Cargando…

Interdisciplinary Critique of Sipuleucel-T as Immunotherapy in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Sipuleucel-T was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration on April 29, 2010, as an immunotherapy for late-stage prostate cancer. To manufacture sipuleucel-T, mononuclear cells harvested from the patient are incubated with a recombinant prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) antigen and reinfused. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huber, Marie L., Haynes, Laura, Parker, Chris, Iversen, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3283534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22232132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr514
_version_ 1782224205981417472
author Huber, Marie L.
Haynes, Laura
Parker, Chris
Iversen, Peter
author_facet Huber, Marie L.
Haynes, Laura
Parker, Chris
Iversen, Peter
author_sort Huber, Marie L.
collection PubMed
description Sipuleucel-T was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration on April 29, 2010, as an immunotherapy for late-stage prostate cancer. To manufacture sipuleucel-T, mononuclear cells harvested from the patient are incubated with a recombinant prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) antigen and reinfused. The manufacturer proposes that antigen-presenting cells exogenously activated by PAP induce endogenous T-cells to attack PAP-bearing prostate cancer cells. However, the lack of demonstrable tumor responses has prompted calls for scrutiny of the design of the trials in which sipuleucel-T demonstrated a 4-month survival benefit. Previously unpublished data from the sipuleucel-T trials show worse overall survival in older vs younger patients in the placebo groups, which have not been shown previously to be prognostic for survival in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Because two-thirds of the cells harvested from placebo patients, but not from the sipuleucel-T arm, were frozen and not reinfused, a detrimental effect of this large repeated cell loss provides a potential alternative explanation for the survival “benefit.” Patient safety depends on adequately addressing this alternative explanation for the trial results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3283534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32835342012-02-22 Interdisciplinary Critique of Sipuleucel-T as Immunotherapy in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Huber, Marie L. Haynes, Laura Parker, Chris Iversen, Peter J Natl Cancer Inst Commentary Sipuleucel-T was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration on April 29, 2010, as an immunotherapy for late-stage prostate cancer. To manufacture sipuleucel-T, mononuclear cells harvested from the patient are incubated with a recombinant prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) antigen and reinfused. The manufacturer proposes that antigen-presenting cells exogenously activated by PAP induce endogenous T-cells to attack PAP-bearing prostate cancer cells. However, the lack of demonstrable tumor responses has prompted calls for scrutiny of the design of the trials in which sipuleucel-T demonstrated a 4-month survival benefit. Previously unpublished data from the sipuleucel-T trials show worse overall survival in older vs younger patients in the placebo groups, which have not been shown previously to be prognostic for survival in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients receiving chemotherapy. Because two-thirds of the cells harvested from placebo patients, but not from the sipuleucel-T arm, were frozen and not reinfused, a detrimental effect of this large repeated cell loss provides a potential alternative explanation for the survival “benefit.” Patient safety depends on adequately addressing this alternative explanation for the trial results. Oxford University Press 2012-02-22 2012-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3283534/ /pubmed/22232132 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr514 Text en © The Author(s) 2012. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Huber, Marie L.
Haynes, Laura
Parker, Chris
Iversen, Peter
Interdisciplinary Critique of Sipuleucel-T as Immunotherapy in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
title Interdisciplinary Critique of Sipuleucel-T as Immunotherapy in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
title_full Interdisciplinary Critique of Sipuleucel-T as Immunotherapy in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
title_fullStr Interdisciplinary Critique of Sipuleucel-T as Immunotherapy in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Interdisciplinary Critique of Sipuleucel-T as Immunotherapy in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
title_short Interdisciplinary Critique of Sipuleucel-T as Immunotherapy in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
title_sort interdisciplinary critique of sipuleucel-t as immunotherapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3283534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22232132
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djr514
work_keys_str_mv AT hubermariel interdisciplinarycritiqueofsipuleuceltasimmunotherapyincastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT hayneslaura interdisciplinarycritiqueofsipuleuceltasimmunotherapyincastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT parkerchris interdisciplinarycritiqueofsipuleuceltasimmunotherapyincastrationresistantprostatecancer
AT iversenpeter interdisciplinarycritiqueofsipuleuceltasimmunotherapyincastrationresistantprostatecancer