Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of a bioabsorbable collagen membrane and connective tissue graft in the treatment of localized gingival recession: A clinical study

BACKGROUND: Gingival recession (GR) can result in root sensitivity, esthetic concern to the patient, and predilection to root caries. The purpose of this randomized clinical study was to evaluate (1) the effect of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) procedure using a bioabsorbable collagen membrane, in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Babu, Harsha Mysore, Gujjari, Sheela Kumar, Prasad, Deepak, Sehgal, Praveen Kumar, Srinivasan, Aishwarya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3283932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22368359
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.92569
_version_ 1782224280754323456
author Babu, Harsha Mysore
Gujjari, Sheela Kumar
Prasad, Deepak
Sehgal, Praveen Kumar
Srinivasan, Aishwarya
author_facet Babu, Harsha Mysore
Gujjari, Sheela Kumar
Prasad, Deepak
Sehgal, Praveen Kumar
Srinivasan, Aishwarya
author_sort Babu, Harsha Mysore
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gingival recession (GR) can result in root sensitivity, esthetic concern to the patient, and predilection to root caries. The purpose of this randomized clinical study was to evaluate (1) the effect of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) procedure using a bioabsorbable collagen membrane, in comparison to autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) for root coverage in localized gingival recession defects; and (2) the change in width of keratinized gingiva following these two procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 10 cases, showing at least two localized Miller's Class I or Class II gingival recession, participated in this study. In a split mouth design, the pairs of defects were randomly assigned for treatment with either SCTG (SCTG Group) or GTR-based collagen membrane (GTRC Group). Both the grafts were covered with coronally advanced flap. Recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), width of keratinized gingiva (KG), probing depth (PD), relative attachment level (RAL), plaque index (PI), and gingival index (GI) were recorded at baseline, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Six months following root coverage procedures, the mean root coverage was found to be 84.84% ± 16.81% and 84.0% ± 15.19% in SCTG Group and GTRC Group, respectively. The mean keratinized gingival width increase was 1.50 ± 0.70 mm and 2.30 ± 0.67 mm in the SCTG and GTRC group, respectively, which was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: It may be concluded that resorbable collagen membrane can be a reliable alternative to autogenous connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recession.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3283932
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32839322012-02-24 Comparative evaluation of a bioabsorbable collagen membrane and connective tissue graft in the treatment of localized gingival recession: A clinical study Babu, Harsha Mysore Gujjari, Sheela Kumar Prasad, Deepak Sehgal, Praveen Kumar Srinivasan, Aishwarya J Indian Soc Periodontol Original Article BACKGROUND: Gingival recession (GR) can result in root sensitivity, esthetic concern to the patient, and predilection to root caries. The purpose of this randomized clinical study was to evaluate (1) the effect of guided tissue regeneration (GTR) procedure using a bioabsorbable collagen membrane, in comparison to autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) for root coverage in localized gingival recession defects; and (2) the change in width of keratinized gingiva following these two procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 10 cases, showing at least two localized Miller's Class I or Class II gingival recession, participated in this study. In a split mouth design, the pairs of defects were randomly assigned for treatment with either SCTG (SCTG Group) or GTR-based collagen membrane (GTRC Group). Both the grafts were covered with coronally advanced flap. Recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), width of keratinized gingiva (KG), probing depth (PD), relative attachment level (RAL), plaque index (PI), and gingival index (GI) were recorded at baseline, 3 and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Six months following root coverage procedures, the mean root coverage was found to be 84.84% ± 16.81% and 84.0% ± 15.19% in SCTG Group and GTRC Group, respectively. The mean keratinized gingival width increase was 1.50 ± 0.70 mm and 2.30 ± 0.67 mm in the SCTG and GTRC group, respectively, which was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: It may be concluded that resorbable collagen membrane can be a reliable alternative to autogenous connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recession. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2011 /pmc/articles/PMC3283932/ /pubmed/22368359 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.92569 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Babu, Harsha Mysore
Gujjari, Sheela Kumar
Prasad, Deepak
Sehgal, Praveen Kumar
Srinivasan, Aishwarya
Comparative evaluation of a bioabsorbable collagen membrane and connective tissue graft in the treatment of localized gingival recession: A clinical study
title Comparative evaluation of a bioabsorbable collagen membrane and connective tissue graft in the treatment of localized gingival recession: A clinical study
title_full Comparative evaluation of a bioabsorbable collagen membrane and connective tissue graft in the treatment of localized gingival recession: A clinical study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of a bioabsorbable collagen membrane and connective tissue graft in the treatment of localized gingival recession: A clinical study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of a bioabsorbable collagen membrane and connective tissue graft in the treatment of localized gingival recession: A clinical study
title_short Comparative evaluation of a bioabsorbable collagen membrane and connective tissue graft in the treatment of localized gingival recession: A clinical study
title_sort comparative evaluation of a bioabsorbable collagen membrane and connective tissue graft in the treatment of localized gingival recession: a clinical study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3283932/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22368359
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-124X.92569
work_keys_str_mv AT babuharshamysore comparativeevaluationofabioabsorbablecollagenmembraneandconnectivetissuegraftinthetreatmentoflocalizedgingivalrecessionaclinicalstudy
AT gujjarisheelakumar comparativeevaluationofabioabsorbablecollagenmembraneandconnectivetissuegraftinthetreatmentoflocalizedgingivalrecessionaclinicalstudy
AT prasaddeepak comparativeevaluationofabioabsorbablecollagenmembraneandconnectivetissuegraftinthetreatmentoflocalizedgingivalrecessionaclinicalstudy
AT sehgalpraveenkumar comparativeevaluationofabioabsorbablecollagenmembraneandconnectivetissuegraftinthetreatmentoflocalizedgingivalrecessionaclinicalstudy
AT srinivasanaishwarya comparativeevaluationofabioabsorbablecollagenmembraneandconnectivetissuegraftinthetreatmentoflocalizedgingivalrecessionaclinicalstudy