Cargando…
A posteriori error estimates for the Johnson–Nédélec FEM–BEM coupling
Only very recently, Sayas [The validity of Johnson–Nédélec's BEM-FEM coupling on polygonal interfaces. SIAM J Numer Anal 2009;47:3451–63] proved that the Johnson–Nédélec one-equation approach from [On the coupling of boundary integral and finite element methods. Math Comput 1980;35:1063–79] pro...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Computational Mechanics Publications
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3280695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22347772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2011.07.017 |
_version_ | 1782223853168099328 |
---|---|
author | Aurada, M. Feischl, M. Karkulik, M. Praetorius, D. |
author_facet | Aurada, M. Feischl, M. Karkulik, M. Praetorius, D. |
author_sort | Aurada, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Only very recently, Sayas [The validity of Johnson–Nédélec's BEM-FEM coupling on polygonal interfaces. SIAM J Numer Anal 2009;47:3451–63] proved that the Johnson–Nédélec one-equation approach from [On the coupling of boundary integral and finite element methods. Math Comput 1980;35:1063–79] provides a stable coupling of finite element method (FEM) and boundary element method (BEM). In our work, we now adapt the analytical results for different a posteriori error estimates developed for the symmetric FEM–BEM coupling to the Johnson–Nédélec coupling. More precisely, we analyze the weighted-residual error estimator, the two-level error estimator, and different versions of (h−h/2)-based error estimators. In numerical experiments, we use these estimators to steer h-adaptive algorithms, and compare the effectivity of the different approaches. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3280695 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Computational Mechanics Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32806952012-02-16 A posteriori error estimates for the Johnson–Nédélec FEM–BEM coupling Aurada, M. Feischl, M. Karkulik, M. Praetorius, D. Eng Anal Bound Elem Article Only very recently, Sayas [The validity of Johnson–Nédélec's BEM-FEM coupling on polygonal interfaces. SIAM J Numer Anal 2009;47:3451–63] proved that the Johnson–Nédélec one-equation approach from [On the coupling of boundary integral and finite element methods. Math Comput 1980;35:1063–79] provides a stable coupling of finite element method (FEM) and boundary element method (BEM). In our work, we now adapt the analytical results for different a posteriori error estimates developed for the symmetric FEM–BEM coupling to the Johnson–Nédélec coupling. More precisely, we analyze the weighted-residual error estimator, the two-level error estimator, and different versions of (h−h/2)-based error estimators. In numerical experiments, we use these estimators to steer h-adaptive algorithms, and compare the effectivity of the different approaches. Computational Mechanics Publications 2012-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3280695/ /pubmed/22347772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2011.07.017 Text en © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) license |
spellingShingle | Article Aurada, M. Feischl, M. Karkulik, M. Praetorius, D. A posteriori error estimates for the Johnson–Nédélec FEM–BEM coupling |
title | A posteriori error estimates for the Johnson–Nédélec FEM–BEM coupling |
title_full | A posteriori error estimates for the Johnson–Nédélec FEM–BEM coupling |
title_fullStr | A posteriori error estimates for the Johnson–Nédélec FEM–BEM coupling |
title_full_unstemmed | A posteriori error estimates for the Johnson–Nédélec FEM–BEM coupling |
title_short | A posteriori error estimates for the Johnson–Nédélec FEM–BEM coupling |
title_sort | posteriori error estimates for the johnson–nédélec fem–bem coupling |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3280695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22347772 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2011.07.017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT auradam aposteriorierrorestimatesforthejohnsonnedelecfembemcoupling AT feischlm aposteriorierrorestimatesforthejohnsonnedelecfembemcoupling AT karkulikm aposteriorierrorestimatesforthejohnsonnedelecfembemcoupling AT praetoriusd aposteriorierrorestimatesforthejohnsonnedelecfembemcoupling AT auradam posteriorierrorestimatesforthejohnsonnedelecfembemcoupling AT feischlm posteriorierrorestimatesforthejohnsonnedelecfembemcoupling AT karkulikm posteriorierrorestimatesforthejohnsonnedelecfembemcoupling AT praetoriusd posteriorierrorestimatesforthejohnsonnedelecfembemcoupling |