Cargando…

CD163 versus CD68 in tumor associated macrophages of classical hodgkin lymphoma

Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) is a B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder with a relatively good prognosis. A small but significant percentage of patients, however, will respond poorly to therapy. A recent gene expression profiling study has identified a macrophage signature which has been correlate...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, Jonathan A, Jain, Salvia, Ren, Qinghu, Zarineh, Alirezah, Liu, Cynthia, Ibrahim, Sherif
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3281786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22289504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-7-12
_version_ 1782223988349468672
author Harris, Jonathan A
Jain, Salvia
Ren, Qinghu
Zarineh, Alirezah
Liu, Cynthia
Ibrahim, Sherif
author_facet Harris, Jonathan A
Jain, Salvia
Ren, Qinghu
Zarineh, Alirezah
Liu, Cynthia
Ibrahim, Sherif
author_sort Harris, Jonathan A
collection PubMed
description Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) is a B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder with a relatively good prognosis. A small but significant percentage of patients, however, will respond poorly to therapy. A recent gene expression profiling study has identified a macrophage signature which has been correlated with primary treatment failure, and immunohistochemical tissue microarray for CD68 was shown to reflect the gene signature as a potentially clinically useful marker to predict adverse prognosis. We examined 44 cases of CHL, mostly nodular sclerosis subtype, in which the immunohistochemical stains for the histiocytic markers CD68 and CD163 were performed. The staining intensity was graded for each stain (< 5, 5-25, and > 25 percent of cells positive in the Hodgkin cell (HC) rich nodules) and background staining characteristics were recorded. CD163 staining was lower than CD68 in HC rich nodules, with lower background staining (p 0.03). There was no significant difference between either CD68 or CD163 and disease recurrence in a subset (N = 41) of cases. In conclusion, we demonstrate that CD163 staining is lower than CD68, with less non-specific staining of background inflammatory cells and Hodgkin cells, therefore is a better marker for tumor associated macrophages. However, we did not identify a correlation between staining for CD68 or CD163 and recurrence of disease. VIRTUAL SLIDES: The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/1460518258831620
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3281786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32817862012-02-18 CD163 versus CD68 in tumor associated macrophages of classical hodgkin lymphoma Harris, Jonathan A Jain, Salvia Ren, Qinghu Zarineh, Alirezah Liu, Cynthia Ibrahim, Sherif Diagn Pathol Research Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (CHL) is a B-cell lymphoproliferative disorder with a relatively good prognosis. A small but significant percentage of patients, however, will respond poorly to therapy. A recent gene expression profiling study has identified a macrophage signature which has been correlated with primary treatment failure, and immunohistochemical tissue microarray for CD68 was shown to reflect the gene signature as a potentially clinically useful marker to predict adverse prognosis. We examined 44 cases of CHL, mostly nodular sclerosis subtype, in which the immunohistochemical stains for the histiocytic markers CD68 and CD163 were performed. The staining intensity was graded for each stain (< 5, 5-25, and > 25 percent of cells positive in the Hodgkin cell (HC) rich nodules) and background staining characteristics were recorded. CD163 staining was lower than CD68 in HC rich nodules, with lower background staining (p 0.03). There was no significant difference between either CD68 or CD163 and disease recurrence in a subset (N = 41) of cases. In conclusion, we demonstrate that CD163 staining is lower than CD68, with less non-specific staining of background inflammatory cells and Hodgkin cells, therefore is a better marker for tumor associated macrophages. However, we did not identify a correlation between staining for CD68 or CD163 and recurrence of disease. VIRTUAL SLIDES: The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/1460518258831620 BioMed Central 2012-01-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3281786/ /pubmed/22289504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-7-12 Text en Copyright ©2012 Harris et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Harris, Jonathan A
Jain, Salvia
Ren, Qinghu
Zarineh, Alirezah
Liu, Cynthia
Ibrahim, Sherif
CD163 versus CD68 in tumor associated macrophages of classical hodgkin lymphoma
title CD163 versus CD68 in tumor associated macrophages of classical hodgkin lymphoma
title_full CD163 versus CD68 in tumor associated macrophages of classical hodgkin lymphoma
title_fullStr CD163 versus CD68 in tumor associated macrophages of classical hodgkin lymphoma
title_full_unstemmed CD163 versus CD68 in tumor associated macrophages of classical hodgkin lymphoma
title_short CD163 versus CD68 in tumor associated macrophages of classical hodgkin lymphoma
title_sort cd163 versus cd68 in tumor associated macrophages of classical hodgkin lymphoma
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3281786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22289504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-7-12
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisjonathana cd163versuscd68intumorassociatedmacrophagesofclassicalhodgkinlymphoma
AT jainsalvia cd163versuscd68intumorassociatedmacrophagesofclassicalhodgkinlymphoma
AT renqinghu cd163versuscd68intumorassociatedmacrophagesofclassicalhodgkinlymphoma
AT zarinehalirezah cd163versuscd68intumorassociatedmacrophagesofclassicalhodgkinlymphoma
AT liucynthia cd163versuscd68intumorassociatedmacrophagesofclassicalhodgkinlymphoma
AT ibrahimsherif cd163versuscd68intumorassociatedmacrophagesofclassicalhodgkinlymphoma