Cargando…

A meta-analysis of the relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the relationship between endometrial thickness on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration and pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization cycles. DESIGN: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 484 a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Momeni, Mazdak, Rahbar, Mohammad H, Kovanci, Ertug
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3276947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22346080
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.92287
_version_ 1782223438146961408
author Momeni, Mazdak
Rahbar, Mohammad H
Kovanci, Ertug
author_facet Momeni, Mazdak
Rahbar, Mohammad H
Kovanci, Ertug
author_sort Momeni, Mazdak
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the relationship between endometrial thickness on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration and pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization cycles. DESIGN: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 484 articles using Cochrane library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase searches with various key words including endometrial thickness, pregnancy, assisted reproductive technology, endometrial pattern, and in vitro fertilization. A total of 14 studies with data on endometrial thickness and outcome were selected, representing 4922 cycles (2204 pregnant and 2718 nonpregnant). The meta-analysis with a random effects model was performed using comprehensive meta-analysis software. We calculated the standardized mean difference, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the mean endometrial thickness between pregnant and nonpregnant groups (P<0.001), with a standardized mean difference of 0.4 mm (95% CI 0.22–0.58). The OR for pregnancy was 1.40 (95% CI 1.24–1.58). CONCLUSIONS: The mean endometrial thickness was significantly higher in pregnant women compared to nonpregnant. The mean difference between two groups was <1 mm which may not be clinically meaningful. Although there may be a relationship between endometrial thickness and pregnancy, implantation potential is probably more complex than a single ultrasound measurement can determine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3276947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32769472012-02-16 A meta-analysis of the relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles Momeni, Mazdak Rahbar, Mohammad H Kovanci, Ertug J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the relationship between endometrial thickness on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration and pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization cycles. DESIGN: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 484 articles using Cochrane library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase searches with various key words including endometrial thickness, pregnancy, assisted reproductive technology, endometrial pattern, and in vitro fertilization. A total of 14 studies with data on endometrial thickness and outcome were selected, representing 4922 cycles (2204 pregnant and 2718 nonpregnant). The meta-analysis with a random effects model was performed using comprehensive meta-analysis software. We calculated the standardized mean difference, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the mean endometrial thickness between pregnant and nonpregnant groups (P<0.001), with a standardized mean difference of 0.4 mm (95% CI 0.22–0.58). The OR for pregnancy was 1.40 (95% CI 1.24–1.58). CONCLUSIONS: The mean endometrial thickness was significantly higher in pregnant women compared to nonpregnant. The mean difference between two groups was <1 mm which may not be clinically meaningful. Although there may be a relationship between endometrial thickness and pregnancy, implantation potential is probably more complex than a single ultrasound measurement can determine. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3276947/ /pubmed/22346080 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.92287 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Momeni, Mazdak
Rahbar, Mohammad H
Kovanci, Ertug
A meta-analysis of the relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles
title A meta-analysis of the relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles
title_full A meta-analysis of the relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles
title_fullStr A meta-analysis of the relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles
title_full_unstemmed A meta-analysis of the relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles
title_short A meta-analysis of the relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles
title_sort meta-analysis of the relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3276947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22346080
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.92287
work_keys_str_mv AT momenimazdak ametaanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenendometrialthicknessandoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationcycles
AT rahbarmohammadh ametaanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenendometrialthicknessandoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationcycles
AT kovanciertug ametaanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenendometrialthicknessandoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationcycles
AT momenimazdak metaanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenendometrialthicknessandoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationcycles
AT rahbarmohammadh metaanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenendometrialthicknessandoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationcycles
AT kovanciertug metaanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenendometrialthicknessandoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationcycles