Cargando…

Is the 1-cm Rule of Distal Bowel Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Based on Clinical Evidence? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Distal intramural spread is present within 1 cm from visible tumor in a substantial proportion of patients. Therefore, ≥1 cm of distal bowel clearance is recommended as minimally acceptable. However, clinical results are contradictory in answering the question of whether this rule is val...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bujko, Krzysztof, Rutkowski, Andrzej, Chang, George J., Michalski, Wojciech, Chmielik, Ewa, Kusnierz, Jerzy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21879269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2035-2
_version_ 1782223591003127808
author Bujko, Krzysztof
Rutkowski, Andrzej
Chang, George J.
Michalski, Wojciech
Chmielik, Ewa
Kusnierz, Jerzy
author_facet Bujko, Krzysztof
Rutkowski, Andrzej
Chang, George J.
Michalski, Wojciech
Chmielik, Ewa
Kusnierz, Jerzy
author_sort Bujko, Krzysztof
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Distal intramural spread is present within 1 cm from visible tumor in a substantial proportion of patients. Therefore, ≥1 cm of distal bowel clearance is recommended as minimally acceptable. However, clinical results are contradictory in answering the question of whether this rule is valid. The aim of this review was to evaluate whether in patients undergoing anterior resection, a distal bowel gross margin of <1 cm jeopardizes oncologic safety. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature identified 17 studies showing results in relation to margins of approximately <1 cm (948 patients) versus >1 cm (4626 patients); five studies in relation to a margin of ≤5 mm (173 patients) versus >5 mm (1277 patients), and five studies showing results in a margin of ≤2 mm (73 patients). In most studies, pre- or postoperative radiation was provided. RESULTS: A multifactorial process was identified resulting in selection of favorable tumors for anterior resection with the short bowel margin and unfavorable tumors for abdominoperineal resection or for anterior resection with the long margin. In total, the local recurrence rate was 1.0% higher in the <1-cm margin group compared to the >1-cm margin group (95% confidence interval [CI] −0.6 to 2.7; P = 0.175). The corresponding figures for ≤5 mm cutoff point were 1.7% (95% CI −1.9 to 5.3; P = 0.375). The pooled local recurrence rate in patients having ≤2 mm margin was 2.7% (95% CI 0 to 6.4). CONCLUSIONS: In the selected group of patients, <1 cm margin did not jeopardize oncologic safety.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3278608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32786082012-02-21 Is the 1-cm Rule of Distal Bowel Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Based on Clinical Evidence? A Systematic Review Bujko, Krzysztof Rutkowski, Andrzej Chang, George J. Michalski, Wojciech Chmielik, Ewa Kusnierz, Jerzy Ann Surg Oncol Colorectal Cancer BACKGROUND: Distal intramural spread is present within 1 cm from visible tumor in a substantial proportion of patients. Therefore, ≥1 cm of distal bowel clearance is recommended as minimally acceptable. However, clinical results are contradictory in answering the question of whether this rule is valid. The aim of this review was to evaluate whether in patients undergoing anterior resection, a distal bowel gross margin of <1 cm jeopardizes oncologic safety. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature identified 17 studies showing results in relation to margins of approximately <1 cm (948 patients) versus >1 cm (4626 patients); five studies in relation to a margin of ≤5 mm (173 patients) versus >5 mm (1277 patients), and five studies showing results in a margin of ≤2 mm (73 patients). In most studies, pre- or postoperative radiation was provided. RESULTS: A multifactorial process was identified resulting in selection of favorable tumors for anterior resection with the short bowel margin and unfavorable tumors for abdominoperineal resection or for anterior resection with the long margin. In total, the local recurrence rate was 1.0% higher in the <1-cm margin group compared to the >1-cm margin group (95% confidence interval [CI] −0.6 to 2.7; P = 0.175). The corresponding figures for ≤5 mm cutoff point were 1.7% (95% CI −1.9 to 5.3; P = 0.375). The pooled local recurrence rate in patients having ≤2 mm margin was 2.7% (95% CI 0 to 6.4). CONCLUSIONS: In the selected group of patients, <1 cm margin did not jeopardize oncologic safety. Springer-Verlag 2011-08-31 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3278608/ /pubmed/21879269 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2035-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Colorectal Cancer
Bujko, Krzysztof
Rutkowski, Andrzej
Chang, George J.
Michalski, Wojciech
Chmielik, Ewa
Kusnierz, Jerzy
Is the 1-cm Rule of Distal Bowel Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Based on Clinical Evidence? A Systematic Review
title Is the 1-cm Rule of Distal Bowel Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Based on Clinical Evidence? A Systematic Review
title_full Is the 1-cm Rule of Distal Bowel Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Based on Clinical Evidence? A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Is the 1-cm Rule of Distal Bowel Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Based on Clinical Evidence? A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Is the 1-cm Rule of Distal Bowel Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Based on Clinical Evidence? A Systematic Review
title_short Is the 1-cm Rule of Distal Bowel Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer Based on Clinical Evidence? A Systematic Review
title_sort is the 1-cm rule of distal bowel resection margin in rectal cancer based on clinical evidence? a systematic review
topic Colorectal Cancer
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21879269
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-011-2035-2
work_keys_str_mv AT bujkokrzysztof isthe1cmruleofdistalbowelresectionmargininrectalcancerbasedonclinicalevidenceasystematicreview
AT rutkowskiandrzej isthe1cmruleofdistalbowelresectionmargininrectalcancerbasedonclinicalevidenceasystematicreview
AT changgeorgej isthe1cmruleofdistalbowelresectionmargininrectalcancerbasedonclinicalevidenceasystematicreview
AT michalskiwojciech isthe1cmruleofdistalbowelresectionmargininrectalcancerbasedonclinicalevidenceasystematicreview
AT chmielikewa isthe1cmruleofdistalbowelresectionmargininrectalcancerbasedonclinicalevidenceasystematicreview
AT kusnierzjerzy isthe1cmruleofdistalbowelresectionmargininrectalcancerbasedonclinicalevidenceasystematicreview