Cargando…

Use of combined maximum and minimum intensity projections to determine internal target volume in 4-dimensional CT scans for hepatic malignancies

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the accuracy of the combined maximum and minimum intensity projection-based internal target volume (ITV) delineation in 4-dimensional (4D) CT scans for liver malignancies. METHODS: 4D CT with synchronized IV contrast data were acquired from 15 liver cancer patients (4 hepatoc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Jin, Wang, Jia-Zhou, Zhao, Jian-Dong, Xu, Zhi-Yong, Jiang, Guo-Liang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3283494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22284745
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-11
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: To evaluate the accuracy of the combined maximum and minimum intensity projection-based internal target volume (ITV) delineation in 4-dimensional (4D) CT scans for liver malignancies. METHODS: 4D CT with synchronized IV contrast data were acquired from 15 liver cancer patients (4 hepatocellular carcinomas; 11 hepatic metastases). We used five approaches to determine ITVs: (1). ITV(AllPhases): contouring gross tumor volume (GTV) on each of 10 respiratory phases of 4D CT data set and combining these GTVs; (2). ITV(2Phase): contouring GTV on CT of the peak inhale phase (0% phase) and the peak exhale phase (50%) and then combining the two; (3). ITV(MIP): contouring GTV on MIP with modifications based on physician's visual verification of contours in each respiratory phase; (4). ITV(MinIP): contouring GTV on MinIP with modification by physician; (5). ITV(2M): combining ITV(MIP )and ITV(MinIP). ITV(AllPhases )was taken as the reference ITV, and the metrics used for comparison were: matching index (MI), under- and over-estimated volume (V(under )and V(over)). RESULTS: 4D CT images were successfully acquired from 15 patients and tumor margins were clearly discernable in all patients. There were 9 cases of low density and 6, mixed on CT images. After comparisons of metrics, the tool of ITV(2M )was the most appropriate to contour ITV for liver malignancies with the highest MI of 0.93 ± 0.04 and the lowest proportion of V(under )(0.07 ± 0.04). Moreover, tumor volume, target motion three-dimensionally and ratio of tumor vertical diameter over tumor motion magnitude in cranio-caudal direction did not significantly influence the values of MI and proportion of V(under). CONCLUSION: The tool of ITV(2M )is recommended as a reliable method for generating ITVs from 4D CT data sets in liver cancer.