Cargando…

Lower limb deformity following proximal tibia physeal injury: long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND: Proximal tibial physeal injuries are quite rare, but their complications can be of great importance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of this injury on the axis and length of a child’s limb. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study focused on 12 patients with proximal physea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vrettakos, Aristides N., Evaggelidis, Dimosthenis C., Kyrkos, Margaritis J., Tsatsos, Apostolos V., Nenopoulos, Alexandros, Beslikas, Theodoros
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3284663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22327836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-012-0179-x
_version_ 1782224385724121088
author Vrettakos, Aristides N.
Evaggelidis, Dimosthenis C.
Kyrkos, Margaritis J.
Tsatsos, Apostolos V.
Nenopoulos, Alexandros
Beslikas, Theodoros
author_facet Vrettakos, Aristides N.
Evaggelidis, Dimosthenis C.
Kyrkos, Margaritis J.
Tsatsos, Apostolos V.
Nenopoulos, Alexandros
Beslikas, Theodoros
author_sort Vrettakos, Aristides N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Proximal tibial physeal injuries are quite rare, but their complications can be of great importance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of this injury on the axis and length of a child’s limb. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study focused on 12 patients with proximal physeal injury of the tibia (8 boys and 4 girls; mean age at the time of injury: 8.9 years). Injuries were classified according to the Salter–Harris scheme into 5 types (type II—7 patients, type III—3 patients, type IV—1 patient, type V—1 patient). In 5 cases, a coexisting fracture of the injured limb was observed (fibular fracture—3 cases, intercondylar fracture—1 case, tibial tubercle fracture—1 case). Ten patients were treated conservatively and 2 patients underwent an operation. Seven of the 12 patients were available for long-term follow-up, with a mean duration of 14.4 years (11.2–22.0 years). RESULTS: Angular deformity was observed in 6 of the 7 patients, with a mean valgus deformity of 2.7°, within an average of 5.8 months after the injury. After 3 years of follow-up, complete remodeling was observed in all of those 6 cases (4 of the patients were treated conservatively and 2 underwent surgery). One patient developed 6 mm of tibial shortening. No functional limitation or pain was recorded in any of the patients during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Injury to the proximal tibial epiphysis, while rare, may result in angular or length disturbance, regardless of the initial treatment (conservative or surgical). Parents should always be informed of this possibility, and long follow-up is indicated. Nevertheless, this type of injury rarely results in functional limitations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3284663
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32846632012-03-08 Lower limb deformity following proximal tibia physeal injury: long-term follow-up Vrettakos, Aristides N. Evaggelidis, Dimosthenis C. Kyrkos, Margaritis J. Tsatsos, Apostolos V. Nenopoulos, Alexandros Beslikas, Theodoros J Orthop Traumatol Original Article BACKGROUND: Proximal tibial physeal injuries are quite rare, but their complications can be of great importance. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of this injury on the axis and length of a child’s limb. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study focused on 12 patients with proximal physeal injury of the tibia (8 boys and 4 girls; mean age at the time of injury: 8.9 years). Injuries were classified according to the Salter–Harris scheme into 5 types (type II—7 patients, type III—3 patients, type IV—1 patient, type V—1 patient). In 5 cases, a coexisting fracture of the injured limb was observed (fibular fracture—3 cases, intercondylar fracture—1 case, tibial tubercle fracture—1 case). Ten patients were treated conservatively and 2 patients underwent an operation. Seven of the 12 patients were available for long-term follow-up, with a mean duration of 14.4 years (11.2–22.0 years). RESULTS: Angular deformity was observed in 6 of the 7 patients, with a mean valgus deformity of 2.7°, within an average of 5.8 months after the injury. After 3 years of follow-up, complete remodeling was observed in all of those 6 cases (4 of the patients were treated conservatively and 2 underwent surgery). One patient developed 6 mm of tibial shortening. No functional limitation or pain was recorded in any of the patients during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Injury to the proximal tibial epiphysis, while rare, may result in angular or length disturbance, regardless of the initial treatment (conservative or surgical). Parents should always be informed of this possibility, and long follow-up is indicated. Nevertheless, this type of injury rarely results in functional limitations. Springer International Publishing 2012-02-11 2012-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3284663/ /pubmed/22327836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-012-0179-x Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Vrettakos, Aristides N.
Evaggelidis, Dimosthenis C.
Kyrkos, Margaritis J.
Tsatsos, Apostolos V.
Nenopoulos, Alexandros
Beslikas, Theodoros
Lower limb deformity following proximal tibia physeal injury: long-term follow-up
title Lower limb deformity following proximal tibia physeal injury: long-term follow-up
title_full Lower limb deformity following proximal tibia physeal injury: long-term follow-up
title_fullStr Lower limb deformity following proximal tibia physeal injury: long-term follow-up
title_full_unstemmed Lower limb deformity following proximal tibia physeal injury: long-term follow-up
title_short Lower limb deformity following proximal tibia physeal injury: long-term follow-up
title_sort lower limb deformity following proximal tibia physeal injury: long-term follow-up
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3284663/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22327836
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10195-012-0179-x
work_keys_str_mv AT vrettakosaristidesn lowerlimbdeformityfollowingproximaltibiaphysealinjurylongtermfollowup
AT evaggelidisdimosthenisc lowerlimbdeformityfollowingproximaltibiaphysealinjurylongtermfollowup
AT kyrkosmargaritisj lowerlimbdeformityfollowingproximaltibiaphysealinjurylongtermfollowup
AT tsatsosapostolosv lowerlimbdeformityfollowingproximaltibiaphysealinjurylongtermfollowup
AT nenopoulosalexandros lowerlimbdeformityfollowingproximaltibiaphysealinjurylongtermfollowup
AT beslikastheodoros lowerlimbdeformityfollowingproximaltibiaphysealinjurylongtermfollowup