Cargando…

Functional evaluation of the urinary tract by duplex Doppler ultrasonography in patients with acute renal colic

PURPOSE: To determine the role of duplex Doppler ultrasonography (DDU) in patients with acute unilateral renal obstruction. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 161 patients with suspected renal colic due to urolithiasis were evaluated by DDU followed by intravenous urography (IVU). The mean intra-arter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sayani, Raza, Ali, Muhammad, Shazlee, Kashif, Hamid, Rana Shoaib, Hamid, Kamran
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22334796
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJNRD.S27628
_version_ 1782223542567305216
author Sayani, Raza
Ali, Muhammad
Shazlee, Kashif
Hamid, Rana Shoaib
Hamid, Kamran
author_facet Sayani, Raza
Ali, Muhammad
Shazlee, Kashif
Hamid, Rana Shoaib
Hamid, Kamran
author_sort Sayani, Raza
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine the role of duplex Doppler ultrasonography (DDU) in patients with acute unilateral renal obstruction. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 161 patients with suspected renal colic due to urolithiasis were evaluated by DDU followed by intravenous urography (IVU). The mean intra-arterial resistive index (RI) and the difference of mean resistive index between both kidneys (delta RI) were determined for each person. An RI value of ≥0.70 and a delta RI value of ≥0.06 were taken as the discriminatory threshold for obstruction. IVU results were considered the “ reference standard” against which renal DDU findings were compared. RESULTS: IVU showed both kidneys to be normal in 51 patients and with unilateral ureteric obstruction in 110 patients. The mean RI for obstructed kidneys was 0.67 (0.048), which was significantly higher (P-value <0.05) than a mean RI of contralateral normal kidneys 0.59 (0.04). The mean delta RI in patients with unilateral ureteric obstruction was significantly higher than that in patients with normal kidneys, at 0.076 (0.03) and 0.03 (0.05), respectively. In patients with complete obstruction, sensitivity of RI and delta RI were 77.5% and 92.5% with a specificity of 84.3% and 90.1%, respectively. In patients with partial obstruction, the sensitivity of these values was 22.8% and 62.8% with a specificity of 84.3% and 90.1%. CONCLUSION: Delta RI is more sensitive and specific than RI in acute renal obstruction. However, due to relatively low sensitivity for detection of partial obstruction, DDU cannot replace IVU as the standard imaging technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3278255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32782552012-02-14 Functional evaluation of the urinary tract by duplex Doppler ultrasonography in patients with acute renal colic Sayani, Raza Ali, Muhammad Shazlee, Kashif Hamid, Rana Shoaib Hamid, Kamran Int J Nephrol Renovasc Dis Original Research PURPOSE: To determine the role of duplex Doppler ultrasonography (DDU) in patients with acute unilateral renal obstruction. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 161 patients with suspected renal colic due to urolithiasis were evaluated by DDU followed by intravenous urography (IVU). The mean intra-arterial resistive index (RI) and the difference of mean resistive index between both kidneys (delta RI) were determined for each person. An RI value of ≥0.70 and a delta RI value of ≥0.06 were taken as the discriminatory threshold for obstruction. IVU results were considered the “ reference standard” against which renal DDU findings were compared. RESULTS: IVU showed both kidneys to be normal in 51 patients and with unilateral ureteric obstruction in 110 patients. The mean RI for obstructed kidneys was 0.67 (0.048), which was significantly higher (P-value <0.05) than a mean RI of contralateral normal kidneys 0.59 (0.04). The mean delta RI in patients with unilateral ureteric obstruction was significantly higher than that in patients with normal kidneys, at 0.076 (0.03) and 0.03 (0.05), respectively. In patients with complete obstruction, sensitivity of RI and delta RI were 77.5% and 92.5% with a specificity of 84.3% and 90.1%, respectively. In patients with partial obstruction, the sensitivity of these values was 22.8% and 62.8% with a specificity of 84.3% and 90.1%. CONCLUSION: Delta RI is more sensitive and specific than RI in acute renal obstruction. However, due to relatively low sensitivity for detection of partial obstruction, DDU cannot replace IVU as the standard imaging technique. Dove Medical Press 2011-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3278255/ /pubmed/22334796 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJNRD.S27628 Text en © 2012 Sayani et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Sayani, Raza
Ali, Muhammad
Shazlee, Kashif
Hamid, Rana Shoaib
Hamid, Kamran
Functional evaluation of the urinary tract by duplex Doppler ultrasonography in patients with acute renal colic
title Functional evaluation of the urinary tract by duplex Doppler ultrasonography in patients with acute renal colic
title_full Functional evaluation of the urinary tract by duplex Doppler ultrasonography in patients with acute renal colic
title_fullStr Functional evaluation of the urinary tract by duplex Doppler ultrasonography in patients with acute renal colic
title_full_unstemmed Functional evaluation of the urinary tract by duplex Doppler ultrasonography in patients with acute renal colic
title_short Functional evaluation of the urinary tract by duplex Doppler ultrasonography in patients with acute renal colic
title_sort functional evaluation of the urinary tract by duplex doppler ultrasonography in patients with acute renal colic
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22334796
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJNRD.S27628
work_keys_str_mv AT sayaniraza functionalevaluationoftheurinarytractbyduplexdopplerultrasonographyinpatientswithacuterenalcolic
AT alimuhammad functionalevaluationoftheurinarytractbyduplexdopplerultrasonographyinpatientswithacuterenalcolic
AT shazleekashif functionalevaluationoftheurinarytractbyduplexdopplerultrasonographyinpatientswithacuterenalcolic
AT hamidranashoaib functionalevaluationoftheurinarytractbyduplexdopplerultrasonographyinpatientswithacuterenalcolic
AT hamidkamran functionalevaluationoftheurinarytractbyduplexdopplerultrasonographyinpatientswithacuterenalcolic