Cargando…
Interdisciplinary Critique of Sipuleucel-T as Immunotherapy in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Sipuleucel-T was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration on April 29, 2010, as an immunotherapy for late-stage prostate cancer. To manufacture sipuleucel-T, mononuclear cells harvested from the patient are incubated with a recombinant prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) antigen and reinfused. T...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3283534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22232132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr514 |
_version_ | 1782224205981417472 |
---|---|
author | Huber, Marie L. Haynes, Laura Parker, Chris Iversen, Peter |
author_facet | Huber, Marie L. Haynes, Laura Parker, Chris Iversen, Peter |
author_sort | Huber, Marie L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sipuleucel-T was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration on April 29, 2010, as an immunotherapy for late-stage prostate cancer. To manufacture sipuleucel-T, mononuclear cells harvested from the patient are incubated with a recombinant prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) antigen and reinfused. The manufacturer proposes that antigen-presenting cells exogenously activated by PAP induce endogenous T-cells to attack PAP-bearing prostate cancer cells. However, the lack of demonstrable tumor responses has prompted calls for scrutiny of the design of the trials in which sipuleucel-T demonstrated a 4-month survival benefit. Previously unpublished data from the sipuleucel-T trials show worse overall survival in older vs younger patients in the placebo groups, which have not been shown previously to be prognostic for survival in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Because two-thirds of the cells harvested from placebo patients, but not from the sipuleucel-T arm, were frozen and not reinfused, a detrimental effect of this large repeated cell loss provides a potential alternative explanation for the survival “benefit.” Patient safety depends on adequately addressing this alternative explanation for the trial results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3283534 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32835342012-02-22 Interdisciplinary Critique of Sipuleucel-T as Immunotherapy in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Huber, Marie L. Haynes, Laura Parker, Chris Iversen, Peter J Natl Cancer Inst Commentary Sipuleucel-T was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration on April 29, 2010, as an immunotherapy for late-stage prostate cancer. To manufacture sipuleucel-T, mononuclear cells harvested from the patient are incubated with a recombinant prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) antigen and reinfused. The manufacturer proposes that antigen-presenting cells exogenously activated by PAP induce endogenous T-cells to attack PAP-bearing prostate cancer cells. However, the lack of demonstrable tumor responses has prompted calls for scrutiny of the design of the trials in which sipuleucel-T demonstrated a 4-month survival benefit. Previously unpublished data from the sipuleucel-T trials show worse overall survival in older vs younger patients in the placebo groups, which have not been shown previously to be prognostic for survival in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Because two-thirds of the cells harvested from placebo patients, but not from the sipuleucel-T arm, were frozen and not reinfused, a detrimental effect of this large repeated cell loss provides a potential alternative explanation for the survival “benefit.” Patient safety depends on adequately addressing this alternative explanation for the trial results. Oxford University Press 2012-02-22 2012-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3283534/ /pubmed/22232132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr514 Text en © The Author(s) 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Commentary Huber, Marie L. Haynes, Laura Parker, Chris Iversen, Peter Interdisciplinary Critique of Sipuleucel-T as Immunotherapy in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer |
title | Interdisciplinary Critique of Sipuleucel-T as Immunotherapy in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer |
title_full | Interdisciplinary Critique of Sipuleucel-T as Immunotherapy in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer |
title_fullStr | Interdisciplinary Critique of Sipuleucel-T as Immunotherapy in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Interdisciplinary Critique of Sipuleucel-T as Immunotherapy in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer |
title_short | Interdisciplinary Critique of Sipuleucel-T as Immunotherapy in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer |
title_sort | interdisciplinary critique of sipuleucel-t as immunotherapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer |
topic | Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3283534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22232132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr514 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hubermariel interdisciplinarycritiqueofsipuleuceltasimmunotherapyincastrationresistantprostatecancer AT hayneslaura interdisciplinarycritiqueofsipuleuceltasimmunotherapyincastrationresistantprostatecancer AT parkerchris interdisciplinarycritiqueofsipuleuceltasimmunotherapyincastrationresistantprostatecancer AT iversenpeter interdisciplinarycritiqueofsipuleuceltasimmunotherapyincastrationresistantprostatecancer |