Cargando…

European survey on the use of prophylactic fluconazole in neonatal intensive care units

Neonatal fungal infections are associated with substantial mortality and morbidity. Although prophylactic use of several antifungals has been proposed, this practice remains controversial. In order to evaluate the use of fluconazole prophylaxis in European NICUs, we conducted a cross-sectional surve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaguelidou, Florentia, Pandolfini, Chiara, Manzoni, Paolo, Choonara, Imti, Bonati, Maurizio, Jacqz-Aigrain, Evelyne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3284680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21912893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-011-1565-8
_version_ 1782224389646843904
author Kaguelidou, Florentia
Pandolfini, Chiara
Manzoni, Paolo
Choonara, Imti
Bonati, Maurizio
Jacqz-Aigrain, Evelyne
author_facet Kaguelidou, Florentia
Pandolfini, Chiara
Manzoni, Paolo
Choonara, Imti
Bonati, Maurizio
Jacqz-Aigrain, Evelyne
author_sort Kaguelidou, Florentia
collection PubMed
description Neonatal fungal infections are associated with substantial mortality and morbidity. Although prophylactic use of several antifungals has been proposed, this practice remains controversial. In order to evaluate the use of fluconazole prophylaxis in European NICUs, we conducted a cross-sectional survey by means of a structured questionnaire that was sent to European level II and III neonatal intensive care units, over a 9-month period, as part of a neonatal research FP7 European project. A total of 193 questionnaires from 28 countries were analysed. Use of antifungal prophylaxis was reported by 55% of the responders, and the most frequently used antifungal agent was fluconazole (92%). Main indications for prophylaxis were low gestational age (<28 weeks) and birth weight (<1,000 g). A dose of 3 mg/kg was used in 66% of NICUs using fluconazole, with an administration interval of 72 h in 52% of them. All responders acknowledged the need for additional trials on the efficacy of prophylactic fluconazole. Non-users of fluconazole prophylaxis were more likely to be influenced by the local incidence of candidiasis, the risk of increasing antifungal resistance and the absence of specific recommendations by paediatric societies. Conclusions: Major concerns about the use of fluconazole prophylaxis include its efficacy, the risk of emergence of resistant species and the absence of clear consensus to support routine use. Future studies that address these issues will contribute to a more rational use of fluconazole prophylaxis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3284680
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-32846802012-03-08 European survey on the use of prophylactic fluconazole in neonatal intensive care units Kaguelidou, Florentia Pandolfini, Chiara Manzoni, Paolo Choonara, Imti Bonati, Maurizio Jacqz-Aigrain, Evelyne Eur J Pediatr Original Paper Neonatal fungal infections are associated with substantial mortality and morbidity. Although prophylactic use of several antifungals has been proposed, this practice remains controversial. In order to evaluate the use of fluconazole prophylaxis in European NICUs, we conducted a cross-sectional survey by means of a structured questionnaire that was sent to European level II and III neonatal intensive care units, over a 9-month period, as part of a neonatal research FP7 European project. A total of 193 questionnaires from 28 countries were analysed. Use of antifungal prophylaxis was reported by 55% of the responders, and the most frequently used antifungal agent was fluconazole (92%). Main indications for prophylaxis were low gestational age (<28 weeks) and birth weight (<1,000 g). A dose of 3 mg/kg was used in 66% of NICUs using fluconazole, with an administration interval of 72 h in 52% of them. All responders acknowledged the need for additional trials on the efficacy of prophylactic fluconazole. Non-users of fluconazole prophylaxis were more likely to be influenced by the local incidence of candidiasis, the risk of increasing antifungal resistance and the absence of specific recommendations by paediatric societies. Conclusions: Major concerns about the use of fluconazole prophylaxis include its efficacy, the risk of emergence of resistant species and the absence of clear consensus to support routine use. Future studies that address these issues will contribute to a more rational use of fluconazole prophylaxis. Springer-Verlag 2011-09-14 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3284680/ /pubmed/21912893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-011-1565-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kaguelidou, Florentia
Pandolfini, Chiara
Manzoni, Paolo
Choonara, Imti
Bonati, Maurizio
Jacqz-Aigrain, Evelyne
European survey on the use of prophylactic fluconazole in neonatal intensive care units
title European survey on the use of prophylactic fluconazole in neonatal intensive care units
title_full European survey on the use of prophylactic fluconazole in neonatal intensive care units
title_fullStr European survey on the use of prophylactic fluconazole in neonatal intensive care units
title_full_unstemmed European survey on the use of prophylactic fluconazole in neonatal intensive care units
title_short European survey on the use of prophylactic fluconazole in neonatal intensive care units
title_sort european survey on the use of prophylactic fluconazole in neonatal intensive care units
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3284680/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21912893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00431-011-1565-8
work_keys_str_mv AT kaguelidouflorentia europeansurveyontheuseofprophylacticfluconazoleinneonatalintensivecareunits
AT pandolfinichiara europeansurveyontheuseofprophylacticfluconazoleinneonatalintensivecareunits
AT manzonipaolo europeansurveyontheuseofprophylacticfluconazoleinneonatalintensivecareunits
AT choonaraimti europeansurveyontheuseofprophylacticfluconazoleinneonatalintensivecareunits
AT bonatimaurizio europeansurveyontheuseofprophylacticfluconazoleinneonatalintensivecareunits
AT jacqzaigrainevelyne europeansurveyontheuseofprophylacticfluconazoleinneonatalintensivecareunits