Cargando…

Influence of Contact Definitions in Assessment of the Relative Importance of Social Settings in Disease Transmission Risk

BACKGROUND: Realistic models of disease transmission incorporating complex population heterogeneities require input from quantitative population mixing studies. We use contact diaries to assess the relative importance of social settings in respiratory pathogen spread using three measures of person c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bolton, Kirsty J., McCaw, James M., Forbes, Kristian, Nathan, Paula, Robins, Garry, Pattison, Philippa, Nolan, Terry, McVernon, Jodie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3281034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22359553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030893
_version_ 1782223905443807232
author Bolton, Kirsty J.
McCaw, James M.
Forbes, Kristian
Nathan, Paula
Robins, Garry
Pattison, Philippa
Nolan, Terry
McVernon, Jodie
author_facet Bolton, Kirsty J.
McCaw, James M.
Forbes, Kristian
Nathan, Paula
Robins, Garry
Pattison, Philippa
Nolan, Terry
McVernon, Jodie
author_sort Bolton, Kirsty J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Realistic models of disease transmission incorporating complex population heterogeneities require input from quantitative population mixing studies. We use contact diaries to assess the relative importance of social settings in respiratory pathogen spread using three measures of person contact hours (PCH) as proxies for transmission risk with an aim to inform bipartite network models of respiratory pathogen transmission. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Our survey examines the contact behaviour for a convenience sample of 65 adults, with each encounter classified as occurring in a work, retail, home, social, travel or “other” setting. The diary design allows for extraction of PCH-interaction (cumulative time in face-face conversational or touch interaction with contacts) – analogous to the contact measure used in several existing surveys – as well as PCH-setting (product of time spent in setting and number of people present) and PCH-reach (product of time spent in setting and number of people in close proximity). Heterogeneities in day-dependent distribution of risk across settings are analysed using partitioning and cluster analyses and compared between days and contact measures. Although home is typically the highest-risk setting when PCH measures isolate two-way interactions, its relative importance compared to social and work settings may reduce when adopting a more inclusive contact measure that considers the number and duration of potential exposure events. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneities in location-dependent contact behaviour as measured by contact diary studies depend on the adopted contact definition. We find that contact measures isolating face-face conversational or touch interactions suggest that contact in the home dominates, whereas more inclusive contact measures indicate that home and work settings may be of higher importance. In the absence of definitive knowledge of the contact required to facilitate transmission of various respiratory pathogens, it is important for surveys to consider alternative contact measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3281034
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32810342012-02-22 Influence of Contact Definitions in Assessment of the Relative Importance of Social Settings in Disease Transmission Risk Bolton, Kirsty J. McCaw, James M. Forbes, Kristian Nathan, Paula Robins, Garry Pattison, Philippa Nolan, Terry McVernon, Jodie PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Realistic models of disease transmission incorporating complex population heterogeneities require input from quantitative population mixing studies. We use contact diaries to assess the relative importance of social settings in respiratory pathogen spread using three measures of person contact hours (PCH) as proxies for transmission risk with an aim to inform bipartite network models of respiratory pathogen transmission. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Our survey examines the contact behaviour for a convenience sample of 65 adults, with each encounter classified as occurring in a work, retail, home, social, travel or “other” setting. The diary design allows for extraction of PCH-interaction (cumulative time in face-face conversational or touch interaction with contacts) – analogous to the contact measure used in several existing surveys – as well as PCH-setting (product of time spent in setting and number of people present) and PCH-reach (product of time spent in setting and number of people in close proximity). Heterogeneities in day-dependent distribution of risk across settings are analysed using partitioning and cluster analyses and compared between days and contact measures. Although home is typically the highest-risk setting when PCH measures isolate two-way interactions, its relative importance compared to social and work settings may reduce when adopting a more inclusive contact measure that considers the number and duration of potential exposure events. CONCLUSIONS: Heterogeneities in location-dependent contact behaviour as measured by contact diary studies depend on the adopted contact definition. We find that contact measures isolating face-face conversational or touch interactions suggest that contact in the home dominates, whereas more inclusive contact measures indicate that home and work settings may be of higher importance. In the absence of definitive knowledge of the contact required to facilitate transmission of various respiratory pathogens, it is important for surveys to consider alternative contact measures. Public Library of Science 2012-02-16 /pmc/articles/PMC3281034/ /pubmed/22359553 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030893 Text en Bolton et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bolton, Kirsty J.
McCaw, James M.
Forbes, Kristian
Nathan, Paula
Robins, Garry
Pattison, Philippa
Nolan, Terry
McVernon, Jodie
Influence of Contact Definitions in Assessment of the Relative Importance of Social Settings in Disease Transmission Risk
title Influence of Contact Definitions in Assessment of the Relative Importance of Social Settings in Disease Transmission Risk
title_full Influence of Contact Definitions in Assessment of the Relative Importance of Social Settings in Disease Transmission Risk
title_fullStr Influence of Contact Definitions in Assessment of the Relative Importance of Social Settings in Disease Transmission Risk
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Contact Definitions in Assessment of the Relative Importance of Social Settings in Disease Transmission Risk
title_short Influence of Contact Definitions in Assessment of the Relative Importance of Social Settings in Disease Transmission Risk
title_sort influence of contact definitions in assessment of the relative importance of social settings in disease transmission risk
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3281034/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22359553
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030893
work_keys_str_mv AT boltonkirstyj influenceofcontactdefinitionsinassessmentoftherelativeimportanceofsocialsettingsindiseasetransmissionrisk
AT mccawjamesm influenceofcontactdefinitionsinassessmentoftherelativeimportanceofsocialsettingsindiseasetransmissionrisk
AT forbeskristian influenceofcontactdefinitionsinassessmentoftherelativeimportanceofsocialsettingsindiseasetransmissionrisk
AT nathanpaula influenceofcontactdefinitionsinassessmentoftherelativeimportanceofsocialsettingsindiseasetransmissionrisk
AT robinsgarry influenceofcontactdefinitionsinassessmentoftherelativeimportanceofsocialsettingsindiseasetransmissionrisk
AT pattisonphilippa influenceofcontactdefinitionsinassessmentoftherelativeimportanceofsocialsettingsindiseasetransmissionrisk
AT nolanterry influenceofcontactdefinitionsinassessmentoftherelativeimportanceofsocialsettingsindiseasetransmissionrisk
AT mcvernonjodie influenceofcontactdefinitionsinassessmentoftherelativeimportanceofsocialsettingsindiseasetransmissionrisk