Cargando…

Cancer risk with folic acid supplements: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To explore if there is an increased cancer risk associated with folic acid supplements given orally. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled studies of folic acid supplementation in humans reporting cancer incidence and/or cancer mortality. Studies on folic acid fortific...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wien, Tale Norbye, Pike, Eva, Wisløff, Torbjørn, Staff, Annetine, Smeland, Sigbjørn, Klemp, Marianne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Group 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22240654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000653
_version_ 1782223583136710656
author Wien, Tale Norbye
Pike, Eva
Wisløff, Torbjørn
Staff, Annetine
Smeland, Sigbjørn
Klemp, Marianne
author_facet Wien, Tale Norbye
Pike, Eva
Wisløff, Torbjørn
Staff, Annetine
Smeland, Sigbjørn
Klemp, Marianne
author_sort Wien, Tale Norbye
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore if there is an increased cancer risk associated with folic acid supplements given orally. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled studies of folic acid supplementation in humans reporting cancer incidence and/or cancer mortality. Studies on folic acid fortification of foods were not included. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase and Centre of Reviews and Dissemination, clinical trial registries and hand-searching of key journals. RESULTS: From 4104 potential references, 19 studies contributed data to our meta-analyses, including 12 randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Meta-analysis of the 10 RCTs reporting overall cancer incidence (N=38 233) gave an RR of developing cancer in patients randomised to folic acid supplements of 1.07 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.14) compared to controls. Overall cancer incidence was not reported in the seven observational studies. Meta-analyses of six RCTs reporting prostate cancer incidence showed an RR of prostate cancer of 1.24 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.49) for the men receiving folic acid compared to controls. No significant difference in cancer incidence was shown between groups receiving folic acid and placebo/control group, for any other cancer type. Total cancer mortality was reported in six RCTs, and a meta-analysis of these did not show any significant difference in cancer mortality in folic acid supplemented groups compared to controls (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.30). None of the observational studies addressed mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A meta-analysis of 10 RCTs showed a borderline significant increase in frequency of overall cancer in the folic acid group compared to controls. Overall cancer incidence was not reported in the seven observational studies. Prostate cancer was the only cancer type found to be increased after folic acid supplementation (meta-analyses of six RCTs). Prospective studies of cancer development in populations where food is fortified with folic acid could indicate whether fortification similar to supplementation moderately increases prostate cancer risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3278486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BMJ Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32784862012-02-17 Cancer risk with folic acid supplements: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wien, Tale Norbye Pike, Eva Wisløff, Torbjørn Staff, Annetine Smeland, Sigbjørn Klemp, Marianne BMJ Open Oncology OBJECTIVE: To explore if there is an increased cancer risk associated with folic acid supplements given orally. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled studies of folic acid supplementation in humans reporting cancer incidence and/or cancer mortality. Studies on folic acid fortification of foods were not included. DATA SOURCES: Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase and Centre of Reviews and Dissemination, clinical trial registries and hand-searching of key journals. RESULTS: From 4104 potential references, 19 studies contributed data to our meta-analyses, including 12 randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Meta-analysis of the 10 RCTs reporting overall cancer incidence (N=38 233) gave an RR of developing cancer in patients randomised to folic acid supplements of 1.07 (95% CI 1.00 to 1.14) compared to controls. Overall cancer incidence was not reported in the seven observational studies. Meta-analyses of six RCTs reporting prostate cancer incidence showed an RR of prostate cancer of 1.24 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.49) for the men receiving folic acid compared to controls. No significant difference in cancer incidence was shown between groups receiving folic acid and placebo/control group, for any other cancer type. Total cancer mortality was reported in six RCTs, and a meta-analysis of these did not show any significant difference in cancer mortality in folic acid supplemented groups compared to controls (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.30). None of the observational studies addressed mortality. CONCLUSIONS: A meta-analysis of 10 RCTs showed a borderline significant increase in frequency of overall cancer in the folic acid group compared to controls. Overall cancer incidence was not reported in the seven observational studies. Prostate cancer was the only cancer type found to be increased after folic acid supplementation (meta-analyses of six RCTs). Prospective studies of cancer development in populations where food is fortified with folic acid could indicate whether fortification similar to supplementation moderately increases prostate cancer risk. BMJ Group 2012-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3278486/ /pubmed/22240654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000653 Text en © 2012, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non commercial and is otherwise in compliance with the license. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/ and http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/legalcode.
spellingShingle Oncology
Wien, Tale Norbye
Pike, Eva
Wisløff, Torbjørn
Staff, Annetine
Smeland, Sigbjørn
Klemp, Marianne
Cancer risk with folic acid supplements: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Cancer risk with folic acid supplements: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Cancer risk with folic acid supplements: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Cancer risk with folic acid supplements: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Cancer risk with folic acid supplements: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Cancer risk with folic acid supplements: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort cancer risk with folic acid supplements: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22240654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000653
work_keys_str_mv AT wientalenorbye cancerriskwithfolicacidsupplementsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT pikeeva cancerriskwithfolicacidsupplementsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wisløfftorbjørn cancerriskwithfolicacidsupplementsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT staffannetine cancerriskwithfolicacidsupplementsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT smelandsigbjørn cancerriskwithfolicacidsupplementsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT klempmarianne cancerriskwithfolicacidsupplementsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis