Cargando…

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Bisphosphonates in the Management of Painful Bone Metastasis

INTRODUCTION: The prospective interventional single-institution randomized control study was carried out to compare the pain relieving efficacy among different bisphosphonates at the cost of incidence of skeletal-related events (SRE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: During June 2008 and May 2011, 256 patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choudhury, Krishnangshu Bhanju, Mallik, Chandrani, Sharma, Shyam, Choudhury, Debangshu Bhanju, Maiti, Sumana, Roy, Chhaya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3276818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22346045
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-1075.92338
_version_ 1782223412217774080
author Choudhury, Krishnangshu Bhanju
Mallik, Chandrani
Sharma, Shyam
Choudhury, Debangshu Bhanju
Maiti, Sumana
Roy, Chhaya
author_facet Choudhury, Krishnangshu Bhanju
Mallik, Chandrani
Sharma, Shyam
Choudhury, Debangshu Bhanju
Maiti, Sumana
Roy, Chhaya
author_sort Choudhury, Krishnangshu Bhanju
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The prospective interventional single-institution randomized control study was carried out to compare the pain relieving efficacy among different bisphosphonates at the cost of incidence of skeletal-related events (SRE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: During June 2008 and May 2011, 256 patients with painful bone metastasis in solid tumors with a pain score of at least 5 were randomized into three arms: zoledronic acid (4 mg, i.v.), ibandronate (6 mg, i.v.) and pamidronate (90 mg, i.v.). Radiation was given to all patients, either 800 cGy single fraction or 20 Gy in five fractions. The ANOVA test was used for analysis. The Pearson test was used to correlate pain scores with proportions of responders as statistical estimation of pain relief. RESULTS: With a mean baseline pain score of 6.5 ± 1.2, there was no difference in pain scores among the three treatment arms, assessed at 3 months and at the end of the study. However, the pain scores at 6 months were statistically reduced in zoledronic acid-receiving patients (1.5 ± 0.4) unlike the scores in patients receiving ibandronate (3.1 ± 0.5) and pamidronate (2.3 ± 0.4), with a P-value of 0.024. The response was statistically significant at 6 months (0.039) and at the end of the study (0.023), in favor of zoledronic acid. Pearson's correlation demonstrated a statistically significant positive correlation between pain scores and response rates. There were no statistical differences in the narcotic scores among the treatment arms during the study period. The overall duration of pain relief was not different in any of treatment arms. The time of detection of hypercalcemia was no different; however, the incidence of hypercalcemia was significantly less in the zoledronic acid arm (28.3%) against 44.6% and 50% in ibandronate and pamidronate arms, respectively, with a P-value of 0.041. CONCLUSION: The use of bisphosphonates for 6 months or more results in a statistical significant improvement in bone pain, more so with zoledronic acid. Hypercalcemia, an SRE, was significantly less in the zoledronic acid arm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3276818
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32768182012-02-16 A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Bisphosphonates in the Management of Painful Bone Metastasis Choudhury, Krishnangshu Bhanju Mallik, Chandrani Sharma, Shyam Choudhury, Debangshu Bhanju Maiti, Sumana Roy, Chhaya Indian J Palliat Care Original Article INTRODUCTION: The prospective interventional single-institution randomized control study was carried out to compare the pain relieving efficacy among different bisphosphonates at the cost of incidence of skeletal-related events (SRE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: During June 2008 and May 2011, 256 patients with painful bone metastasis in solid tumors with a pain score of at least 5 were randomized into three arms: zoledronic acid (4 mg, i.v.), ibandronate (6 mg, i.v.) and pamidronate (90 mg, i.v.). Radiation was given to all patients, either 800 cGy single fraction or 20 Gy in five fractions. The ANOVA test was used for analysis. The Pearson test was used to correlate pain scores with proportions of responders as statistical estimation of pain relief. RESULTS: With a mean baseline pain score of 6.5 ± 1.2, there was no difference in pain scores among the three treatment arms, assessed at 3 months and at the end of the study. However, the pain scores at 6 months were statistically reduced in zoledronic acid-receiving patients (1.5 ± 0.4) unlike the scores in patients receiving ibandronate (3.1 ± 0.5) and pamidronate (2.3 ± 0.4), with a P-value of 0.024. The response was statistically significant at 6 months (0.039) and at the end of the study (0.023), in favor of zoledronic acid. Pearson's correlation demonstrated a statistically significant positive correlation between pain scores and response rates. There were no statistical differences in the narcotic scores among the treatment arms during the study period. The overall duration of pain relief was not different in any of treatment arms. The time of detection of hypercalcemia was no different; however, the incidence of hypercalcemia was significantly less in the zoledronic acid arm (28.3%) against 44.6% and 50% in ibandronate and pamidronate arms, respectively, with a P-value of 0.041. CONCLUSION: The use of bisphosphonates for 6 months or more results in a statistical significant improvement in bone pain, more so with zoledronic acid. Hypercalcemia, an SRE, was significantly less in the zoledronic acid arm. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3276818/ /pubmed/22346045 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-1075.92338 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Palliative Care http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Choudhury, Krishnangshu Bhanju
Mallik, Chandrani
Sharma, Shyam
Choudhury, Debangshu Bhanju
Maiti, Sumana
Roy, Chhaya
A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Bisphosphonates in the Management of Painful Bone Metastasis
title A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Bisphosphonates in the Management of Painful Bone Metastasis
title_full A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Bisphosphonates in the Management of Painful Bone Metastasis
title_fullStr A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Bisphosphonates in the Management of Painful Bone Metastasis
title_full_unstemmed A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Bisphosphonates in the Management of Painful Bone Metastasis
title_short A Randomized Controlled Trial to Compare the Efficacy of Bisphosphonates in the Management of Painful Bone Metastasis
title_sort randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy of bisphosphonates in the management of painful bone metastasis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3276818/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22346045
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0973-1075.92338
work_keys_str_mv AT choudhurykrishnangshubhanju arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyofbisphosphonatesinthemanagementofpainfulbonemetastasis
AT mallikchandrani arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyofbisphosphonatesinthemanagementofpainfulbonemetastasis
AT sharmashyam arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyofbisphosphonatesinthemanagementofpainfulbonemetastasis
AT choudhurydebangshubhanju arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyofbisphosphonatesinthemanagementofpainfulbonemetastasis
AT maitisumana arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyofbisphosphonatesinthemanagementofpainfulbonemetastasis
AT roychhaya arandomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyofbisphosphonatesinthemanagementofpainfulbonemetastasis
AT choudhurykrishnangshubhanju randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyofbisphosphonatesinthemanagementofpainfulbonemetastasis
AT mallikchandrani randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyofbisphosphonatesinthemanagementofpainfulbonemetastasis
AT sharmashyam randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyofbisphosphonatesinthemanagementofpainfulbonemetastasis
AT choudhurydebangshubhanju randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyofbisphosphonatesinthemanagementofpainfulbonemetastasis
AT maitisumana randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyofbisphosphonatesinthemanagementofpainfulbonemetastasis
AT roychhaya randomizedcontrolledtrialtocomparetheefficacyofbisphosphonatesinthemanagementofpainfulbonemetastasis