Cargando…

Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar

Independent component analysis (ICA) and blind source separation (BSS) methods are increasingly used to separate individual brain and non-brain source signals mixed by volume conduction in electroencephalographic (EEG) and other electrophysiological recordings. We compared results of decomposing thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Delorme, Arnaud, Palmer, Jason, Onton, Julie, Oostenveld, Robert, Makeig, Scott
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3280242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22355308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030135
_version_ 1782223798212231168
author Delorme, Arnaud
Palmer, Jason
Onton, Julie
Oostenveld, Robert
Makeig, Scott
author_facet Delorme, Arnaud
Palmer, Jason
Onton, Julie
Oostenveld, Robert
Makeig, Scott
author_sort Delorme, Arnaud
collection PubMed
description Independent component analysis (ICA) and blind source separation (BSS) methods are increasingly used to separate individual brain and non-brain source signals mixed by volume conduction in electroencephalographic (EEG) and other electrophysiological recordings. We compared results of decomposing thirteen 71-channel human scalp EEG datasets by 22 ICA and BSS algorithms, assessing the pairwise mutual information (PMI) in scalp channel pairs, the remaining PMI in component pairs, the overall mutual information reduction (MIR) effected by each decomposition, and decomposition ‘dipolarity’ defined as the number of component scalp maps matching the projection of a single equivalent dipole with less than a given residual variance. The least well-performing algorithm was principal component analysis (PCA); best performing were AMICA and other likelihood/mutual information based ICA methods. Though these and other commonly-used decomposition methods returned many similar components, across 18 ICA/BSS algorithms mean dipolarity varied linearly with both MIR and with PMI remaining between the resulting component time courses, a result compatible with an interpretation of many maximally independent EEG components as being volume-conducted projections of partially-synchronous local cortical field activity within single compact cortical domains. To encourage further method comparisons, the data and software used to prepare the results have been made available (http://sccn.ucsd.edu/wiki/BSSComparison).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3280242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32802422012-02-21 Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar Delorme, Arnaud Palmer, Jason Onton, Julie Oostenveld, Robert Makeig, Scott PLoS One Research Article Independent component analysis (ICA) and blind source separation (BSS) methods are increasingly used to separate individual brain and non-brain source signals mixed by volume conduction in electroencephalographic (EEG) and other electrophysiological recordings. We compared results of decomposing thirteen 71-channel human scalp EEG datasets by 22 ICA and BSS algorithms, assessing the pairwise mutual information (PMI) in scalp channel pairs, the remaining PMI in component pairs, the overall mutual information reduction (MIR) effected by each decomposition, and decomposition ‘dipolarity’ defined as the number of component scalp maps matching the projection of a single equivalent dipole with less than a given residual variance. The least well-performing algorithm was principal component analysis (PCA); best performing were AMICA and other likelihood/mutual information based ICA methods. Though these and other commonly-used decomposition methods returned many similar components, across 18 ICA/BSS algorithms mean dipolarity varied linearly with both MIR and with PMI remaining between the resulting component time courses, a result compatible with an interpretation of many maximally independent EEG components as being volume-conducted projections of partially-synchronous local cortical field activity within single compact cortical domains. To encourage further method comparisons, the data and software used to prepare the results have been made available (http://sccn.ucsd.edu/wiki/BSSComparison). Public Library of Science 2012-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3280242/ /pubmed/22355308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030135 Text en Delorme et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Delorme, Arnaud
Palmer, Jason
Onton, Julie
Oostenveld, Robert
Makeig, Scott
Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar
title Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar
title_full Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar
title_fullStr Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar
title_full_unstemmed Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar
title_short Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar
title_sort independent eeg sources are dipolar
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3280242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22355308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030135
work_keys_str_mv AT delormearnaud independenteegsourcesaredipolar
AT palmerjason independenteegsourcesaredipolar
AT ontonjulie independenteegsourcesaredipolar
AT oostenveldrobert independenteegsourcesaredipolar
AT makeigscott independenteegsourcesaredipolar