Cargando…

Extended scope physiotherapy roles for orthopedic outpatients: an update systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE: This systematic review updates one conducted in 2008 into extended scope practice (ESP) in physiotherapy in orthopedics. METHODS: A comprehensive open-ended search was conducted using electronic library data-bases and Google Scholar to identify any primary study design reporting on physioth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stanhope, Jessica, Grimmer-Somers, Karen, Milanese, Steve, Kumar, Saravana, Morris, Joanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3282584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22359462
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S28891
_version_ 1782224084984135680
author Stanhope, Jessica
Grimmer-Somers, Karen
Milanese, Steve
Kumar, Saravana
Morris, Joanne
author_facet Stanhope, Jessica
Grimmer-Somers, Karen
Milanese, Steve
Kumar, Saravana
Morris, Joanne
author_sort Stanhope, Jessica
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This systematic review updates one conducted in 2008 into extended scope practice (ESP) in physiotherapy in orthopedics. METHODS: A comprehensive open-ended search was conducted using electronic library data-bases and Google Scholar to identify any primary study design reporting on physiotherapists working in ESP roles within orthopedic settings. Studies were allocated to the National Health and Medical Research Council hierarchy of evidence, although only studies in levels I, II, or III_1 were critically appraised using a purpose-built critical appraisal tool. Information was extracted on the country of origin, ESP tasks, relevant training, patient types, health, process, and cost measures. RESULTS: 1071 studies were identified, and twelve were included in the review (including diagnostic and evaluative research). The hierarchy of evidence ranged from II to IV, from which only two diagnostic studies met the criteria for critical appraisal. ESP tasks included injection therapy, removing k-wires, and requesting investigations. The education of ESP physiotherapists varied widely, and included formal and informal training. The positive outcomes of ESP initiatives were reported, in diagnostic ability, reduced costs and waiting times, and improved health outcomes. CONCLUSION: Despite the positive results, the generally low level of evidence and the range of outcome measures reported, constrained clear conclusions regarding the health, process, and cost implications of ESP physiotherapy roles in orthopedic settings. The need for formalized, widely recognized training was highlighted, to give ESP physiotherapy roles credibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3282584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32825842012-02-22 Extended scope physiotherapy roles for orthopedic outpatients: an update systematic review of the literature Stanhope, Jessica Grimmer-Somers, Karen Milanese, Steve Kumar, Saravana Morris, Joanne J Multidiscip Healthc Review PURPOSE: This systematic review updates one conducted in 2008 into extended scope practice (ESP) in physiotherapy in orthopedics. METHODS: A comprehensive open-ended search was conducted using electronic library data-bases and Google Scholar to identify any primary study design reporting on physiotherapists working in ESP roles within orthopedic settings. Studies were allocated to the National Health and Medical Research Council hierarchy of evidence, although only studies in levels I, II, or III_1 were critically appraised using a purpose-built critical appraisal tool. Information was extracted on the country of origin, ESP tasks, relevant training, patient types, health, process, and cost measures. RESULTS: 1071 studies were identified, and twelve were included in the review (including diagnostic and evaluative research). The hierarchy of evidence ranged from II to IV, from which only two diagnostic studies met the criteria for critical appraisal. ESP tasks included injection therapy, removing k-wires, and requesting investigations. The education of ESP physiotherapists varied widely, and included formal and informal training. The positive outcomes of ESP initiatives were reported, in diagnostic ability, reduced costs and waiting times, and improved health outcomes. CONCLUSION: Despite the positive results, the generally low level of evidence and the range of outcome measures reported, constrained clear conclusions regarding the health, process, and cost implications of ESP physiotherapy roles in orthopedic settings. The need for formalized, widely recognized training was highlighted, to give ESP physiotherapy roles credibility. Dove Medical Press 2012-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3282584/ /pubmed/22359462 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S28891 Text en © 2012 Stanhope et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Stanhope, Jessica
Grimmer-Somers, Karen
Milanese, Steve
Kumar, Saravana
Morris, Joanne
Extended scope physiotherapy roles for orthopedic outpatients: an update systematic review of the literature
title Extended scope physiotherapy roles for orthopedic outpatients: an update systematic review of the literature
title_full Extended scope physiotherapy roles for orthopedic outpatients: an update systematic review of the literature
title_fullStr Extended scope physiotherapy roles for orthopedic outpatients: an update systematic review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Extended scope physiotherapy roles for orthopedic outpatients: an update systematic review of the literature
title_short Extended scope physiotherapy roles for orthopedic outpatients: an update systematic review of the literature
title_sort extended scope physiotherapy roles for orthopedic outpatients: an update systematic review of the literature
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3282584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22359462
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S28891
work_keys_str_mv AT stanhopejessica extendedscopephysiotherapyrolesfororthopedicoutpatientsanupdatesystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT grimmersomerskaren extendedscopephysiotherapyrolesfororthopedicoutpatientsanupdatesystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT milanesesteve extendedscopephysiotherapyrolesfororthopedicoutpatientsanupdatesystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT kumarsaravana extendedscopephysiotherapyrolesfororthopedicoutpatientsanupdatesystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT morrisjoanne extendedscopephysiotherapyrolesfororthopedicoutpatientsanupdatesystematicreviewoftheliterature