Cargando…
Comparison of oral Midazolam-Ketamine and Midazolam-Promethazine as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry
BACKGROUND: Investigation was designed to evaluate the behavioral changes in children receiving dental treatment while they have been administered combination of Midazolam/Ketamine or Midazolam/Promethazine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized double blind clinical trial with cases being se...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3283976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22363361 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.92925 |
_version_ | 1782224290692726784 |
---|---|
author | Golpayegani, Mojtaba Vahid Dehghan, Fereshteh Ansari, Ghassem Shayeghi, Shahnaz |
author_facet | Golpayegani, Mojtaba Vahid Dehghan, Fereshteh Ansari, Ghassem Shayeghi, Shahnaz |
author_sort | Golpayegani, Mojtaba Vahid |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Investigation was designed to evaluate the behavioral changes in children receiving dental treatment while they have been administered combination of Midazolam/Ketamine or Midazolam/Promethazine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized double blind clinical trial with cases being selected from those uncooperative children aged 2 to 6 years from those referred for treatment under general anesthesia. Anxiety score of all cases were recorded before any attempt using Frankel's anxiety scoring system with those in negative category being included. Cases with at least a pair of similar size cavities on similar teeth were selected with each tooth being randomly allocated for one sedative regimen group. To avoid sequence effect, half of the patients received one regimen at the first visit while the other half received the other regimen as the first. Each case served as control for him or herself to reduce influencing factors. Child's reaction was recorded before, during, and at the end of dental procedure. SO2 as well as Pulse rate were recorded as the most critical vital signs. Collected data were then analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired t-test. RESULTS: Patients’ mean age was 3.5 years with 43% being male. Only 10% of the Ketamine/Midazolam group showed considerable amount of change in their behavior with a statistical significant difference being presented (P=0.029). CONCLUSION: Under the current circumstances, Ketamine/Midazolam combination provided sufficient sedative effect in lower doses. However, Midazolam/Promethazine combination did not produce similar results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3283976 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32839762012-02-23 Comparison of oral Midazolam-Ketamine and Midazolam-Promethazine as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry Golpayegani, Mojtaba Vahid Dehghan, Fereshteh Ansari, Ghassem Shayeghi, Shahnaz Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: Investigation was designed to evaluate the behavioral changes in children receiving dental treatment while they have been administered combination of Midazolam/Ketamine or Midazolam/Promethazine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized double blind clinical trial with cases being selected from those uncooperative children aged 2 to 6 years from those referred for treatment under general anesthesia. Anxiety score of all cases were recorded before any attempt using Frankel's anxiety scoring system with those in negative category being included. Cases with at least a pair of similar size cavities on similar teeth were selected with each tooth being randomly allocated for one sedative regimen group. To avoid sequence effect, half of the patients received one regimen at the first visit while the other half received the other regimen as the first. Each case served as control for him or herself to reduce influencing factors. Child's reaction was recorded before, during, and at the end of dental procedure. SO2 as well as Pulse rate were recorded as the most critical vital signs. Collected data were then analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and paired t-test. RESULTS: Patients’ mean age was 3.5 years with 43% being male. Only 10% of the Ketamine/Midazolam group showed considerable amount of change in their behavior with a statistical significant difference being presented (P=0.029). CONCLUSION: Under the current circumstances, Ketamine/Midazolam combination provided sufficient sedative effect in lower doses. However, Midazolam/Promethazine combination did not produce similar results. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3283976/ /pubmed/22363361 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.92925 Text en Copyright: © Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Golpayegani, Mojtaba Vahid Dehghan, Fereshteh Ansari, Ghassem Shayeghi, Shahnaz Comparison of oral Midazolam-Ketamine and Midazolam-Promethazine as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry |
title | Comparison of oral Midazolam-Ketamine and Midazolam-Promethazine as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry |
title_full | Comparison of oral Midazolam-Ketamine and Midazolam-Promethazine as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry |
title_fullStr | Comparison of oral Midazolam-Ketamine and Midazolam-Promethazine as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of oral Midazolam-Ketamine and Midazolam-Promethazine as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry |
title_short | Comparison of oral Midazolam-Ketamine and Midazolam-Promethazine as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry |
title_sort | comparison of oral midazolam-ketamine and midazolam-promethazine as sedative agents in pediatric dentistry |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3283976/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22363361 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-3327.92925 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT golpayeganimojtabavahid comparisonoforalmidazolamketamineandmidazolampromethazineassedativeagentsinpediatricdentistry AT dehghanfereshteh comparisonoforalmidazolamketamineandmidazolampromethazineassedativeagentsinpediatricdentistry AT ansarighassem comparisonoforalmidazolamketamineandmidazolampromethazineassedativeagentsinpediatricdentistry AT shayeghishahnaz comparisonoforalmidazolamketamineandmidazolampromethazineassedativeagentsinpediatricdentistry |