Cargando…

A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers

BACKGROUND: Personalized feedback is a promising self-help for problem gamblers. Such interventions have shown consistently positive results with other addictive behaviours, and our own pilot test of personalized normative feedback materials for gamblers yielded positive findings. The current random...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cunningham, John A., Hodgins, David C., Toneatto, Tony, Murphy, Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3279405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22348112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031586
_version_ 1782223677224386560
author Cunningham, John A.
Hodgins, David C.
Toneatto, Tony
Murphy, Michelle
author_facet Cunningham, John A.
Hodgins, David C.
Toneatto, Tony
Murphy, Michelle
author_sort Cunningham, John A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Personalized feedback is a promising self-help for problem gamblers. Such interventions have shown consistently positive results with other addictive behaviours, and our own pilot test of personalized normative feedback materials for gamblers yielded positive findings. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness, and the sustained efficacy, of the personalized feedback intervention materials for problem gamblers. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Respondents recruited by a general population telephone screener of Ontario adults included gamblers with moderate and severe gambling problems. Those who agreed to participate were randomly assigned to receive: 1) the full personalized normative feedback intervention; 2) a partial feedback that contained all the feedback information provided to those in condition 1 but without the normative feedback content (i.e., no comparisons provided to general population gambling norms); or 3) a waiting list control condition. The primary hypothesis was that problem gamblers who received the personalized normative feedback intervention would reduce their gambling more than problem gamblers who did not receive any intervention (waiting list control condition) by the six-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The study found no evidence for the impact of normative personalized feedback. However, participants who received, the partial feedback (without norms) reduced the number of days they gambled compared to participants who did not receive the intervention. We concluded that personalized feedback interventions were well received and the materials may be helpful at reducing gambling. Realistically, it can be expected that the personalized feedback intervention may have a limited, short term impact on the severity of participants' problem gambling because the intervention is just a brief screener. An Internet-based version of the personalized feedback intervention tool, however, may offer an easy to access and non-threatening portal that can be used to motivate participants to seek further help online or in person. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00578357
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3279405
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32794052012-02-17 A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers Cunningham, John A. Hodgins, David C. Toneatto, Tony Murphy, Michelle PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Personalized feedback is a promising self-help for problem gamblers. Such interventions have shown consistently positive results with other addictive behaviours, and our own pilot test of personalized normative feedback materials for gamblers yielded positive findings. The current randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness, and the sustained efficacy, of the personalized feedback intervention materials for problem gamblers. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Respondents recruited by a general population telephone screener of Ontario adults included gamblers with moderate and severe gambling problems. Those who agreed to participate were randomly assigned to receive: 1) the full personalized normative feedback intervention; 2) a partial feedback that contained all the feedback information provided to those in condition 1 but without the normative feedback content (i.e., no comparisons provided to general population gambling norms); or 3) a waiting list control condition. The primary hypothesis was that problem gamblers who received the personalized normative feedback intervention would reduce their gambling more than problem gamblers who did not receive any intervention (waiting list control condition) by the six-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The study found no evidence for the impact of normative personalized feedback. However, participants who received, the partial feedback (without norms) reduced the number of days they gambled compared to participants who did not receive the intervention. We concluded that personalized feedback interventions were well received and the materials may be helpful at reducing gambling. Realistically, it can be expected that the personalized feedback intervention may have a limited, short term impact on the severity of participants' problem gambling because the intervention is just a brief screener. An Internet-based version of the personalized feedback intervention tool, however, may offer an easy to access and non-threatening portal that can be used to motivate participants to seek further help online or in person. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00578357 Public Library of Science 2012-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3279405/ /pubmed/22348112 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031586 Text en Cunningham et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cunningham, John A.
Hodgins, David C.
Toneatto, Tony
Murphy, Michelle
A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers
title A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers
title_full A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers
title_fullStr A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers
title_full_unstemmed A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers
title_short A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Personalized Feedback Intervention for Problem Gamblers
title_sort randomized controlled trial of a personalized feedback intervention for problem gamblers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3279405/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22348112
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031586
work_keys_str_mv AT cunninghamjohna arandomizedcontrolledtrialofapersonalizedfeedbackinterventionforproblemgamblers
AT hodginsdavidc arandomizedcontrolledtrialofapersonalizedfeedbackinterventionforproblemgamblers
AT toneattotony arandomizedcontrolledtrialofapersonalizedfeedbackinterventionforproblemgamblers
AT murphymichelle arandomizedcontrolledtrialofapersonalizedfeedbackinterventionforproblemgamblers
AT cunninghamjohna randomizedcontrolledtrialofapersonalizedfeedbackinterventionforproblemgamblers
AT hodginsdavidc randomizedcontrolledtrialofapersonalizedfeedbackinterventionforproblemgamblers
AT toneattotony randomizedcontrolledtrialofapersonalizedfeedbackinterventionforproblemgamblers
AT murphymichelle randomizedcontrolledtrialofapersonalizedfeedbackinterventionforproblemgamblers