Cargando…

Effectiveness comparison of endoscopic methods of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding treatment

INTRODUCTION: In every case of upper gastrointestinal bleeding suspicion, an endoscopic examination ought to be performed as a matter of urgency. Finding active bleeding, a visible non-bleeding vessel or a lesion with an adherent clot should be followed by application of an available method of endos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kujawski, Krzysztof, Stasiak, Magdalena, Stępień, Mariusz, Rysz, Jacek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3284077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22371806
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2010.14474
_version_ 1782224314903298048
author Kujawski, Krzysztof
Stasiak, Magdalena
Stępień, Mariusz
Rysz, Jacek
author_facet Kujawski, Krzysztof
Stasiak, Magdalena
Stępień, Mariusz
Rysz, Jacek
author_sort Kujawski, Krzysztof
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: In every case of upper gastrointestinal bleeding suspicion, an endoscopic examination ought to be performed as a matter of urgency. Finding active bleeding, a visible non-bleeding vessel or a lesion with an adherent clot should be followed by application of an available method of endoscopic therapy. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of various endoscopic treatment techniques such as epinephrine injections, coagulation methods and mechanical methods in the treatment of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty cases of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding were analysed in terms of the effectiveness of the above-mentioned procedures used in monotherapy or in combination therapy comprising epinephrine injections and clips application. The choice of the applied procedure depended on morphological features and location of the bleeding source, the patient's general condition, as well as technical equipment and manual skills of the endoscopy staff. RESULTS: The study confirmed the effectiveness of endoscopic treatment of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding applying the above-mentioned methods. In most patients, this treatment enabled traumatic surgical intervention to be avoided; it was required in only 3 (5%) out of 60 patients with confirmed upper gastrointestinal bleeding. With the first endoscopy, haemostasis was achieved in 47 cases (78.3%) and the second endoscopy, performed due to bleeding recurrence, was successful in the remaining 10 cases (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS: In non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding, urgent diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy should be the first-line management. If the lesion that is the source of bleeding is possible to localize, the endoscopic techniques should be applied. Among the endoscopic procedures used in monotherapy, clips appeared to be the most effective, their effectiveness being comparable to combination therapy. In bleeding from extensive lesions, coagulation methods are considered to be the most efficacious.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3284077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32840772012-02-27 Effectiveness comparison of endoscopic methods of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding treatment Kujawski, Krzysztof Stasiak, Magdalena Stępień, Mariusz Rysz, Jacek Arch Med Sci Clinical Research INTRODUCTION: In every case of upper gastrointestinal bleeding suspicion, an endoscopic examination ought to be performed as a matter of urgency. Finding active bleeding, a visible non-bleeding vessel or a lesion with an adherent clot should be followed by application of an available method of endoscopic therapy. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of various endoscopic treatment techniques such as epinephrine injections, coagulation methods and mechanical methods in the treatment of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty cases of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding were analysed in terms of the effectiveness of the above-mentioned procedures used in monotherapy or in combination therapy comprising epinephrine injections and clips application. The choice of the applied procedure depended on morphological features and location of the bleeding source, the patient's general condition, as well as technical equipment and manual skills of the endoscopy staff. RESULTS: The study confirmed the effectiveness of endoscopic treatment of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding applying the above-mentioned methods. In most patients, this treatment enabled traumatic surgical intervention to be avoided; it was required in only 3 (5%) out of 60 patients with confirmed upper gastrointestinal bleeding. With the first endoscopy, haemostasis was achieved in 47 cases (78.3%) and the second endoscopy, performed due to bleeding recurrence, was successful in the remaining 10 cases (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS: In non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding, urgent diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy should be the first-line management. If the lesion that is the source of bleeding is possible to localize, the endoscopic techniques should be applied. Among the endoscopic procedures used in monotherapy, clips appeared to be the most effective, their effectiveness being comparable to combination therapy. In bleeding from extensive lesions, coagulation methods are considered to be the most efficacious. Termedia Publishing House 2010-09-07 2010-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3284077/ /pubmed/22371806 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2010.14474 Text en Copyright © 2010 Termedia & Banach http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Kujawski, Krzysztof
Stasiak, Magdalena
Stępień, Mariusz
Rysz, Jacek
Effectiveness comparison of endoscopic methods of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding treatment
title Effectiveness comparison of endoscopic methods of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding treatment
title_full Effectiveness comparison of endoscopic methods of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding treatment
title_fullStr Effectiveness comparison of endoscopic methods of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding treatment
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness comparison of endoscopic methods of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding treatment
title_short Effectiveness comparison of endoscopic methods of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding treatment
title_sort effectiveness comparison of endoscopic methods of non-varicose upper gastrointestinal bleeding treatment
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3284077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22371806
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2010.14474
work_keys_str_mv AT kujawskikrzysztof effectivenesscomparisonofendoscopicmethodsofnonvaricoseuppergastrointestinalbleedingtreatment
AT stasiakmagdalena effectivenesscomparisonofendoscopicmethodsofnonvaricoseuppergastrointestinalbleedingtreatment
AT stepienmariusz effectivenesscomparisonofendoscopicmethodsofnonvaricoseuppergastrointestinalbleedingtreatment
AT ryszjacek effectivenesscomparisonofendoscopicmethodsofnonvaricoseuppergastrointestinalbleedingtreatment