Cargando…
Influence of Contact Definitions in Assessment of the Relative Importance of Social Settings in Disease Transmission Risk
BACKGROUND: Realistic models of disease transmission incorporating complex population heterogeneities require input from quantitative population mixing studies. We use contact diaries to assess the relative importance of social settings in respiratory pathogen spread using three measures of person c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3281034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22359553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030893 |
_version_ | 1782223905443807232 |
---|---|
author | Bolton, Kirsty J. McCaw, James M. Forbes, Kristian Nathan, Paula Robins, Garry Pattison, Philippa Nolan, Terry McVernon, Jodie |
author_facet | Bolton, Kirsty J. McCaw, James M. Forbes, Kristian Nathan, Paula Robins, Garry Pattison, Philippa Nolan, Terry McVernon, Jodie |
author_sort | Bolton, Kirsty J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Realistic models of disease transmission incorporating complex population heterogeneities require input from quantitative population mixing studies. We use contact diaries to assess the relative importance of social settings in respiratory pathogen spread using three measures of person contact hours (PCH) as proxies for transmission risk with an aim to inform bipartite network models of respiratory pathogen transmission. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Our survey examines the contact behaviour for a convenience sample of 65 adults, with each encounter classified as occurring in a work, retail, home, social, travel or “other” setting. The diary design allows for extraction of PCH-interaction (cumulative time in face-face conversational or touch interaction with contacts) – analogous to the contact measure used in several existing surveys – as well as PCH-setting (product of time spent in setting and number of people present) and PCH-reach (product of time spent in setting and number of people in close proximity). Heterogeneities in day-dependent distribution of risk across settings are analysed using partitioning and cluster analyses and compared between days and contact measures. Although home is typically the highest-risk setting when PCH measures isolate two-way interactions, its relative importance compared to social and work settings may reduce when adopting a more inclusive contact measure that considers the number and duration of potential exposure events. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneities in location-dependent contact behaviour as measured by contact diary studies depend on the adopted contact definition. We find that contact measures isolating face-face conversational or touch interactions suggest that contact in the home dominates, whereas more inclusive contact measures indicate that home and work settings may be of higher importance. In the absence of definitive knowledge of the contact required to facilitate transmission of various respiratory pathogens, it is important for surveys to consider alternative contact measures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3281034 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32810342012-02-22 Influence of Contact Definitions in Assessment of the Relative Importance of Social Settings in Disease Transmission Risk Bolton, Kirsty J. McCaw, James M. Forbes, Kristian Nathan, Paula Robins, Garry Pattison, Philippa Nolan, Terry McVernon, Jodie PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Realistic models of disease transmission incorporating complex population heterogeneities require input from quantitative population mixing studies. We use contact diaries to assess the relative importance of social settings in respiratory pathogen spread using three measures of person contact hours (PCH) as proxies for transmission risk with an aim to inform bipartite network models of respiratory pathogen transmission. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Our survey examines the contact behaviour for a convenience sample of 65 adults, with each encounter classified as occurring in a work, retail, home, social, travel or “other” setting. The diary design allows for extraction of PCH-interaction (cumulative time in face-face conversational or touch interaction with contacts) – analogous to the contact measure used in several existing surveys – as well as PCH-setting (product of time spent in setting and number of people present) and PCH-reach (product of time spent in setting and number of people in close proximity). Heterogeneities in day-dependent distribution of risk across settings are analysed using partitioning and cluster analyses and compared between days and contact measures. Although home is typically the highest-risk setting when PCH measures isolate two-way interactions, its relative importance compared to social and work settings may reduce when adopting a more inclusive contact measure that considers the number and duration of potential exposure events. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneities in location-dependent contact behaviour as measured by contact diary studies depend on the adopted contact definition. We find that contact measures isolating face-face conversational or touch interactions suggest that contact in the home dominates, whereas more inclusive contact measures indicate that home and work settings may be of higher importance. In the absence of definitive knowledge of the contact required to facilitate transmission of various respiratory pathogens, it is important for surveys to consider alternative contact measures. Public Library of Science 2012-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3281034/ /pubmed/22359553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030893 Text en Bolton et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bolton, Kirsty J. McCaw, James M. Forbes, Kristian Nathan, Paula Robins, Garry Pattison, Philippa Nolan, Terry McVernon, Jodie Influence of Contact Definitions in Assessment of the Relative Importance of Social Settings in Disease Transmission Risk |
title | Influence of Contact Definitions in Assessment of the Relative Importance of Social Settings in Disease Transmission Risk |
title_full | Influence of Contact Definitions in Assessment of the Relative Importance of Social Settings in Disease Transmission Risk |
title_fullStr | Influence of Contact Definitions in Assessment of the Relative Importance of Social Settings in Disease Transmission Risk |
title_full_unstemmed | Influence of Contact Definitions in Assessment of the Relative Importance of Social Settings in Disease Transmission Risk |
title_short | Influence of Contact Definitions in Assessment of the Relative Importance of Social Settings in Disease Transmission Risk |
title_sort | influence of contact definitions in assessment of the relative importance of social settings in disease transmission risk |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3281034/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22359553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030893 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boltonkirstyj influenceofcontactdefinitionsinassessmentoftherelativeimportanceofsocialsettingsindiseasetransmissionrisk AT mccawjamesm influenceofcontactdefinitionsinassessmentoftherelativeimportanceofsocialsettingsindiseasetransmissionrisk AT forbeskristian influenceofcontactdefinitionsinassessmentoftherelativeimportanceofsocialsettingsindiseasetransmissionrisk AT nathanpaula influenceofcontactdefinitionsinassessmentoftherelativeimportanceofsocialsettingsindiseasetransmissionrisk AT robinsgarry influenceofcontactdefinitionsinassessmentoftherelativeimportanceofsocialsettingsindiseasetransmissionrisk AT pattisonphilippa influenceofcontactdefinitionsinassessmentoftherelativeimportanceofsocialsettingsindiseasetransmissionrisk AT nolanterry influenceofcontactdefinitionsinassessmentoftherelativeimportanceofsocialsettingsindiseasetransmissionrisk AT mcvernonjodie influenceofcontactdefinitionsinassessmentoftherelativeimportanceofsocialsettingsindiseasetransmissionrisk |