Cargando…

Tetanus seropositive prevalence and perceived protection from emergency admissions

BACKGROUND: Emergency physicians see many people who present to the emergency department stating that they are immunized against tetanus, when in fact, they are not. The patient history is not dependable for determining true tetanus status and simple patient surveys do not provide actual prevalence....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moore, Marcus A., Barber, Kimberly R., Britt, Todd
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Co-Action Publishing 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22461848
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ehtj.v5i0.7718
_version_ 1782223544408604672
author Moore, Marcus A.
Barber, Kimberly R.
Britt, Todd
author_facet Moore, Marcus A.
Barber, Kimberly R.
Britt, Todd
author_sort Moore, Marcus A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Emergency physicians see many people who present to the emergency department stating that they are immunized against tetanus, when in fact, they are not. The patient history is not dependable for determining true tetanus status and simple patient surveys do not provide actual prevalence. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of tetanus status by antibody titer seropositivity and quantify such status among patients reporting tetanus protection. METHODS: This study is a single center prospective convenience sample of patients presenting to the emergency department 12 years of age or older. Patients deemed study candidates and willing to be in the study filled out an eight-question questionnaire that included the question ‘is your tetanus shot up to date’. A blood sample was then drawn for tetanus antibody titer and quantified according to a pre-determined cutoff for protection. RESULTS: A total of 163 patients were enrolled. Of patients responding yes to the query ‘is your tetanus shot up to date’ 12.8% (N=5) of them were not seropositive. Of the 26 people who were seronegative in the study all had been to a doctor in the past year and 88.5% (N=23) had been to their family physician. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that it may be difficult to trust the tetanus immunization history given by patients presenting to the emergency room. The study also observed that a large percentage of patients who were serenegative were seen by a primary care physician and not had a necessary tetanus immunization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3278263
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Co-Action Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32782632012-02-16 Tetanus seropositive prevalence and perceived protection from emergency admissions Moore, Marcus A. Barber, Kimberly R. Britt, Todd Emerg Health Threats J Original Article BACKGROUND: Emergency physicians see many people who present to the emergency department stating that they are immunized against tetanus, when in fact, they are not. The patient history is not dependable for determining true tetanus status and simple patient surveys do not provide actual prevalence. The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence of tetanus status by antibody titer seropositivity and quantify such status among patients reporting tetanus protection. METHODS: This study is a single center prospective convenience sample of patients presenting to the emergency department 12 years of age or older. Patients deemed study candidates and willing to be in the study filled out an eight-question questionnaire that included the question ‘is your tetanus shot up to date’. A blood sample was then drawn for tetanus antibody titer and quantified according to a pre-determined cutoff for protection. RESULTS: A total of 163 patients were enrolled. Of patients responding yes to the query ‘is your tetanus shot up to date’ 12.8% (N=5) of them were not seropositive. Of the 26 people who were seronegative in the study all had been to a doctor in the past year and 88.5% (N=23) had been to their family physician. CONCLUSION: The study suggests that it may be difficult to trust the tetanus immunization history given by patients presenting to the emergency room. The study also observed that a large percentage of patients who were serenegative were seen by a primary care physician and not had a necessary tetanus immunization. Co-Action Publishing 2012-02-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3278263/ /pubmed/22461848 http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ehtj.v5i0.7718 Text en © 2012 Kimberly Barber et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Moore, Marcus A.
Barber, Kimberly R.
Britt, Todd
Tetanus seropositive prevalence and perceived protection from emergency admissions
title Tetanus seropositive prevalence and perceived protection from emergency admissions
title_full Tetanus seropositive prevalence and perceived protection from emergency admissions
title_fullStr Tetanus seropositive prevalence and perceived protection from emergency admissions
title_full_unstemmed Tetanus seropositive prevalence and perceived protection from emergency admissions
title_short Tetanus seropositive prevalence and perceived protection from emergency admissions
title_sort tetanus seropositive prevalence and perceived protection from emergency admissions
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278263/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22461848
http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/ehtj.v5i0.7718
work_keys_str_mv AT mooremarcusa tetanusseropositiveprevalenceandperceivedprotectionfromemergencyadmissions
AT barberkimberlyr tetanusseropositiveprevalenceandperceivedprotectionfromemergencyadmissions
AT britttodd tetanusseropositiveprevalenceandperceivedprotectionfromemergencyadmissions