Cargando…

Comparison of mild ovarian stimulation with conventional ovarian stimulation in poor responders

OBJECTIVE: To compare the IVF outcomes of mild ovarian stimulation with conventional ovarian stimulation in poor responders. METHODS: From 2004 to 2009, 389 IVF cycles in 285 women showed poor responses (defined as either a basal FSH level ≥12 mIU/mL, or the number of retrieved oocytes ≤3, or serum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Yoo, Ji Hee, Cha, Sun Hwa, Park, Chan Woo, Kim, Jin Young, Yang, Kwang Moon, Song, In Ok, Koong, Mi Kyoung, Kang, Inn Soo, Kim, Hye Ok
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	The Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine 2011
Materias:	Original Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3283064/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22384436 http://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2011.38.3.159

Ejemplares similares

Serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels as a predictor of the ovarian response and IVF outcomes
por: Choi, Min Hye, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Serum anti-Müllerian hormone is a better predictor of ovarian response than FSH and age in IVF patients with endometriosis
por: Yoo, Ji Hee, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Ovarian stimulation modalities in poor responders
por: ÖZKAN, Zehra Sema
Publicado: (2019)

Luteal phase ovarian stimulation for poor ovarian responders
por: Zhang, Wei, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

A high response to controlled ovarian stimulation induces premature luteinization with a negative impact on pregnancy outcomes in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycle
por: Koo, Hwa Seon, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Comparative analyses in transcriptome of human granulosa cells and follicular fluid micro-environment between poor ovarian responders with conventional controlled ovarian or mild ovarian stimulations
por: Liu, Xiaoping, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Pregnancy Outcomes in Double Stimulation versus Two Consecutive Mild Stimulations for IVF in Poor Ovarian Responders
por: Li, Jingzhe, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Mild versus conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF in poor, normal and hyper-responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Datta, Adrija Kumar, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Comparative Effectiveness of Mild or Conventional GnRH-Antagonist Protocols for Ovarian Stimulation in Poor Responders (Poseidon Group 4)
por: Le, Hoang, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Age specific serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels in 1,298 Korean women with regular menstruation
por: Yoo, Ji Hee, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

The BISTIM study: a randomized controlled trial comparing dual ovarian stimulation (duostim) with two conventional ovarian stimulations in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF
por: Massin, N, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The effectiveness of earlier oocyte retrieval in the case of a premature luteinizing hormone surge on hCG day in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles
por: Choi, Min Hye, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Individualized controlled ovarian stimulation in expected poor-responders: an update
por: Haahr, Thor, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Comparison of assisted reproductive technology outcomes in infertile women with polycystic ovary syndrome: In vitro maturation, GnRH agonist, and GnRH antagonist cycles
por: Choi, Min Hye, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Adverse pregnancy outcomes with assisted reproductive technology in non-obese women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a case-control study
por: Han, Ae Ra, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Effectiveness of corifollitropin alfa used for ovarian stimulation of poor responder patients
por: Selman, Helmy, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

What Is the Best Regimen for Ovarian Stimulation of Poor Responders in ART/IVF?
por: Blumenfeld, Zeev
Publicado: (2020)

Comparison of pregnancy outcome after letrozole versus clomiphene treatment for mild ovarian stimulation protocol in poor responders
por: Eftekhar, Maryam, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Fresh and cumulative live birth rates in mild versus conventional stimulation for IVF cycles in poor ovarian responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
por: Montoya-Botero, Pedro, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Can high serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels predict the phenotypes of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and metabolic disturbances in PCOS patients?
por: Hwang, Yu Im, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Laparoscopic management of early primary peritoneal pregnancy: a case report
por: Koo, Hwa Seon, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Comparison Pregnancy Outcomes Between Minimal Stimulation Protocol and Conventional GnRH Antagonist Protocols in Poor Ovarian Responders
por: Pilehvari, Shamim, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Outcomes of Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation/In Vitro Fertilization for Infertile Patients with Borderline Ovarian Tumor after Conservative Treatment
por: Park, Chan Woo, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Luteal phase ovarian stimulation following oocyte retrieval: is it helpful for poor responders?
por: Zhang, John
Publicado: (2015)

Double or dual stimulation in poor ovarian responders: where do we stand?
por: Polat, Mehtap, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Human placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells stimulate ovarian function via miR-145 and bone morphogenetic protein signaling in aged rats
por: Kim, Kyeoung-Hwa, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The likelihood of achieving pregnancy through timed coitus in young infertile women with decreased ovarian reserve
por: Koo, Hwa Seon, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Minimal Ovarian Stimulation in-vitro Fertilization versus Conventional Ovarian Stimulation in Poor Responders: Economic Evaluation Alongside a Propensity Score Adjusted Prospective Observational Study
por: de Souza, Tatiane Oliveira, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

ANDRO-IVF: a novel protocol for poor responders to IVF controlled ovarian stimulation
por: Bercaire, Ludmila, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Co-Administration of Clomiphene Citrate and Letrozole in Mild Ovarian Stimulation Versus Conventional Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Among POSEIDON Group 4 Patients
por: Lin, Hsin-Ta, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Predictive value of sperm motility characteristics assessed by computer-assisted sperm analysis in intrauterine insemination with superovulation in couples with unexplained infertility
por: Youn, Joung Sub, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocol with or without clomiphene citrate for poor ovarian responders: a retrospective cohort study
por: Liu, Ahui, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Luteal phase stimulation versus follicular phase stimulation in poor ovarian responders: results of a randomized controlled trial
por: Llácer, Joaquín, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Embryo Banking with Mild Ovarian Stimulation for IVF: An Alternative Strategy for Poor Prognosis Patients
por: Sini, Ivan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Live Birth Rates in Poor Responders’ Group after Previous Treatment with Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma and Low Dose Ovarian Stimulation Compared with Poor Responders Used Only Low Dose Ovarian Stimulation Before in Vitro Fertilization
por: Stojkovska, Snezhana, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

LH supplementation of ovarian stimulation protocols influences follicular fluid steroid composition contributing to the improvement of ovarian response in poor responder women
por: Marchiani, S., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cumulative live birth rate in mild versus conventional stimulation in progestin-primed ovarian stimulation protocols for individuals with low prognosis
por: Zhang, Junwei, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Treatment modalities for poor ovarian responders
por: Di Guardo, Federica, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Mild ovarian stimulation for IVF is the smartest way forward
por: Nargund, G., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

The best execution of the DuoStim strategy (double stimulation in the follicular and luteal phase of the same ovarian cycle) in patients who are poor ovarian responders
por: Luo, Yanqun, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_tp00qheh6v24s4nrj7m7qrl7p4