Cargando…
Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar
Independent component analysis (ICA) and blind source separation (BSS) methods are increasingly used to separate individual brain and non-brain source signals mixed by volume conduction in electroencephalographic (EEG) and other electrophysiological recordings. We compared results of decomposing thi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3280242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22355308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030135 |
_version_ | 1782223798212231168 |
---|---|
author | Delorme, Arnaud Palmer, Jason Onton, Julie Oostenveld, Robert Makeig, Scott |
author_facet | Delorme, Arnaud Palmer, Jason Onton, Julie Oostenveld, Robert Makeig, Scott |
author_sort | Delorme, Arnaud |
collection | PubMed |
description | Independent component analysis (ICA) and blind source separation (BSS) methods are increasingly used to separate individual brain and non-brain source signals mixed by volume conduction in electroencephalographic (EEG) and other electrophysiological recordings. We compared results of decomposing thirteen 71-channel human scalp EEG datasets by 22 ICA and BSS algorithms, assessing the pairwise mutual information (PMI) in scalp channel pairs, the remaining PMI in component pairs, the overall mutual information reduction (MIR) effected by each decomposition, and decomposition ‘dipolarity’ defined as the number of component scalp maps matching the projection of a single equivalent dipole with less than a given residual variance. The least well-performing algorithm was principal component analysis (PCA); best performing were AMICA and other likelihood/mutual information based ICA methods. Though these and other commonly-used decomposition methods returned many similar components, across 18 ICA/BSS algorithms mean dipolarity varied linearly with both MIR and with PMI remaining between the resulting component time courses, a result compatible with an interpretation of many maximally independent EEG components as being volume-conducted projections of partially-synchronous local cortical field activity within single compact cortical domains. To encourage further method comparisons, the data and software used to prepare the results have been made available (http://sccn.ucsd.edu/wiki/BSSComparison). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3280242 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32802422012-02-21 Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar Delorme, Arnaud Palmer, Jason Onton, Julie Oostenveld, Robert Makeig, Scott PLoS One Research Article Independent component analysis (ICA) and blind source separation (BSS) methods are increasingly used to separate individual brain and non-brain source signals mixed by volume conduction in electroencephalographic (EEG) and other electrophysiological recordings. We compared results of decomposing thirteen 71-channel human scalp EEG datasets by 22 ICA and BSS algorithms, assessing the pairwise mutual information (PMI) in scalp channel pairs, the remaining PMI in component pairs, the overall mutual information reduction (MIR) effected by each decomposition, and decomposition ‘dipolarity’ defined as the number of component scalp maps matching the projection of a single equivalent dipole with less than a given residual variance. The least well-performing algorithm was principal component analysis (PCA); best performing were AMICA and other likelihood/mutual information based ICA methods. Though these and other commonly-used decomposition methods returned many similar components, across 18 ICA/BSS algorithms mean dipolarity varied linearly with both MIR and with PMI remaining between the resulting component time courses, a result compatible with an interpretation of many maximally independent EEG components as being volume-conducted projections of partially-synchronous local cortical field activity within single compact cortical domains. To encourage further method comparisons, the data and software used to prepare the results have been made available (http://sccn.ucsd.edu/wiki/BSSComparison). Public Library of Science 2012-02-15 /pmc/articles/PMC3280242/ /pubmed/22355308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030135 Text en Delorme et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Delorme, Arnaud Palmer, Jason Onton, Julie Oostenveld, Robert Makeig, Scott Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar |
title | Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar |
title_full | Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar |
title_fullStr | Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar |
title_full_unstemmed | Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar |
title_short | Independent EEG Sources Are Dipolar |
title_sort | independent eeg sources are dipolar |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3280242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22355308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030135 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delormearnaud independenteegsourcesaredipolar AT palmerjason independenteegsourcesaredipolar AT ontonjulie independenteegsourcesaredipolar AT oostenveldrobert independenteegsourcesaredipolar AT makeigscott independenteegsourcesaredipolar |