescurrentlyinaddressinghealthandwellbeingduringspatialplanappraisalasystematicreview
AT bartonhugh effectivenessofhealthappraisalprocessescurrentlyinaddressinghealthandwellbeingduringspatialplanappraisalasystematicreview
AT myttonjulie effectivenessofhealthappraisalprocessescurrentlyinaddressinghealthandwellbeingduringspatialplanappraisalasystematicreview
AT leasehelen effectivenessofhealthappraisalprocessescurrentlyinaddressinghealthandwellbeingduringspatialplanappraisalasystematicreview
AT joyntjennifer effectivenessofhealthappraisalprocessescurrentlyinaddressinghealthandwellbeingduringspatialplanappraisalasystematicreview