Cargando…

Operative and nonoperative treatment of clavicle fractures in adults: A systematic review of 1,190 patients from the literature

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Traditionally, clavicle fractures have been treated nonoperatively. However, many recent studies have concentrated on the results of operative treatment. We assessed and compared the outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment for acute clavicle fractures in adults. METH...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Virtanen, Kaisa J, Malmivaara, Antti O V, Remes, Ville M, Paavola, Mika P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Informa Healthcare 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22248169
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.652884
_version_ 1782223601735303168
author Virtanen, Kaisa J
Malmivaara, Antti O V
Remes, Ville M
Paavola, Mika P
author_facet Virtanen, Kaisa J
Malmivaara, Antti O V
Remes, Ville M
Paavola, Mika P
author_sort Virtanen, Kaisa J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Traditionally, clavicle fractures have been treated nonoperatively. However, many recent studies have concentrated on the results of operative treatment. We assessed and compared the outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment for acute clavicle fractures in adults. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of the medical literature from 1966 until the end of March 2011. We included randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials comparing operative and nonoperative treatment and studies comparing different operative and nonoperative treatments. We required that there should be at least 30 adult patients and a follow-up of at least 6 months in each individual trial. We used the GRADE method to assess the quality of evidence. RESULTS: 6 randomized controlled trials (n = 631) and 7 controlled clinical trials (n = 559) were included. There was moderate-quality evidence (i.e. of grade B) (1) that surgery has considerable effectiveness on better function and less disability at short follow-up, (2) of similar risk of relatively mild complications after operative or nonoperative treatment, (3) that delayed union and nonunion were more common in patients who were treated nonoperatively than in those treated operatively, and (4) that the osteosynthesis method had no effect on the incidence of delayed union or nonunion. Only 1 controlled clinical trial was found on lateral clavicle fractures with very limited (grade D) evidence. INTERPRETATION: Patients treated operatively have slightly better function and less disability than those treated nonoperatively at short follow-up, but then the effectiveness diminishes and is weak at 6 months. The different operative techniques may not differ in effectiveness or in adverse effects, but the evidence is very limited or conflicting. Surgery could be considered for active patients who require recovery to the previous level of activity in the shortest possible time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3278660
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Informa Healthcare
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32786602012-02-15 Operative and nonoperative treatment of clavicle fractures in adults: A systematic review of 1,190 patients from the literature Virtanen, Kaisa J Malmivaara, Antti O V Remes, Ville M Paavola, Mika P Acta Orthop Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Traditionally, clavicle fractures have been treated nonoperatively. However, many recent studies have concentrated on the results of operative treatment. We assessed and compared the outcomes of operative and nonoperative treatment for acute clavicle fractures in adults. METHODS: We performed a systematic search of the medical literature from 1966 until the end of March 2011. We included randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials comparing operative and nonoperative treatment and studies comparing different operative and nonoperative treatments. We required that there should be at least 30 adult patients and a follow-up of at least 6 months in each individual trial. We used the GRADE method to assess the quality of evidence. RESULTS: 6 randomized controlled trials (n = 631) and 7 controlled clinical trials (n = 559) were included. There was moderate-quality evidence (i.e. of grade B) (1) that surgery has considerable effectiveness on better function and less disability at short follow-up, (2) of similar risk of relatively mild complications after operative or nonoperative treatment, (3) that delayed union and nonunion were more common in patients who were treated nonoperatively than in those treated operatively, and (4) that the osteosynthesis method had no effect on the incidence of delayed union or nonunion. Only 1 controlled clinical trial was found on lateral clavicle fractures with very limited (grade D) evidence. INTERPRETATION: Patients treated operatively have slightly better function and less disability than those treated nonoperatively at short follow-up, but then the effectiveness diminishes and is weak at 6 months. The different operative techniques may not differ in effectiveness or in adverse effects, but the evidence is very limited or conflicting. Surgery could be considered for active patients who require recovery to the previous level of activity in the shortest possible time. Informa Healthcare 2012-02 2012-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3278660/ /pubmed/22248169 http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.652884 Text en Copyright: © Nordic Orthopaedic Federation http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the source is credited.
spellingShingle Article
Virtanen, Kaisa J
Malmivaara, Antti O V
Remes, Ville M
Paavola, Mika P
Operative and nonoperative treatment of clavicle fractures in adults: A systematic review of 1,190 patients from the literature
title Operative and nonoperative treatment of clavicle fractures in adults: A systematic review of 1,190 patients from the literature
title_full Operative and nonoperative treatment of clavicle fractures in adults: A systematic review of 1,190 patients from the literature
title_fullStr Operative and nonoperative treatment of clavicle fractures in adults: A systematic review of 1,190 patients from the literature
title_full_unstemmed Operative and nonoperative treatment of clavicle fractures in adults: A systematic review of 1,190 patients from the literature
title_short Operative and nonoperative treatment of clavicle fractures in adults: A systematic review of 1,190 patients from the literature
title_sort operative and nonoperative treatment of clavicle fractures in adults: a systematic review of 1,190 patients from the literature
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278660/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22248169
http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.652884
work_keys_str_mv AT virtanenkaisaj operativeandnonoperativetreatmentofclaviclefracturesinadultsasystematicreviewof1190patientsfromtheliterature
AT malmivaaraanttiov operativeandnonoperativetreatmentofclaviclefracturesinadultsasystematicreviewof1190patientsfromtheliterature
AT remesvillem operativeandnonoperativetreatmentofclaviclefracturesinadultsasystematicreviewof1190patientsfromtheliterature
AT paavolamikap operativeandnonoperativetreatmentofclaviclefracturesinadultsasystematicreviewof1190patientsfromtheliterature