Cargando…

Evidence for Two Numerical Systems That Are Similar in Humans and Guppies

BACKGROUND: Humans and non-human animals share an approximate non-verbal system for representing and comparing numerosities that has no upper limit and for which accuracy is dependent on the numerical ratio. Current evidence indicates that the mechanism for keeping track of individual objects can al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agrillo, Christian, Piffer, Laura, Bisazza, Angelo, Butterworth, Brian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3280231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22355405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031923
_version_ 1782223795677822976
author Agrillo, Christian
Piffer, Laura
Bisazza, Angelo
Butterworth, Brian
author_facet Agrillo, Christian
Piffer, Laura
Bisazza, Angelo
Butterworth, Brian
author_sort Agrillo, Christian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Humans and non-human animals share an approximate non-verbal system for representing and comparing numerosities that has no upper limit and for which accuracy is dependent on the numerical ratio. Current evidence indicates that the mechanism for keeping track of individual objects can also be used for numerical purposes; if so, its accuracy will be independent of numerical ratio, but its capacity is limited to the number of items that can be tracked, about four. There is, however, growing controversy as to whether two separate number systems are present in other vertebrate species. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In this study, we compared the ability of undergraduate students and guppies to discriminate the same numerical ratios, both within and beyond the small number range. In both students and fish the performance was ratio-independent for the numbers 1–4, while it steadily increased with numerical distance when larger numbers were presented. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results suggest that two distinct systems underlie quantity discrimination in both humans and fish, implying that the building blocks of uniquely human mathematical abilities may be evolutionarily ancient, dating back to before the divergence of bony fish and tetrapod lineages.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3280231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32802312012-02-21 Evidence for Two Numerical Systems That Are Similar in Humans and Guppies Agrillo, Christian Piffer, Laura Bisazza, Angelo Butterworth, Brian PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Humans and non-human animals share an approximate non-verbal system for representing and comparing numerosities that has no upper limit and for which accuracy is dependent on the numerical ratio. Current evidence indicates that the mechanism for keeping track of individual objects can also be used for numerical purposes; if so, its accuracy will be independent of numerical ratio, but its capacity is limited to the number of items that can be tracked, about four. There is, however, growing controversy as to whether two separate number systems are present in other vertebrate species. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In this study, we compared the ability of undergraduate students and guppies to discriminate the same numerical ratios, both within and beyond the small number range. In both students and fish the performance was ratio-independent for the numbers 1–4, while it steadily increased with numerical distance when larger numbers were presented. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our results suggest that two distinct systems underlie quantity discrimination in both humans and fish, implying that the building blocks of uniquely human mathematical abilities may be evolutionarily ancient, dating back to before the divergence of bony fish and tetrapod lineages. Public Library of Science 2012-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3280231/ /pubmed/22355405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031923 Text en Agrillo et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Agrillo, Christian
Piffer, Laura
Bisazza, Angelo
Butterworth, Brian
Evidence for Two Numerical Systems That Are Similar in Humans and Guppies
title Evidence for Two Numerical Systems That Are Similar in Humans and Guppies
title_full Evidence for Two Numerical Systems That Are Similar in Humans and Guppies
title_fullStr Evidence for Two Numerical Systems That Are Similar in Humans and Guppies
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for Two Numerical Systems That Are Similar in Humans and Guppies
title_short Evidence for Two Numerical Systems That Are Similar in Humans and Guppies
title_sort evidence for two numerical systems that are similar in humans and guppies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3280231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22355405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0031923
work_keys_str_mv AT agrillochristian evidencefortwonumericalsystemsthataresimilarinhumansandguppies
AT pifferlaura evidencefortwonumericalsystemsthataresimilarinhumansandguppies
AT bisazzaangelo evidencefortwonumericalsystemsthataresimilarinhumansandguppies
AT butterworthbrian evidencefortwonumericalsystemsthataresimilarinhumansandguppies