Cargando…

A Localized Coverage Preserving Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks

In a randomly deployed and large scale wireless sensor network, coverage-redundant nodes consume much unnecessary energy. As a result, turning off these redundant nodes can prolong the network lifetime, while maintaining the degree of sensing coverage with a limited number of on-duty nodes. None of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yuheng, Pu, Juhua, Zhang, Shuo, Liu, Yunlu, Xiong, Zhang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3280745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22389599
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s90100281
_version_ 1782223859846479872
author Liu, Yuheng
Pu, Juhua
Zhang, Shuo
Liu, Yunlu
Xiong, Zhang
author_facet Liu, Yuheng
Pu, Juhua
Zhang, Shuo
Liu, Yunlu
Xiong, Zhang
author_sort Liu, Yuheng
collection PubMed
description In a randomly deployed and large scale wireless sensor network, coverage-redundant nodes consume much unnecessary energy. As a result, turning off these redundant nodes can prolong the network lifetime, while maintaining the degree of sensing coverage with a limited number of on-duty nodes. None of the off-duty eligibility rules in the literature, however, are sufficient and necessary conditions for eligible nodes. Hence redundancy or blind points might be incurred. In this paper we propose a complete Eligibility Rule based on Perimeter Coverage (ERPC) for a node to determine its eligibility for sleeping. ERPC has a computational complexity of O(N(2)log(N)), lower than the eligibility rule in the Coverage Control Protocol (CCP), O(N(3)), where N is the number of neighboring nodes. We then present a Coverage Preserving Protocol (CPP) to schedule the work state of eligible nodes. The main advantage of CPP over the Ottawa protocol lies in its ability to configure the network to any specific coverage degree, while the Ottawa protocol does not support different coverage configuration. Moreover, as a localized protocol, CPP has better adaptability to dynamic topologies than centralized protocols. Simulation results indicate that CPP can preserve network coverage with fewer active nodes than the Ottawa protocol. In addition, CPP is capable of identifying all the eligible nodes exactly while the CCP protocol might result in blind points due to error decisions. Quantitative analysis and experiments demonstrate that CPP can extend the network lifetime significantly while maintaining a given coverage degree.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3280745
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32807452012-03-02 A Localized Coverage Preserving Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks Liu, Yuheng Pu, Juhua Zhang, Shuo Liu, Yunlu Xiong, Zhang Sensors (Basel) Article In a randomly deployed and large scale wireless sensor network, coverage-redundant nodes consume much unnecessary energy. As a result, turning off these redundant nodes can prolong the network lifetime, while maintaining the degree of sensing coverage with a limited number of on-duty nodes. None of the off-duty eligibility rules in the literature, however, are sufficient and necessary conditions for eligible nodes. Hence redundancy or blind points might be incurred. In this paper we propose a complete Eligibility Rule based on Perimeter Coverage (ERPC) for a node to determine its eligibility for sleeping. ERPC has a computational complexity of O(N(2)log(N)), lower than the eligibility rule in the Coverage Control Protocol (CCP), O(N(3)), where N is the number of neighboring nodes. We then present a Coverage Preserving Protocol (CPP) to schedule the work state of eligible nodes. The main advantage of CPP over the Ottawa protocol lies in its ability to configure the network to any specific coverage degree, while the Ottawa protocol does not support different coverage configuration. Moreover, as a localized protocol, CPP has better adaptability to dynamic topologies than centralized protocols. Simulation results indicate that CPP can preserve network coverage with fewer active nodes than the Ottawa protocol. In addition, CPP is capable of identifying all the eligible nodes exactly while the CCP protocol might result in blind points due to error decisions. Quantitative analysis and experiments demonstrate that CPP can extend the network lifetime significantly while maintaining a given coverage degree. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2009-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3280745/ /pubmed/22389599 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s90100281 Text en © 2009 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Liu, Yuheng
Pu, Juhua
Zhang, Shuo
Liu, Yunlu
Xiong, Zhang
A Localized Coverage Preserving Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks
title A Localized Coverage Preserving Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks
title_full A Localized Coverage Preserving Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks
title_fullStr A Localized Coverage Preserving Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks
title_full_unstemmed A Localized Coverage Preserving Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks
title_short A Localized Coverage Preserving Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks
title_sort localized coverage preserving protocol for wireless sensor networks
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3280745/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22389599
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s90100281
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyuheng alocalizedcoveragepreservingprotocolforwirelesssensornetworks
AT pujuhua alocalizedcoveragepreservingprotocolforwirelesssensornetworks
AT zhangshuo alocalizedcoveragepreservingprotocolforwirelesssensornetworks
AT liuyunlu alocalizedcoveragepreservingprotocolforwirelesssensornetworks
AT xiongzhang alocalizedcoveragepreservingprotocolforwirelesssensornetworks
AT liuyuheng localizedcoveragepreservingprotocolforwirelesssensornetworks
AT pujuhua localizedcoveragepreservingprotocolforwirelesssensornetworks
AT zhangshuo localizedcoveragepreservingprotocolforwirelesssensornetworks
AT liuyunlu localizedcoveragepreservingprotocolforwirelesssensornetworks
AT xiongzhang localizedcoveragepreservingprotocolforwirelesssensornetworks