Cargando…
Maintaining Live Discussion in Two-Stage Open Peer Review
Open peer review has been proposed for a number of reasons, in particular, for increasing the transparency of the article selection process for a journal, and for obtaining a broader basis for feedback to the authors and for the acceptance decision. The review discussion may also in itself have a va...
Autor principal: | Sandewall, Erik |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Research Foundation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3282940/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22363282 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2012.00009 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The evaluation of research papers in the XXI century. The Open Peer Discussion system of the World Economics Association
por: Ietto-Gillies, Grazia
Publicado: (2012) -
Multi-Stage Open Peer Review: Scientific Evaluation Integrating the Strengths of Traditional Peer Review with the Virtues of Transparency and Self-Regulation
por: Pöschl, Ulrich
Publicado: (2012) -
Open Peer Review by a Selected-Papers Network
por: Lee, Christopher
Publicado: (2012) -
Post-Publication Peer Review: Opening Up Scientific Conversation
por: Hunter, Jane
Publicado: (2012) -
Open Evaluation: A Vision for Entirely Transparent Post-Publication Peer Review and Rating for Science
por: Kriegeskorte, Nikolaus
Publicado: (2012)