Cargando…

Cell cycle phase classification in 3D in vivo microscopy of Drosophila embryogenesis

BACKGROUND: Cell divisions play critical roles in disease and development. The analysis of cell division phenotypes in high content image-based screening and time-lapse microscopy relies on automated nuclear segmentation and classification of cell cycle phases. Automated identification of the cell c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Du, Tie Hua, Puah, Wee Choo, Wasser, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22372955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-S13-S18
_version_ 1782223612419244032
author Du, Tie Hua
Puah, Wee Choo
Wasser, Martin
author_facet Du, Tie Hua
Puah, Wee Choo
Wasser, Martin
author_sort Du, Tie Hua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cell divisions play critical roles in disease and development. The analysis of cell division phenotypes in high content image-based screening and time-lapse microscopy relies on automated nuclear segmentation and classification of cell cycle phases. Automated identification of the cell cycle phase helps biologists quantify the effect of genetic perturbations and drug treatments. Most existing studies have dealt with 2D images of cultured cells. Few, if any, studies have addressed the problem of cell cycle classification in 3D image stacks of intact tissues. RESULTS: We developed a workflow for the automated cell cycle phase classification in 3D time-series image datasets of live Drosophila embryos expressing the chromatin marker histone-GFP. Upon image acquisition by laser scanning confocal microscopy and 3D nuclear segmentation, we extracted 3D intensity, shape and texture features from interphase nuclei and mitotic chromosomes. We trained different classifiers, including support vector machines (SVM) and neural networks, to distinguish between 5 cell cycles phases (Interphase and 4 mitotic phases) and achieved over 90% accuracy. As the different phases occur at different frequencies (58% of samples correspond to interphase), we devised a strategy to improve the identification of classes with low representation. To investigate which features are required for accurate classification, we performed feature reduction and selection. We were able to reduce the feature set from 42 to 9 without affecting classifier performance. We observed a dramatic decrease of classification performance when the training and testing samples were derived from two different developmental stages, the nuclear divisions of the syncytial blastoderm and the cell divisions during gastrulation. Combining samples from both developmental stages produced a more robust and accurate classifier. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that automated cell cycle phase classification, besides 2D images of cultured cells, can also be applied to 3D images of live tissues. We could reduce the initial 3D feature set from 42 to 9 without compromising performance. Robust classifiers of intact animals need to be trained with samples from different developmental stages and cell types. Cell cycle classification in live animals can be used for automated phenotyping and to improve the performance of automated cell tracking.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3278834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32788342012-02-14 Cell cycle phase classification in 3D in vivo microscopy of Drosophila embryogenesis Du, Tie Hua Puah, Wee Choo Wasser, Martin BMC Bioinformatics Proceedings BACKGROUND: Cell divisions play critical roles in disease and development. The analysis of cell division phenotypes in high content image-based screening and time-lapse microscopy relies on automated nuclear segmentation and classification of cell cycle phases. Automated identification of the cell cycle phase helps biologists quantify the effect of genetic perturbations and drug treatments. Most existing studies have dealt with 2D images of cultured cells. Few, if any, studies have addressed the problem of cell cycle classification in 3D image stacks of intact tissues. RESULTS: We developed a workflow for the automated cell cycle phase classification in 3D time-series image datasets of live Drosophila embryos expressing the chromatin marker histone-GFP. Upon image acquisition by laser scanning confocal microscopy and 3D nuclear segmentation, we extracted 3D intensity, shape and texture features from interphase nuclei and mitotic chromosomes. We trained different classifiers, including support vector machines (SVM) and neural networks, to distinguish between 5 cell cycles phases (Interphase and 4 mitotic phases) and achieved over 90% accuracy. As the different phases occur at different frequencies (58% of samples correspond to interphase), we devised a strategy to improve the identification of classes with low representation. To investigate which features are required for accurate classification, we performed feature reduction and selection. We were able to reduce the feature set from 42 to 9 without affecting classifier performance. We observed a dramatic decrease of classification performance when the training and testing samples were derived from two different developmental stages, the nuclear divisions of the syncytial blastoderm and the cell divisions during gastrulation. Combining samples from both developmental stages produced a more robust and accurate classifier. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that automated cell cycle phase classification, besides 2D images of cultured cells, can also be applied to 3D images of live tissues. We could reduce the initial 3D feature set from 42 to 9 without compromising performance. Robust classifiers of intact animals need to be trained with samples from different developmental stages and cell types. Cell cycle classification in live animals can be used for automated phenotyping and to improve the performance of automated cell tracking. BioMed Central 2011-11-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3278834/ /pubmed/22372955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-S13-S18 Text en Copyright ©2011 Du et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Proceedings
Du, Tie Hua
Puah, Wee Choo
Wasser, Martin
Cell cycle phase classification in 3D in vivo microscopy of Drosophila embryogenesis
title Cell cycle phase classification in 3D in vivo microscopy of Drosophila embryogenesis
title_full Cell cycle phase classification in 3D in vivo microscopy of Drosophila embryogenesis
title_fullStr Cell cycle phase classification in 3D in vivo microscopy of Drosophila embryogenesis
title_full_unstemmed Cell cycle phase classification in 3D in vivo microscopy of Drosophila embryogenesis
title_short Cell cycle phase classification in 3D in vivo microscopy of Drosophila embryogenesis
title_sort cell cycle phase classification in 3d in vivo microscopy of drosophila embryogenesis
topic Proceedings
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22372955
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-12-S13-S18
work_keys_str_mv AT dutiehua cellcyclephaseclassificationin3dinvivomicroscopyofdrosophilaembryogenesis
AT puahweechoo cellcyclephaseclassificationin3dinvivomicroscopyofdrosophilaembryogenesis
AT wassermartin cellcyclephaseclassificationin3dinvivomicroscopyofdrosophilaembryogenesis