Cargando…

Effect of Topical Anaesthetics on Interstitial Colloid Osmotic Pressure in Human Subcutaneous Tissue Sampled by Wick Technique

OBJECTIVES: To measure colloid osmotic pressure in interstitial fluid (COP(i)) from human subcutaneous tissue with the modified wick technique in order to determine influence of topical application of anaesthetics, dry vs. wet wick and implantation time on COP(i). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 50 healthy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guthe, Hans Jørgen Timm, Nedrebø, Torbjørn, Tenstad, Olav, Wiig, Helge, Berg, Ansgar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3279369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22348071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031332
_version_ 1782223668829487104
author Guthe, Hans Jørgen Timm
Nedrebø, Torbjørn
Tenstad, Olav
Wiig, Helge
Berg, Ansgar
author_facet Guthe, Hans Jørgen Timm
Nedrebø, Torbjørn
Tenstad, Olav
Wiig, Helge
Berg, Ansgar
author_sort Guthe, Hans Jørgen Timm
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To measure colloid osmotic pressure in interstitial fluid (COP(i)) from human subcutaneous tissue with the modified wick technique in order to determine influence of topical application of anaesthetics, dry vs. wet wick and implantation time on COP(i). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 50 healthy volunteers interstitial fluid (IF) was collected by subcutaneous implantation of multi-filamentous nylon wicks. Study subjects were allocated to two groups; one for comparing COP(i) obtained from dry and saline soaked wicks, and one for comparing COP(i) from unanaesthetized skin, and skin after application of a eutectic mixture of local anaesthetic (EMLA®, Astra Zeneca) cream. IF was sampled from the skin of the shoulders, and implantation time was 30, 60, 75, 90 and 120 min. Colloid osmotic pressure was measured with a colloid osmometer. Pain assessment during the procedure was compared for EMLA cream and no topical anaesthesia using a visual analogue scale (VAS) in a subgroup of 10 subjects. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between COP(i) obtained from dry compared to wet wicks, except that the values after 75 and 90 min. were somewhat higher for the dry wicks. Topical anaesthesia with EMLA cream did not affect COP(i) values. COP(i) decreased from 30 to 75 min. of implantation (23.2±4.4 mmHg to 19.6±2.9 mmHg, p = 0.008) and subsequently tended to increase until 120 min. EMLA cream resulted in significant lower VAS score for the procedure. CONCLUSION: COP(i) from subcutaneous tissue was easily obtained and fluid harvesting was well tolerated when topical anaesthetic was used. The difference in COP(i) assessed by dry and wet wicks between 75 min. and 90 min. of implantation was in accordance with previous reports. The use of topical analgesia did not influence COP(i) and topical analgesia may make the wick technique more acceptable for subjects who dislike technical procedures, including children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01044979
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3279369
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32793692012-02-17 Effect of Topical Anaesthetics on Interstitial Colloid Osmotic Pressure in Human Subcutaneous Tissue Sampled by Wick Technique Guthe, Hans Jørgen Timm Nedrebø, Torbjørn Tenstad, Olav Wiig, Helge Berg, Ansgar PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To measure colloid osmotic pressure in interstitial fluid (COP(i)) from human subcutaneous tissue with the modified wick technique in order to determine influence of topical application of anaesthetics, dry vs. wet wick and implantation time on COP(i). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In 50 healthy volunteers interstitial fluid (IF) was collected by subcutaneous implantation of multi-filamentous nylon wicks. Study subjects were allocated to two groups; one for comparing COP(i) obtained from dry and saline soaked wicks, and one for comparing COP(i) from unanaesthetized skin, and skin after application of a eutectic mixture of local anaesthetic (EMLA®, Astra Zeneca) cream. IF was sampled from the skin of the shoulders, and implantation time was 30, 60, 75, 90 and 120 min. Colloid osmotic pressure was measured with a colloid osmometer. Pain assessment during the procedure was compared for EMLA cream and no topical anaesthesia using a visual analogue scale (VAS) in a subgroup of 10 subjects. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between COP(i) obtained from dry compared to wet wicks, except that the values after 75 and 90 min. were somewhat higher for the dry wicks. Topical anaesthesia with EMLA cream did not affect COP(i) values. COP(i) decreased from 30 to 75 min. of implantation (23.2±4.4 mmHg to 19.6±2.9 mmHg, p = 0.008) and subsequently tended to increase until 120 min. EMLA cream resulted in significant lower VAS score for the procedure. CONCLUSION: COP(i) from subcutaneous tissue was easily obtained and fluid harvesting was well tolerated when topical anaesthetic was used. The difference in COP(i) assessed by dry and wet wicks between 75 min. and 90 min. of implantation was in accordance with previous reports. The use of topical analgesia did not influence COP(i) and topical analgesia may make the wick technique more acceptable for subjects who dislike technical procedures, including children. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01044979 Public Library of Science 2012-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3279369/ /pubmed/22348071 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031332 Text en Guthe et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Guthe, Hans Jørgen Timm
Nedrebø, Torbjørn
Tenstad, Olav
Wiig, Helge
Berg, Ansgar
Effect of Topical Anaesthetics on Interstitial Colloid Osmotic Pressure in Human Subcutaneous Tissue Sampled by Wick Technique
title Effect of Topical Anaesthetics on Interstitial Colloid Osmotic Pressure in Human Subcutaneous Tissue Sampled by Wick Technique
title_full Effect of Topical Anaesthetics on Interstitial Colloid Osmotic Pressure in Human Subcutaneous Tissue Sampled by Wick Technique
title_fullStr Effect of Topical Anaesthetics on Interstitial Colloid Osmotic Pressure in Human Subcutaneous Tissue Sampled by Wick Technique
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Topical Anaesthetics on Interstitial Colloid Osmotic Pressure in Human Subcutaneous Tissue Sampled by Wick Technique
title_short Effect of Topical Anaesthetics on Interstitial Colloid Osmotic Pressure in Human Subcutaneous Tissue Sampled by Wick Technique
title_sort effect of topical anaesthetics on interstitial colloid osmotic pressure in human subcutaneous tissue sampled by wick technique
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3279369/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22348071
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031332
work_keys_str_mv AT guthehansjørgentimm effectoftopicalanaestheticsoninterstitialcolloidosmoticpressureinhumansubcutaneoustissuesampledbywicktechnique
AT nedrebøtorbjørn effectoftopicalanaestheticsoninterstitialcolloidosmoticpressureinhumansubcutaneoustissuesampledbywicktechnique
AT tenstadolav effectoftopicalanaestheticsoninterstitialcolloidosmoticpressureinhumansubcutaneoustissuesampledbywicktechnique
AT wiighelge effectoftopicalanaestheticsoninterstitialcolloidosmoticpressureinhumansubcutaneoustissuesampledbywicktechnique
AT bergansgar effectoftopicalanaestheticsoninterstitialcolloidosmoticpressureinhumansubcutaneoustissuesampledbywicktechnique