Cargando…

Clinical decision making in spinal fusion for chronic low back pain. Results of a nationwide survey among spine surgeons

OBJECTIVES: To assess the use of prognostic patient factors and predictive tests in clinical decision making for spinal fusion in patients with chronic low back pain. DESIGN AND SETTING: Nationwide survey among spine surgeons in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Surgeon members of the Dutch Spine Socie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Willems, Paul, de Bie, Rob, Öner, Cumhur, Castelein, René, de Kleuver, Marinus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22189352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000391
_version_ 1782223582439407616
author Willems, Paul
de Bie, Rob
Öner, Cumhur
Castelein, René
de Kleuver, Marinus
author_facet Willems, Paul
de Bie, Rob
Öner, Cumhur
Castelein, René
de Kleuver, Marinus
author_sort Willems, Paul
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the use of prognostic patient factors and predictive tests in clinical decision making for spinal fusion in patients with chronic low back pain. DESIGN AND SETTING: Nationwide survey among spine surgeons in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Surgeon members of the Dutch Spine Society were questioned on their surgical treatment strategy for chronic low back pain. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The surgeons' opinion on the use of prognostic patient factors and predictive tests for patient selection were addressed on Likert scales, and the degree of uniformity was assessed. In addition, the influence of surgeon-specific factors, such as clinical experience and training, on decision making was determined. RESULTS: The comments from 62 surgeons (70% response rate) were analysed. Forty-four surgeons (71%) had extensive clinical experience. There was a statistically significant lack of uniformity of opinion in seven of the 11 items on prognostic factors and eight of the 11 items on predictive tests, respectively. Imaging was valued much higher than predictive tests, psychological screening or patient preferences (all p<0.01). Apart from the use of discography and long multisegment fusions, differences in training or clinical experience did not appear to be of significant influence on treatment strategy. CONCLUSIONS: The present survey showed a lack of consensus among spine surgeons on the appreciation and use of predictive tests. Prognostic patient factors were not consistently incorporated in their treatment strategy either. Clinical decision making for spinal fusion to treat chronic low back pain does not have a uniform evidence base in practice. Future research should focus on identifying subgroups of patients for whom spinal fusion is an effective treatment, as only a reliable prediction of surgical outcome, combined with the implementation of individual patient factors, may enable the instalment of consensus guidelines for surgical decision making in patients with chronic low back pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3278483
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32784832012-02-28 Clinical decision making in spinal fusion for chronic low back pain. Results of a nationwide survey among spine surgeons Willems, Paul de Bie, Rob Öner, Cumhur Castelein, René de Kleuver, Marinus BMJ Open Evidence-Based Practice OBJECTIVES: To assess the use of prognostic patient factors and predictive tests in clinical decision making for spinal fusion in patients with chronic low back pain. DESIGN AND SETTING: Nationwide survey among spine surgeons in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Surgeon members of the Dutch Spine Society were questioned on their surgical treatment strategy for chronic low back pain. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The surgeons' opinion on the use of prognostic patient factors and predictive tests for patient selection were addressed on Likert scales, and the degree of uniformity was assessed. In addition, the influence of surgeon-specific factors, such as clinical experience and training, on decision making was determined. RESULTS: The comments from 62 surgeons (70% response rate) were analysed. Forty-four surgeons (71%) had extensive clinical experience. There was a statistically significant lack of uniformity of opinion in seven of the 11 items on prognostic factors and eight of the 11 items on predictive tests, respectively. Imaging was valued much higher than predictive tests, psychological screening or patient preferences (all p<0.01). Apart from the use of discography and long multisegment fusions, differences in training or clinical experience did not appear to be of significant influence on treatment strategy. CONCLUSIONS: The present survey showed a lack of consensus among spine surgeons on the appreciation and use of predictive tests. Prognostic patient factors were not consistently incorporated in their treatment strategy either. Clinical decision making for spinal fusion to treat chronic low back pain does not have a uniform evidence base in practice. Future research should focus on identifying subgroups of patients for whom spinal fusion is an effective treatment, as only a reliable prediction of surgical outcome, combined with the implementation of individual patient factors, may enable the instalment of consensus guidelines for surgical decision making in patients with chronic low back pain. BMJ Group 2011-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3278483/ /pubmed/22189352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000391 Text en © 2011, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Evidence-Based Practice
Willems, Paul
de Bie, Rob
Öner, Cumhur
Castelein, René
de Kleuver, Marinus
Clinical decision making in spinal fusion for chronic low back pain. Results of a nationwide survey among spine surgeons
title Clinical decision making in spinal fusion for chronic low back pain. Results of a nationwide survey among spine surgeons
title_full Clinical decision making in spinal fusion for chronic low back pain. Results of a nationwide survey among spine surgeons
title_fullStr Clinical decision making in spinal fusion for chronic low back pain. Results of a nationwide survey among spine surgeons
title_full_unstemmed Clinical decision making in spinal fusion for chronic low back pain. Results of a nationwide survey among spine surgeons
title_short Clinical decision making in spinal fusion for chronic low back pain. Results of a nationwide survey among spine surgeons
title_sort clinical decision making in spinal fusion for chronic low back pain. results of a nationwide survey among spine surgeons
topic Evidence-Based Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278483/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22189352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000391
work_keys_str_mv AT willemspaul clinicaldecisionmakinginspinalfusionforchroniclowbackpainresultsofanationwidesurveyamongspinesurgeons
AT debierob clinicaldecisionmakinginspinalfusionforchroniclowbackpainresultsofanationwidesurveyamongspinesurgeons
AT onercumhur clinicaldecisionmakinginspinalfusionforchroniclowbackpainresultsofanationwidesurveyamongspinesurgeons
AT casteleinrene clinicaldecisionmakinginspinalfusionforchroniclowbackpainresultsofanationwidesurveyamongspinesurgeons
AT dekleuvermarinus clinicaldecisionmakinginspinalfusionforchroniclowbackpainresultsofanationwidesurveyamongspinesurgeons