Cargando…

The Kelvin–Helmholtz instability at Venus: What is the unstable boundary?

The Kelvin–Helmholtz instability gained scientific attention after observations at Venus by the spacecraft Pioneer Venus Orbiter gave rise to speculations that the instability contributes to the loss of planetary ions through the formation of plasma clouds. Since then, a handful of studies were devo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Möstl, Ute V., Erkaev, Nikolay V., Zellinger, Michael, Lammer, Helmut, Gröller, Hannes, Biernat, Helfried K., Korovinskiy, Daniil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Press 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3280700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22347723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2011.09.012
_version_ 1782223853400883200
author Möstl, Ute V.
Erkaev, Nikolay V.
Zellinger, Michael
Lammer, Helmut
Gröller, Hannes
Biernat, Helfried K.
Korovinskiy, Daniil
author_facet Möstl, Ute V.
Erkaev, Nikolay V.
Zellinger, Michael
Lammer, Helmut
Gröller, Hannes
Biernat, Helfried K.
Korovinskiy, Daniil
author_sort Möstl, Ute V.
collection PubMed
description The Kelvin–Helmholtz instability gained scientific attention after observations at Venus by the spacecraft Pioneer Venus Orbiter gave rise to speculations that the instability contributes to the loss of planetary ions through the formation of plasma clouds. Since then, a handful of studies were devoted to the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability at the ionopause and its implications for Venus. The aim of this study is to investigate the stability of the two instability-relevant boundary layers around Venus: the induced magnetopause and the ionopause. We solve the 2D magnetohydrodynamic equations with the total variation diminishing Lax–Friedrichs algorithm and perform simulation runs with different initial conditions representing the situation at the boundary layers around Venus. Our results show that the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability does not seem to be able to reach its nonlinear vortex phase at the ionopause due to the very effective stabilizing effect of a large density jump across this boundary layer. This seems also to be true for the induced magnetopause for low solar activity. During high solar activity, however, there could occur conditions at the induced magnetopause which are in favour of the nonlinear evolution of the instability. For this situation, we estimated roughly a growth rate for planetary oxygen ions of about 7.6 × 10(25) s(−1), which should be regarded as an upper limit for loss due to the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3280700
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Academic Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32807002012-02-16 The Kelvin–Helmholtz instability at Venus: What is the unstable boundary? Möstl, Ute V. Erkaev, Nikolay V. Zellinger, Michael Lammer, Helmut Gröller, Hannes Biernat, Helfried K. Korovinskiy, Daniil Icarus Article The Kelvin–Helmholtz instability gained scientific attention after observations at Venus by the spacecraft Pioneer Venus Orbiter gave rise to speculations that the instability contributes to the loss of planetary ions through the formation of plasma clouds. Since then, a handful of studies were devoted to the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability at the ionopause and its implications for Venus. The aim of this study is to investigate the stability of the two instability-relevant boundary layers around Venus: the induced magnetopause and the ionopause. We solve the 2D magnetohydrodynamic equations with the total variation diminishing Lax–Friedrichs algorithm and perform simulation runs with different initial conditions representing the situation at the boundary layers around Venus. Our results show that the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability does not seem to be able to reach its nonlinear vortex phase at the ionopause due to the very effective stabilizing effect of a large density jump across this boundary layer. This seems also to be true for the induced magnetopause for low solar activity. During high solar activity, however, there could occur conditions at the induced magnetopause which are in favour of the nonlinear evolution of the instability. For this situation, we estimated roughly a growth rate for planetary oxygen ions of about 7.6 × 10(25) s(−1), which should be regarded as an upper limit for loss due to the Kelvin–Helmholtz instability. Academic Press 2011-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3280700/ /pubmed/22347723 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2011.09.012 Text en © 2011 Elsevier Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ Open Access under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) license
spellingShingle Article
Möstl, Ute V.
Erkaev, Nikolay V.
Zellinger, Michael
Lammer, Helmut
Gröller, Hannes
Biernat, Helfried K.
Korovinskiy, Daniil
The Kelvin–Helmholtz instability at Venus: What is the unstable boundary?
title The Kelvin–Helmholtz instability at Venus: What is the unstable boundary?
title_full The Kelvin–Helmholtz instability at Venus: What is the unstable boundary?
title_fullStr The Kelvin–Helmholtz instability at Venus: What is the unstable boundary?
title_full_unstemmed The Kelvin–Helmholtz instability at Venus: What is the unstable boundary?
title_short The Kelvin–Helmholtz instability at Venus: What is the unstable boundary?
title_sort kelvin–helmholtz instability at venus: what is the unstable boundary?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3280700/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22347723
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2011.09.012
work_keys_str_mv AT mostlutev thekelvinhelmholtzinstabilityatvenuswhatistheunstableboundary
AT erkaevnikolayv thekelvinhelmholtzinstabilityatvenuswhatistheunstableboundary
AT zellingermichael thekelvinhelmholtzinstabilityatvenuswhatistheunstableboundary
AT lammerhelmut thekelvinhelmholtzinstabilityatvenuswhatistheunstableboundary
AT grollerhannes thekelvinhelmholtzinstabilityatvenuswhatistheunstableboundary
AT biernathelfriedk thekelvinhelmholtzinstabilityatvenuswhatistheunstableboundary
AT korovinskiydaniil thekelvinhelmholtzinstabilityatvenuswhatistheunstableboundary
AT mostlutev kelvinhelmholtzinstabilityatvenuswhatistheunstableboundary
AT erkaevnikolayv kelvinhelmholtzinstabilityatvenuswhatistheunstableboundary
AT zellingermichael kelvinhelmholtzinstabilityatvenuswhatistheunstableboundary
AT lammerhelmut kelvinhelmholtzinstabilityatvenuswhatistheunstableboundary
AT grollerhannes kelvinhelmholtzinstabilityatvenuswhatistheunstableboundary
AT biernathelfriedk kelvinhelmholtzinstabilityatvenuswhatistheunstableboundary
AT korovinskiydaniil kelvinhelmholtzinstabilityatvenuswhatistheunstableboundary