Cargando…
Comparative evaluation of a bioabsorbable collagen membrane and connective tissue graft in the treatment of localized gingival recession: A clinical study
BACKGROUND: Gingival recession (GR) can result in root sensitivity, esthetic concern to the patient, and predilection to root caries. The purpose of this randomized clinical study was to evaluate (1) the effect of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) procedure using a bioabsorbable collagen membrane, in...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3283932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22368359 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.92569 |
_version_ | 1782224280754323456 |
---|---|
author | Babu, Harsha Mysore Gujjari, Sheela Kumar Prasad, Deepak Sehgal, Praveen Kumar Srinivasan, Aishwarya |
author_facet | Babu, Harsha Mysore Gujjari, Sheela Kumar Prasad, Deepak Sehgal, Praveen Kumar Srinivasan, Aishwarya |
author_sort | Babu, Harsha Mysore |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gingival recession (GR) can result in root sensitivity, esthetic concern to the patient, and predilection to root caries. The purpose of this randomized clinical study was to evaluate (1) the effect of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) procedure using a bioabsorbable collagen membrane, in comparison to autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) for root coverage in localized gingival recession defects; and (2) the change in width of keratinized gingiva following these two procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 10 cases, showing at least two localized Miller's Class I or Class II gingival recession, participated in this study. In a split mouth design, the pairs of defects were randomly assigned for treatment with either SCTG (SCTG Group) or GTR-based collagen membrane (GTRC Group). Both the grafts were covered with coronally advanced flap. Recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), width of keratinized gingiva (KG), probing depth (PD), relative attachment level (RAL), plaque index (PI), and gingival index (GI) were recorded at baseline, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Six months following root coverage procedures, the mean root coverage was found to be 84.84% ± 16.81% and 84.0% ± 15.19% in SCTG Group and GTRC Group, respectively. The mean keratinized gingival width increase was 1.50 ± 0.70 mm and 2.30 ± 0.67 mm in the SCTG and GTRC group, respectively, which was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: It may be concluded that resorbable collagen membrane can be a reliable alternative to autogenous connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recession. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3283932 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32839322012-02-24 Comparative evaluation of a bioabsorbable collagen membrane and connective tissue graft in the treatment of localized gingival recession: A clinical study Babu, Harsha Mysore Gujjari, Sheela Kumar Prasad, Deepak Sehgal, Praveen Kumar Srinivasan, Aishwarya J Indian Soc Periodontol Original Article BACKGROUND: Gingival recession (GR) can result in root sensitivity, esthetic concern to the patient, and predilection to root caries. The purpose of this randomized clinical study was to evaluate (1) the effect of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) procedure using a bioabsorbable collagen membrane, in comparison to autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) for root coverage in localized gingival recession defects; and (2) the change in width of keratinized gingiva following these two procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 10 cases, showing at least two localized Miller's Class I or Class II gingival recession, participated in this study. In a split mouth design, the pairs of defects were randomly assigned for treatment with either SCTG (SCTG Group) or GTR-based collagen membrane (GTRC Group). Both the grafts were covered with coronally advanced flap. Recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), width of keratinized gingiva (KG), probing depth (PD), relative attachment level (RAL), plaque index (PI), and gingival index (GI) were recorded at baseline, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Six months following root coverage procedures, the mean root coverage was found to be 84.84% ± 16.81% and 84.0% ± 15.19% in SCTG Group and GTRC Group, respectively. The mean keratinized gingival width increase was 1.50 ± 0.70 mm and 2.30 ± 0.67 mm in the SCTG and GTRC group, respectively, which was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: It may be concluded that resorbable collagen membrane can be a reliable alternative to autogenous connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recession. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3283932/ /pubmed/22368359 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.92569 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Babu, Harsha Mysore Gujjari, Sheela Kumar Prasad, Deepak Sehgal, Praveen Kumar Srinivasan, Aishwarya Comparative evaluation of a bioabsorbable collagen membrane and connective tissue graft in the treatment of localized gingival recession: A clinical study |
title | Comparative evaluation of a bioabsorbable collagen membrane and connective tissue graft in the treatment of localized gingival recession: A clinical study |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of a bioabsorbable collagen membrane and connective tissue graft in the treatment of localized gingival recession: A clinical study |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of a bioabsorbable collagen membrane and connective tissue graft in the treatment of localized gingival recession: A clinical study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of a bioabsorbable collagen membrane and connective tissue graft in the treatment of localized gingival recession: A clinical study |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of a bioabsorbable collagen membrane and connective tissue graft in the treatment of localized gingival recession: A clinical study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of a bioabsorbable collagen membrane and connective tissue graft in the treatment of localized gingival recession: a clinical study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3283932/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22368359 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.92569 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT babuharshamysore comparativeevaluationofabioabsorbablecollagenmembraneandconnectivetissuegraftinthetreatmentoflocalizedgingivalrecessionaclinicalstudy AT gujjarisheelakumar comparativeevaluationofabioabsorbablecollagenmembraneandconnectivetissuegraftinthetreatmentoflocalizedgingivalrecessionaclinicalstudy AT prasaddeepak comparativeevaluationofabioabsorbablecollagenmembraneandconnectivetissuegraftinthetreatmentoflocalizedgingivalrecessionaclinicalstudy AT sehgalpraveenkumar comparativeevaluationofabioabsorbablecollagenmembraneandconnectivetissuegraftinthetreatmentoflocalizedgingivalrecessionaclinicalstudy AT srinivasanaishwarya comparativeevaluationofabioabsorbablecollagenmembraneandconnectivetissuegraftinthetreatmentoflocalizedgingivalrecessionaclinicalstudy |