Cargando…
Knee instruments and rating scales designed to measure outcomes
In this article, the knee instruments and rating scales that are designed to measure outcomes are revised. Although the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form can be used as a general knee measure, no instrument is currently universally applicable across the spectrum of knee...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3284660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22274914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-011-0177-4 |
_version_ | 1782224385031012352 |
---|---|
author | Rodriguez-Merchan, E. Carlos |
author_facet | Rodriguez-Merchan, E. Carlos |
author_sort | Rodriguez-Merchan, E. Carlos |
collection | PubMed |
description | In this article, the knee instruments and rating scales that are designed to measure outcomes are revised. Although the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form can be used as a general knee measure, no instrument is currently universally applicable across the spectrum of knee disorders and patient groups. Clinicians and researchers looking to use a patient-based score for measurement of outcomes must consider the specific patient population in which it has been evaluated. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index is recommended for the evaluation of treatment effect in persons with osteoarthritis (OA). This is a generic health status questionnaire that contains 36 items, is widely used, and easy to complete. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire evaluates the functional status and quality of life (QoL) of patients with any type of knee injury who are at increased risk of developing OA; i.e., patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, meniscus injury, or chondral injury. So far, the KOOS questionnaire has been validated for several orthopedic procedures such as total knee arthroplasty, ACL reconstruction, and meniscectomy. The utilization of QoL questionnaires is crucial to the adequate assessment of a number of orthopedic procedures of the knee. The questionnaires are generally well accepted by the patients and open up new perspectives in the analysis of prognostic factors for optimal QoL of patients undergoing knee surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3284660 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-32846602012-03-08 Knee instruments and rating scales designed to measure outcomes Rodriguez-Merchan, E. Carlos J Orthop Traumatol Review Article In this article, the knee instruments and rating scales that are designed to measure outcomes are revised. Although the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form can be used as a general knee measure, no instrument is currently universally applicable across the spectrum of knee disorders and patient groups. Clinicians and researchers looking to use a patient-based score for measurement of outcomes must consider the specific patient population in which it has been evaluated. The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index is recommended for the evaluation of treatment effect in persons with osteoarthritis (OA). This is a generic health status questionnaire that contains 36 items, is widely used, and easy to complete. The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) questionnaire evaluates the functional status and quality of life (QoL) of patients with any type of knee injury who are at increased risk of developing OA; i.e., patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury, meniscus injury, or chondral injury. So far, the KOOS questionnaire has been validated for several orthopedic procedures such as total knee arthroplasty, ACL reconstruction, and meniscectomy. The utilization of QoL questionnaires is crucial to the adequate assessment of a number of orthopedic procedures of the knee. The questionnaires are generally well accepted by the patients and open up new perspectives in the analysis of prognostic factors for optimal QoL of patients undergoing knee surgery. Springer International Publishing 2012-01-25 2012-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3284660/ /pubmed/22274914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-011-0177-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Article Rodriguez-Merchan, E. Carlos Knee instruments and rating scales designed to measure outcomes |
title | Knee instruments and rating scales designed to measure outcomes |
title_full | Knee instruments and rating scales designed to measure outcomes |
title_fullStr | Knee instruments and rating scales designed to measure outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | Knee instruments and rating scales designed to measure outcomes |
title_short | Knee instruments and rating scales designed to measure outcomes |
title_sort | knee instruments and rating scales designed to measure outcomes |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3284660/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22274914 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-011-0177-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rodriguezmerchanecarlos kneeinstrumentsandratingscalesdesignedtomeasureoutcomes |