Cargando…
Effectiveness comparison of endoscopic methods of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding treatment
INTRODUCTION: In every case of upper gastrointestinal bleeding suspicion, an endoscopic examination ought to be performed as a matter of urgency. Finding active bleeding, a visible non-bleeding vessel or a lesion with an adherent clot should be followed by application of an available method of endos...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2010
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3284077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22371806 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2010.14474 |
_version_ | 1782224314903298048 |
---|---|
author | Kujawski, Krzysztof Stasiak, Magdalena Stępień, Mariusz Rysz, Jacek |
author_facet | Kujawski, Krzysztof Stasiak, Magdalena Stępień, Mariusz Rysz, Jacek |
author_sort | Kujawski, Krzysztof |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: In every case of upper gastrointestinal bleeding suspicion, an endoscopic examination ought to be performed as a matter of urgency. Finding active bleeding, a visible non-bleeding vessel or a lesion with an adherent clot should be followed by application of an available method of endoscopic therapy. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of various endoscopic treatment techniques such as epinephrine injections, coagulation methods and mechanical methods in the treatment of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty cases of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding were analysed in terms of the effectiveness of the above-mentioned procedures used in monotherapy or in combination therapy comprising epinephrine injections and clips application. The choice of the applied procedure depended on morphological features and location of the bleeding source, the patient's general condition, as well as technical equipment and manual skills of the endoscopy staff. RESULTS: The study confirmed the effectiveness of endoscopic treatment of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding applying the above-mentioned methods. In most patients, this treatment enabled traumatic surgical intervention to be avoided; it was required in only 3 (5%) out of 60 patients with confirmed upper gastrointestinal bleeding. With the first endoscopy, haemostasis was achieved in 47 cases (78.3%) and the second endoscopy, performed due to bleeding recurrence, was successful in the remaining 10 cases (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS: In non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding, urgent diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy should be the first-line management. If the lesion that is the source of bleeding is possible to localize, the endoscopic techniques should be applied. Among the endoscopic procedures used in monotherapy, clips appeared to be the most effective, their effectiveness being comparable to combination therapy. In bleeding from extensive lesions, coagulation methods are considered to be the most efficacious. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3284077 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2010 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32840772012-02-27 Effectiveness comparison of endoscopic methods of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding treatment Kujawski, Krzysztof Stasiak, Magdalena Stępień, Mariusz Rysz, Jacek Arch Med Sci Clinical Research INTRODUCTION: In every case of upper gastrointestinal bleeding suspicion, an endoscopic examination ought to be performed as a matter of urgency. Finding active bleeding, a visible non-bleeding vessel or a lesion with an adherent clot should be followed by application of an available method of endoscopic therapy. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of various endoscopic treatment techniques such as epinephrine injections, coagulation methods and mechanical methods in the treatment of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty cases of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding were analysed in terms of the effectiveness of the above-mentioned procedures used in monotherapy or in combination therapy comprising epinephrine injections and clips application. The choice of the applied procedure depended on morphological features and location of the bleeding source, the patient's general condition, as well as technical equipment and manual skills of the endoscopy staff. RESULTS: The study confirmed the effectiveness of endoscopic treatment of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding applying the above-mentioned methods. In most patients, this treatment enabled traumatic surgical intervention to be avoided; it was required in only 3 (5%) out of 60 patients with confirmed upper gastrointestinal bleeding. With the first endoscopy, haemostasis was achieved in 47 cases (78.3%) and the second endoscopy, performed due to bleeding recurrence, was successful in the remaining 10 cases (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS: In non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding, urgent diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy should be the first-line management. If the lesion that is the source of bleeding is possible to localize, the endoscopic techniques should be applied. Among the endoscopic procedures used in monotherapy, clips appeared to be the most effective, their effectiveness being comparable to combination therapy. In bleeding from extensive lesions, coagulation methods are considered to be the most efficacious. Termedia Publishing House 2010-09-07 2010-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3284077/ /pubmed/22371806 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2010.14474 Text en Copyright © 2010 Termedia & Banach http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Kujawski, Krzysztof Stasiak, Magdalena Stępień, Mariusz Rysz, Jacek Effectiveness comparison of endoscopic methods of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding treatment |
title | Effectiveness comparison of endoscopic methods of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding treatment |
title_full | Effectiveness comparison of endoscopic methods of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding treatment |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness comparison of endoscopic methods of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding treatment |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness comparison of endoscopic methods of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding treatment |
title_short | Effectiveness comparison of endoscopic methods of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding treatment |
title_sort | effectiveness comparison of endoscopic methods of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding treatment |
topic | Clinical Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3284077/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22371806 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2010.14474 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kujawskikrzysztof effectivenesscomparisonofendoscopicmethodsofnonvaricoseuppergastrointestinalbleedingtreatment AT stasiakmagdalena effectivenesscomparisonofendoscopicmethodsofnonvaricoseuppergastrointestinalbleedingtreatment AT stepienmariusz effectivenesscomparisonofendoscopicmethodsofnonvaricoseuppergastrointestinalbleedingtreatment AT ryszjacek effectivenesscomparisonofendoscopicmethodsofnonvaricoseuppergastrointestinalbleedingtreatment |