Cargando…
Evidence for Two Numerical Systems That Are Similar in Humans and Guppies
BACKGROUND: Humans and non-human animals share an approximate non-verbal system for representing and comparing numerosities that has no upper limit and for which accuracy is dependent on the numerical ratio. Current evidence indicates that the mechanism for keeping track of individual objects can al...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3280231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22355405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031923 |
_version_ | 1782223795677822976 |
---|---|
author | Agrillo, Christian Piffer, Laura Bisazza, Angelo Butterworth, Brian |
author_facet | Agrillo, Christian Piffer, Laura Bisazza, Angelo Butterworth, Brian |
author_sort | Agrillo, Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Humans and non-human animals share an approximate non-verbal system for representing and comparing numerosities that has no upper limit and for which accuracy is dependent on the numerical ratio. Current evidence indicates that the mechanism for keeping track of individual objects can also be used for numerical purposes; if so, its accuracy will be independent of numerical ratio, but its capacity is limited to the number of items that can be tracked, about four. There is, however, growing controversy as to whether two separate number systems are present in other vertebrate species. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In this study, we compared the ability of undergraduate students and guppies to discriminate the same numerical ratios, both within and beyond the small number range. In both students and fish the performance was ratio-independent for the numbers 1–4, while it steadily increased with numerical distance when larger numbers were presented. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results suggest that two distinct systems underlie quantity discrimination in both humans and fish, implying that the building blocks of uniquely human mathematical abilities may be evolutionarily ancient, dating back to before the divergence of bony fish and tetrapod lineages. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3280231 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32802312012-02-21 Evidence for Two Numerical Systems That Are Similar in Humans and Guppies Agrillo, Christian Piffer, Laura Bisazza, Angelo Butterworth, Brian PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Humans and non-human animals share an approximate non-verbal system for representing and comparing numerosities that has no upper limit and for which accuracy is dependent on the numerical ratio. Current evidence indicates that the mechanism for keeping track of individual objects can also be used for numerical purposes; if so, its accuracy will be independent of numerical ratio, but its capacity is limited to the number of items that can be tracked, about four. There is, however, growing controversy as to whether two separate number systems are present in other vertebrate species. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In this study, we compared the ability of undergraduate students and guppies to discriminate the same numerical ratios, both within and beyond the small number range. In both students and fish the performance was ratio-independent for the numbers 1–4, while it steadily increased with numerical distance when larger numbers were presented. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results suggest that two distinct systems underlie quantity discrimination in both humans and fish, implying that the building blocks of uniquely human mathematical abilities may be evolutionarily ancient, dating back to before the divergence of bony fish and tetrapod lineages. Public Library of Science 2012-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3280231/ /pubmed/22355405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031923 Text en Agrillo et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Agrillo, Christian Piffer, Laura Bisazza, Angelo Butterworth, Brian Evidence for Two Numerical Systems That Are Similar in Humans and Guppies |
title | Evidence for Two Numerical Systems That Are Similar in Humans and Guppies |
title_full | Evidence for Two Numerical Systems That Are Similar in Humans and Guppies |
title_fullStr | Evidence for Two Numerical Systems That Are Similar in Humans and Guppies |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence for Two Numerical Systems That Are Similar in Humans and Guppies |
title_short | Evidence for Two Numerical Systems That Are Similar in Humans and Guppies |
title_sort | evidence for two numerical systems that are similar in humans and guppies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3280231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22355405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031923 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT agrillochristian evidencefortwonumericalsystemsthataresimilarinhumansandguppies AT pifferlaura evidencefortwonumericalsystemsthataresimilarinhumansandguppies AT bisazzaangelo evidencefortwonumericalsystemsthataresimilarinhumansandguppies AT butterworthbrian evidencefortwonumericalsystemsthataresimilarinhumansandguppies |