Cargando…
Is the 1-cm Rule of Distal Bowel Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Based on Clinical Evidence? A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: Distal intramural spread is present within 1 cm from visible tumor in a substantial proportion of patients. Therefore, ≥1 cm of distal bowel clearance is recommended as minimally acceptable. However, clinical results are contradictory in answering the question of whether this rule is val...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21879269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2035-2 |
_version_ | 1782223591003127808 |
---|---|
author | Bujko, Krzysztof Rutkowski, Andrzej Chang, George J. Michalski, Wojciech Chmielik, Ewa Kusnierz, Jerzy |
author_facet | Bujko, Krzysztof Rutkowski, Andrzej Chang, George J. Michalski, Wojciech Chmielik, Ewa Kusnierz, Jerzy |
author_sort | Bujko, Krzysztof |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Distal intramural spread is present within 1 cm from visible tumor in a substantial proportion of patients. Therefore, ≥1 cm of distal bowel clearance is recommended as minimally acceptable. However, clinical results are contradictory in answering the question of whether this rule is valid. The aim of this review was to evaluate whether in patients undergoing anterior resection, a distal bowel gross margin of <1 cm jeopardizes oncologic safety. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature identified 17 studies showing results in relation to margins of approximately <1 cm (948 patients) versus >1 cm (4626 patients); five studies in relation to a margin of ≤5 mm (173 patients) versus >5 mm (1277 patients), and five studies showing results in a margin of ≤2 mm (73 patients). In most studies, pre- or postoperative radiation was provided. RESULTS: A multifactorial process was identified resulting in selection of favorable tumors for anterior resection with the short bowel margin and unfavorable tumors for abdominoperineal resection or for anterior resection with the long margin. In total, the local recurrence rate was 1.0% higher in the <1-cm margin group compared to the >1-cm margin group (95% confidence interval [CI] −0.6 to 2.7; P = 0.175). The corresponding figures for ≤5 mm cutoff point were 1.7% (95% CI −1.9 to 5.3; P = 0.375). The pooled local recurrence rate in patients having ≤2 mm margin was 2.7% (95% CI 0 to 6.4). CONCLUSIONS: In the selected group of patients, <1 cm margin did not jeopardize oncologic safety. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3278608 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32786082012-02-21 Is the 1-cm Rule of Distal Bowel Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Based on Clinical Evidence? A Systematic Review Bujko, Krzysztof Rutkowski, Andrzej Chang, George J. Michalski, Wojciech Chmielik, Ewa Kusnierz, Jerzy Ann Surg Oncol Colorectal Cancer BACKGROUND: Distal intramural spread is present within 1 cm from visible tumor in a substantial proportion of patients. Therefore, ≥1 cm of distal bowel clearance is recommended as minimally acceptable. However, clinical results are contradictory in answering the question of whether this rule is valid. The aim of this review was to evaluate whether in patients undergoing anterior resection, a distal bowel gross margin of <1 cm jeopardizes oncologic safety. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature identified 17 studies showing results in relation to margins of approximately <1 cm (948 patients) versus >1 cm (4626 patients); five studies in relation to a margin of ≤5 mm (173 patients) versus >5 mm (1277 patients), and five studies showing results in a margin of ≤2 mm (73 patients). In most studies, pre- or postoperative radiation was provided. RESULTS: A multifactorial process was identified resulting in selection of favorable tumors for anterior resection with the short bowel margin and unfavorable tumors for abdominoperineal resection or for anterior resection with the long margin. In total, the local recurrence rate was 1.0% higher in the <1-cm margin group compared to the >1-cm margin group (95% confidence interval [CI] −0.6 to 2.7; P = 0.175). The corresponding figures for ≤5 mm cutoff point were 1.7% (95% CI −1.9 to 5.3; P = 0.375). The pooled local recurrence rate in patients having ≤2 mm margin was 2.7% (95% CI 0 to 6.4). CONCLUSIONS: In the selected group of patients, <1 cm margin did not jeopardize oncologic safety. Springer-Verlag 2011-08-31 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3278608/ /pubmed/21879269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2035-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Colorectal Cancer Bujko, Krzysztof Rutkowski, Andrzej Chang, George J. Michalski, Wojciech Chmielik, Ewa Kusnierz, Jerzy Is the 1-cm Rule of Distal Bowel Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Based on Clinical Evidence? A Systematic Review |
title | Is the 1-cm Rule of Distal Bowel Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Based on Clinical Evidence? A Systematic Review |
title_full | Is the 1-cm Rule of Distal Bowel Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Based on Clinical Evidence? A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Is the 1-cm Rule of Distal Bowel Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Based on Clinical Evidence? A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Is the 1-cm Rule of Distal Bowel Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Based on Clinical Evidence? A Systematic Review |
title_short | Is the 1-cm Rule of Distal Bowel Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Based on Clinical Evidence? A Systematic Review |
title_sort | is the 1-cm rule of distal bowel resection margin in rectal cancer based on clinical evidence? a systematic review |
topic | Colorectal Cancer |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21879269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2035-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bujkokrzysztof isthe1cmruleofdistalbowelresectionmargininrectalcancerbasedonclinicalevidenceasystematicreview AT rutkowskiandrzej isthe1cmruleofdistalbowelresectionmargininrectalcancerbasedonclinicalevidenceasystematicreview AT changgeorgej isthe1cmruleofdistalbowelresectionmargininrectalcancerbasedonclinicalevidenceasystematicreview AT michalskiwojciech isthe1cmruleofdistalbowelresectionmargininrectalcancerbasedonclinicalevidenceasystematicreview AT chmielikewa isthe1cmruleofdistalbowelresectionmargininrectalcancerbasedonclinicalevidenceasystematicreview AT kusnierzjerzy isthe1cmruleofdistalbowelresectionmargininrectalcancerbasedonclinicalevidenceasystematicreview |