Cargando…

Empirical Evaluation of Bone Extraction Protocols

The application of high-resolution analytical techniques to characterize ancient bone proteins requires clean, efficient extraction to obtain high quality data. Here, we evaluated many different protocols from the literature on ostrich cortical bone and moa cortical bone to evaluate their yield and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cleland, Timothy P., Voegele, Kristyn, Schweitzer, Mary H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3279360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22348088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031443
_version_ 1782223666727092224
author Cleland, Timothy P.
Voegele, Kristyn
Schweitzer, Mary H.
author_facet Cleland, Timothy P.
Voegele, Kristyn
Schweitzer, Mary H.
author_sort Cleland, Timothy P.
collection PubMed
description The application of high-resolution analytical techniques to characterize ancient bone proteins requires clean, efficient extraction to obtain high quality data. Here, we evaluated many different protocols from the literature on ostrich cortical bone and moa cortical bone to evaluate their yield and relative purity using the identification of antibody-antigen complexes on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and gel electrophoresis. Moa bone provided an ancient comparison for the effectiveness of bone extraction protocols tested on ostrich bone. For the immunological part of this study, we focused on collagen I, osteocalcin, and hemoglobin because collagen and osteocalcin are the most abundant proteins in the mineralized extracellular matrix and hemoglobin is common in the vasculature. Most of these procedures demineralize the bone first, and then the remaining organics are chemically extracted. We found that the use of hydrochloric acid, rather than ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, for demineralization resulted in the cleanest extractions because the acid was easily removed. In contrast, the use of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid resulted in smearing upon electrophoretic separation, possibly indicating these samples were not as pure. The denaturing agents sodium dodecyl sulfate, urea, and guanidine HCl have been used extensively for the solubilization of proteins in non-biomineralized tissue, but only the latter has been used on bone. We show that all three denaturing agents are effective for extracting bone proteins. One additional method tested uses ammonium bicarbonate as a solubilizing buffer that is more appropriate for post-extraction analyses (e.g., proteomics) by removing the need for desalting. We found that both guanidine HCl and ammonium bicarbonate were effective for extracting many bone proteins, resulting in similar electrophoretic patterns. With the increasing use of proteomics, a new generation of scientists are now interested in the study of proteins from not only extant bone but also from ancient bone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3279360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32793602012-02-17 Empirical Evaluation of Bone Extraction Protocols Cleland, Timothy P. Voegele, Kristyn Schweitzer, Mary H. PLoS One Research Article The application of high-resolution analytical techniques to characterize ancient bone proteins requires clean, efficient extraction to obtain high quality data. Here, we evaluated many different protocols from the literature on ostrich cortical bone and moa cortical bone to evaluate their yield and relative purity using the identification of antibody-antigen complexes on enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and gel electrophoresis. Moa bone provided an ancient comparison for the effectiveness of bone extraction protocols tested on ostrich bone. For the immunological part of this study, we focused on collagen I, osteocalcin, and hemoglobin because collagen and osteocalcin are the most abundant proteins in the mineralized extracellular matrix and hemoglobin is common in the vasculature. Most of these procedures demineralize the bone first, and then the remaining organics are chemically extracted. We found that the use of hydrochloric acid, rather than ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, for demineralization resulted in the cleanest extractions because the acid was easily removed. In contrast, the use of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid resulted in smearing upon electrophoretic separation, possibly indicating these samples were not as pure. The denaturing agents sodium dodecyl sulfate, urea, and guanidine HCl have been used extensively for the solubilization of proteins in non-biomineralized tissue, but only the latter has been used on bone. We show that all three denaturing agents are effective for extracting bone proteins. One additional method tested uses ammonium bicarbonate as a solubilizing buffer that is more appropriate for post-extraction analyses (e.g., proteomics) by removing the need for desalting. We found that both guanidine HCl and ammonium bicarbonate were effective for extracting many bone proteins, resulting in similar electrophoretic patterns. With the increasing use of proteomics, a new generation of scientists are now interested in the study of proteins from not only extant bone but also from ancient bone. Public Library of Science 2012-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3279360/ /pubmed/22348088 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031443 Text en Cleland et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cleland, Timothy P.
Voegele, Kristyn
Schweitzer, Mary H.
Empirical Evaluation of Bone Extraction Protocols
title Empirical Evaluation of Bone Extraction Protocols
title_full Empirical Evaluation of Bone Extraction Protocols
title_fullStr Empirical Evaluation of Bone Extraction Protocols
title_full_unstemmed Empirical Evaluation of Bone Extraction Protocols
title_short Empirical Evaluation of Bone Extraction Protocols
title_sort empirical evaluation of bone extraction protocols
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3279360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22348088
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031443
work_keys_str_mv AT clelandtimothyp empiricalevaluationofboneextractionprotocols
AT voegelekristyn empiricalevaluationofboneextractionprotocols
AT schweitzermaryh empiricalevaluationofboneextractionprotocols