Cargando…

Evaluation of Confounders in Toxoplasmosis Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Assay

BACKGROUND: The IFA test is one of the most usual methods for detecting anti-Toxoplasma antibodies, although it has not any unique standardization. It seems that the microscopic judgment of results is an important confounder in IFA test. Therefore, we conducted the present study to clarify the role...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saraei, M, Shojaee, S, Esmaeli, AR, Jahani- Hashemi, H, Keshavarz, H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3279858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22347267
_version_ 1782223752211202048
author Saraei, M
Shojaee, S
Esmaeli, AR
Jahani- Hashemi, H
Keshavarz, H
author_facet Saraei, M
Shojaee, S
Esmaeli, AR
Jahani- Hashemi, H
Keshavarz, H
author_sort Saraei, M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The IFA test is one of the most usual methods for detecting anti-Toxoplasma antibodies, although it has not any unique standardization. It seems that the microscopic judgment of results is an important confounder in IFA test. Therefore, we conducted the present study to clarify the role of microscopic observer, and other confounders on the test. METHODS: Eighty sera were collected from patients suspicious to toxoplasmosis for detection IgG anti-T. gondii by this test. Samples were examined against different series of antigens, IgG anti-human conjugates, and observers. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two series of antigens and conjugates. For the observers groups the kappa coefficient of the test results in the experts group (0.97, 0.94–1.00) were significantly higher than the less experienced observers (0.77, 0.68–0.87). CONCLUSION: We recommend the IFA test to be performed only in reference laboratories and by laboratory technicians that have enough experience for this test. Otherwise, we suggest the substitution of this test with other tests like ELISA for the diagnosis and epidemiological studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3279858
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32798582012-02-16 Evaluation of Confounders in Toxoplasmosis Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Assay Saraei, M Shojaee, S Esmaeli, AR Jahani- Hashemi, H Keshavarz, H Iran J Parasitol Original Article BACKGROUND: The IFA test is one of the most usual methods for detecting anti-Toxoplasma antibodies, although it has not any unique standardization. It seems that the microscopic judgment of results is an important confounder in IFA test. Therefore, we conducted the present study to clarify the role of microscopic observer, and other confounders on the test. METHODS: Eighty sera were collected from patients suspicious to toxoplasmosis for detection IgG anti-T. gondii by this test. Samples were examined against different series of antigens, IgG anti-human conjugates, and observers. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two series of antigens and conjugates. For the observers groups the kappa coefficient of the test results in the experts group (0.97, 0.94–1.00) were significantly higher than the less experienced observers (0.77, 0.68–0.87). CONCLUSION: We recommend the IFA test to be performed only in reference laboratories and by laboratory technicians that have enough experience for this test. Otherwise, we suggest the substitution of this test with other tests like ELISA for the diagnosis and epidemiological studies. Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2010-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3279858/ /pubmed/22347267 Text en © 2010 Iranian Society of Parasitology & Tehran University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Saraei, M
Shojaee, S
Esmaeli, AR
Jahani- Hashemi, H
Keshavarz, H
Evaluation of Confounders in Toxoplasmosis Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Assay
title Evaluation of Confounders in Toxoplasmosis Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Assay
title_full Evaluation of Confounders in Toxoplasmosis Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Assay
title_fullStr Evaluation of Confounders in Toxoplasmosis Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Assay
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Confounders in Toxoplasmosis Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Assay
title_short Evaluation of Confounders in Toxoplasmosis Indirect Fluorescent Antibody Assay
title_sort evaluation of confounders in toxoplasmosis indirect fluorescent antibody assay
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3279858/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22347267
work_keys_str_mv AT saraeim evaluationofconfoundersintoxoplasmosisindirectfluorescentantibodyassay
AT shojaees evaluationofconfoundersintoxoplasmosisindirectfluorescentantibodyassay
AT esmaeliar evaluationofconfoundersintoxoplasmosisindirectfluorescentantibodyassay
AT jahanihashemih evaluationofconfoundersintoxoplasmosisindirectfluorescentantibodyassay
AT keshavarzh evaluationofconfoundersintoxoplasmosisindirectfluorescentantibodyassay