Cargando…
Do Family Physicians Retrieve Synopses of Clinical Research Previously Read as Email Alerts?
BACKGROUND: A synopsis of new clinical research highlights important aspects of one study in a brief structured format. When delivered as email alerts, synopses enable clinicians to become aware of new developments relevant for practice. Once read, a synopsis can become a known item of clinical info...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Gunther Eysenbach
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22130465 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1683 |
_version_ | 1782223530079813632 |
---|---|
author | Grad, Roland Pluye, Pierre Johnson-Lafleur, Janique Granikov, Vera Shulha, Michael Bartlett, Gillian Marlow, Bernard |
author_facet | Grad, Roland Pluye, Pierre Johnson-Lafleur, Janique Granikov, Vera Shulha, Michael Bartlett, Gillian Marlow, Bernard |
author_sort | Grad, Roland |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A synopsis of new clinical research highlights important aspects of one study in a brief structured format. When delivered as email alerts, synopses enable clinicians to become aware of new developments relevant for practice. Once read, a synopsis can become a known item of clinical information. In time-pressured situations, remembering a known item may facilitate information retrieval by the clinician. However, exactly how synopses first delivered as email alerts influence retrieval at some later time is not known. OBJECTIVES: We examined searches for clinical information in which a synopsis previously read as an email alert was retrieved (defined as a dyad). Our study objectives were to (1) examine whether family physicians retrieved synopses they previously read as email alerts and then to (2) explore whether family physicians purposefully retrieved these synopses. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study in which a qualitative multiple case study explored the retrieval of email alerts within a prospective longitudinal cohort of practicing family physicians. Reading of research-based synopses was tracked in two contexts: (1) push, meaning to read on email and (2) pull, meaning to read after retrieval from one electronic knowledge resource. Dyads, defined as synopses first read as email alerts and subsequently retrieved in a search of a knowledge resource, were prospectively identified. Participants were interviewed about all of their dyads. Outcomes were the total number of dyads and their type. RESULTS: Over a period of 341 days, 194 unique synopses delivered to 41 participants resulted in 4937 synopsis readings. In all, 1205 synopses were retrieved over an average of 320 days. Of the 1205 retrieved synopses, 21 (1.7%) were dyads made by 17 family physicians. Of the 1205 retrieved synopses, 6 (0.5%) were known item type dyads. However, dyads also occurred serendipitously. CONCLUSION: In the single knowledge resource we studied, email alerts containing research-based synopses were rarely retrieved. Our findings help us to better understand the effect of push on pull and to improve the integration of research-based information within electronic resources for clinicians. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3278087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Gunther Eysenbach |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32780872012-02-13 Do Family Physicians Retrieve Synopses of Clinical Research Previously Read as Email Alerts? Grad, Roland Pluye, Pierre Johnson-Lafleur, Janique Granikov, Vera Shulha, Michael Bartlett, Gillian Marlow, Bernard J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: A synopsis of new clinical research highlights important aspects of one study in a brief structured format. When delivered as email alerts, synopses enable clinicians to become aware of new developments relevant for practice. Once read, a synopsis can become a known item of clinical information. In time-pressured situations, remembering a known item may facilitate information retrieval by the clinician. However, exactly how synopses first delivered as email alerts influence retrieval at some later time is not known. OBJECTIVES: We examined searches for clinical information in which a synopsis previously read as an email alert was retrieved (defined as a dyad). Our study objectives were to (1) examine whether family physicians retrieved synopses they previously read as email alerts and then to (2) explore whether family physicians purposefully retrieved these synopses. METHODS: We conducted a mixed-methods study in which a qualitative multiple case study explored the retrieval of email alerts within a prospective longitudinal cohort of practicing family physicians. Reading of research-based synopses was tracked in two contexts: (1) push, meaning to read on email and (2) pull, meaning to read after retrieval from one electronic knowledge resource. Dyads, defined as synopses first read as email alerts and subsequently retrieved in a search of a knowledge resource, were prospectively identified. Participants were interviewed about all of their dyads. Outcomes were the total number of dyads and their type. RESULTS: Over a period of 341 days, 194 unique synopses delivered to 41 participants resulted in 4937 synopsis readings. In all, 1205 synopses were retrieved over an average of 320 days. Of the 1205 retrieved synopses, 21 (1.7%) were dyads made by 17 family physicians. Of the 1205 retrieved synopses, 6 (0.5%) were known item type dyads. However, dyads also occurred serendipitously. CONCLUSION: In the single knowledge resource we studied, email alerts containing research-based synopses were rarely retrieved. Our findings help us to better understand the effect of push on pull and to improve the integration of research-based information within electronic resources for clinicians. Gunther Eysenbach 2011-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3278087/ /pubmed/22130465 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1683 Text en ©Roland Grad, Pierre Pluye, Janique Johnson-Lafleur, Vera Granikov, Michael Shulha, Gillian Bartlett, Bernard Marlow. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 30.11.2011. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Grad, Roland Pluye, Pierre Johnson-Lafleur, Janique Granikov, Vera Shulha, Michael Bartlett, Gillian Marlow, Bernard Do Family Physicians Retrieve Synopses of Clinical Research Previously Read as Email Alerts? |
title | Do Family Physicians Retrieve Synopses of Clinical Research Previously Read as Email Alerts? |
title_full | Do Family Physicians Retrieve Synopses of Clinical Research Previously Read as Email Alerts? |
title_fullStr | Do Family Physicians Retrieve Synopses of Clinical Research Previously Read as Email Alerts? |
title_full_unstemmed | Do Family Physicians Retrieve Synopses of Clinical Research Previously Read as Email Alerts? |
title_short | Do Family Physicians Retrieve Synopses of Clinical Research Previously Read as Email Alerts? |
title_sort | do family physicians retrieve synopses of clinical research previously read as email alerts? |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22130465 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1683 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gradroland dofamilyphysiciansretrievesynopsesofclinicalresearchpreviouslyreadasemailalerts AT pluyepierre dofamilyphysiciansretrievesynopsesofclinicalresearchpreviouslyreadasemailalerts AT johnsonlafleurjanique dofamilyphysiciansretrievesynopsesofclinicalresearchpreviouslyreadasemailalerts AT granikovvera dofamilyphysiciansretrievesynopsesofclinicalresearchpreviouslyreadasemailalerts AT shulhamichael dofamilyphysiciansretrievesynopsesofclinicalresearchpreviouslyreadasemailalerts AT bartlettgillian dofamilyphysiciansretrievesynopsesofclinicalresearchpreviouslyreadasemailalerts AT marlowbernard dofamilyphysiciansretrievesynopsesofclinicalresearchpreviouslyreadasemailalerts |