Cargando…
A meta-analysis of the relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the relationship between endometrial thickness on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration and pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization cycles. DESIGN: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 484 a...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3276947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22346080 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.92287 |
_version_ | 1782223438146961408 |
---|---|
author | Momeni, Mazdak Rahbar, Mohammad H Kovanci, Ertug |
author_facet | Momeni, Mazdak Rahbar, Mohammad H Kovanci, Ertug |
author_sort | Momeni, Mazdak |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the relationship between endometrial thickness on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration and pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization cycles. DESIGN: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 484 articles using Cochrane library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase searches with various key words including endometrial thickness, pregnancy, assisted reproductive technology, endometrial pattern, and in vitro fertilization. A total of 14 studies with data on endometrial thickness and outcome were selected, representing 4922 cycles (2204 pregnant and 2718 nonpregnant). The meta-analysis with a random effects model was performed using comprehensive meta-analysis software. We calculated the standardized mean difference, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the mean endometrial thickness between pregnant and nonpregnant groups (P<0.001), with a standardized mean difference of 0.4 mm (95% CI 0.22–0.58). The OR for pregnancy was 1.40 (95% CI 1.24–1.58). CONCLUSIONS: The mean endometrial thickness was significantly higher in pregnant women compared to nonpregnant. The mean difference between two groups was <1 mm which may not be clinically meaningful. Although there may be a relationship between endometrial thickness and pregnancy, implantation potential is probably more complex than a single ultrasound measurement can determine. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3276947 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32769472012-02-16 A meta-analysis of the relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles Momeni, Mazdak Rahbar, Mohammad H Kovanci, Ertug J Hum Reprod Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the relationship between endometrial thickness on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration and pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization cycles. DESIGN: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 484 articles using Cochrane library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase searches with various key words including endometrial thickness, pregnancy, assisted reproductive technology, endometrial pattern, and in vitro fertilization. A total of 14 studies with data on endometrial thickness and outcome were selected, representing 4922 cycles (2204 pregnant and 2718 nonpregnant). The meta-analysis with a random effects model was performed using comprehensive meta-analysis software. We calculated the standardized mean difference, odds ratio (OR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: There was a significant difference in the mean endometrial thickness between pregnant and nonpregnant groups (P<0.001), with a standardized mean difference of 0.4 mm (95% CI 0.22–0.58). The OR for pregnancy was 1.40 (95% CI 1.24–1.58). CONCLUSIONS: The mean endometrial thickness was significantly higher in pregnant women compared to nonpregnant. The mean difference between two groups was <1 mm which may not be clinically meaningful. Although there may be a relationship between endometrial thickness and pregnancy, implantation potential is probably more complex than a single ultrasound measurement can determine. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3276947/ /pubmed/22346080 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.92287 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Momeni, Mazdak Rahbar, Mohammad H Kovanci, Ertug A meta-analysis of the relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles |
title | A meta-analysis of the relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles |
title_full | A meta-analysis of the relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles |
title_fullStr | A meta-analysis of the relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles |
title_full_unstemmed | A meta-analysis of the relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles |
title_short | A meta-analysis of the relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles |
title_sort | meta-analysis of the relationship between endometrial thickness and outcome of in vitro fertilization cycles |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3276947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22346080 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-1208.92287 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT momenimazdak ametaanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenendometrialthicknessandoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationcycles AT rahbarmohammadh ametaanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenendometrialthicknessandoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationcycles AT kovanciertug ametaanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenendometrialthicknessandoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationcycles AT momenimazdak metaanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenendometrialthicknessandoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationcycles AT rahbarmohammadh metaanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenendometrialthicknessandoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationcycles AT kovanciertug metaanalysisoftherelationshipbetweenendometrialthicknessandoutcomeofinvitrofertilizationcycles |