Cargando…

Empathy matters: ERP evidence for inter-individual differences in social language processing

When an adult claims he cannot sleep without his teddy bear, people tend to react surprised. Language interpretation is, thus, influenced by social context, such as who the speaker is. The present study reveals inter-individual differences in brain reactivity to social aspects of language. Whereas w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Brink, Daniëlle, Van Berkum, Jos J.A., Bastiaansen, Marcel C.M., Tesink, Cathelijne M.J.Y., Kos, Miriam, Buitelaar, Jan K., Hagoort, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3277364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21148175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq094
_version_ 1782223479120068608
author van den Brink, Daniëlle
Van Berkum, Jos J.A.
Bastiaansen, Marcel C.M.
Tesink, Cathelijne M.J.Y.
Kos, Miriam
Buitelaar, Jan K.
Hagoort, Peter
author_facet van den Brink, Daniëlle
Van Berkum, Jos J.A.
Bastiaansen, Marcel C.M.
Tesink, Cathelijne M.J.Y.
Kos, Miriam
Buitelaar, Jan K.
Hagoort, Peter
author_sort van den Brink, Daniëlle
collection PubMed
description When an adult claims he cannot sleep without his teddy bear, people tend to react surprised. Language interpretation is, thus, influenced by social context, such as who the speaker is. The present study reveals inter-individual differences in brain reactivity to social aspects of language. Whereas women showed brain reactivity when stereotype-based inferences about a speaker conflicted with the content of the message, men did not. This sex difference in social information processing can be explained by a specific cognitive trait, one’s ability to empathize. Individuals who empathize to a greater degree revealed larger N400 effects (as well as a larger increase in γ-band power) to socially relevant information. These results indicate that individuals with high-empathizing skills are able to rapidly integrate information about the speaker with the content of the message, as they make use of voice-based inferences about the speaker to process language in a top-down manner. Alternatively, individuals with lower empathizing skills did not use information about social stereotypes in implicit sentence comprehension, but rather took a more bottom-up approach to the processing of these social pragmatic sentences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3277364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32773642012-02-10 Empathy matters: ERP evidence for inter-individual differences in social language processing van den Brink, Daniëlle Van Berkum, Jos J.A. Bastiaansen, Marcel C.M. Tesink, Cathelijne M.J.Y. Kos, Miriam Buitelaar, Jan K. Hagoort, Peter Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci Original Articles When an adult claims he cannot sleep without his teddy bear, people tend to react surprised. Language interpretation is, thus, influenced by social context, such as who the speaker is. The present study reveals inter-individual differences in brain reactivity to social aspects of language. Whereas women showed brain reactivity when stereotype-based inferences about a speaker conflicted with the content of the message, men did not. This sex difference in social information processing can be explained by a specific cognitive trait, one’s ability to empathize. Individuals who empathize to a greater degree revealed larger N400 effects (as well as a larger increase in γ-band power) to socially relevant information. These results indicate that individuals with high-empathizing skills are able to rapidly integrate information about the speaker with the content of the message, as they make use of voice-based inferences about the speaker to process language in a top-down manner. Alternatively, individuals with lower empathizing skills did not use information about social stereotypes in implicit sentence comprehension, but rather took a more bottom-up approach to the processing of these social pragmatic sentences. Oxford University Press 2012-02 2010-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3277364/ /pubmed/21148175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq094 Text en © The Author (2010). Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
van den Brink, Daniëlle
Van Berkum, Jos J.A.
Bastiaansen, Marcel C.M.
Tesink, Cathelijne M.J.Y.
Kos, Miriam
Buitelaar, Jan K.
Hagoort, Peter
Empathy matters: ERP evidence for inter-individual differences in social language processing
title Empathy matters: ERP evidence for inter-individual differences in social language processing
title_full Empathy matters: ERP evidence for inter-individual differences in social language processing
title_fullStr Empathy matters: ERP evidence for inter-individual differences in social language processing
title_full_unstemmed Empathy matters: ERP evidence for inter-individual differences in social language processing
title_short Empathy matters: ERP evidence for inter-individual differences in social language processing
title_sort empathy matters: erp evidence for inter-individual differences in social language processing
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3277364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21148175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq094
work_keys_str_mv AT vandenbrinkdanielle empathymatterserpevidenceforinterindividualdifferencesinsociallanguageprocessing
AT vanberkumjosja empathymatterserpevidenceforinterindividualdifferencesinsociallanguageprocessing
AT bastiaansenmarcelcm empathymatterserpevidenceforinterindividualdifferencesinsociallanguageprocessing
AT tesinkcathelijnemjy empathymatterserpevidenceforinterindividualdifferencesinsociallanguageprocessing
AT kosmiriam empathymatterserpevidenceforinterindividualdifferencesinsociallanguageprocessing
AT buitelaarjank empathymatterserpevidenceforinterindividualdifferencesinsociallanguageprocessing
AT hagoortpeter empathymatterserpevidenceforinterindividualdifferencesinsociallanguageprocessing